Quote Originally Posted by TIGERJC
iraq was not that big of a threat to the u.s., where are the wmds and all the huge stock piles of chemical weapons that he was ready to launch. WHERE IS IT AT????? Right onw many iraqis dont have power, security, food and a lot of iraqis are asking themeselves is this democracy.

I don't blame iraq for not allowing ppl to see if they had wmds or not. Guess who is thier fucking neighbor, IRAN. I wouldnt want abybody to know what I had, if I had a enemy next door to me that has a nuclear facility and hates my guts.
Sadaam was harboring terrorists. He was stockpiling chemical weapons. We know this because he was using them on his own people as well as the Kuwaities. One of Sadaam's leutenants(sp) appeared on CNN a couple monthes after we invaded stating that the chemical and biological agents were shipped in convoys to Syria the moment the US crossed the border. WMD's were one of 16 counts of war against Sadaam. At the end of Desert storm Sadaam agreed to allow UN weapons inspectors into his country to screen for WMD's and chemical weps. He refused to give them access to his facilities. He may not have had nuclear capabilities at the time we invaded, but it is common knowledge that the was in the market. Iran doesn't have a running nuclear program and hopefully they never will. We don't fuck with North Korea because they have hundreds of nuclear ICBM's and Kim Jong whatever his last name is is crazy enough to use them. Iraq is in the reconstruction phase. That's why we are over there now.

As for the wars in Africa. Hit up Google and run a search on "Executive Outcomes." They were a freelance group of soldiers for hire who faught wars on behalf of the African governments and did this with astounding success. The reason they aren't over there still would be because Bill Clinton and the UN made them pull out and cancel their contracts. Executive Outcomes offered to go into Rwanda and the Clinton administration said "NO." The UN sent in 300,000 peacekeepers to stabilize Sierra Lionne and the rebels took it back. I would rather have a president who is willing to do what is necessary and defend those who can't defend themselves than a Democrat who would rather get paid for the weapons he's selling to African rebels so they can maim and murder civillians.