So straight people are incapable of doing this too? Has anyone ever looked at the divorce rate for Gay and Lesbian relationships? Im looking for it online, but I remember it being EXTREMELY low. Like less than 8%. Compare that to the percentage of straight divorces.Couldn't EVERYBODY "say" they're "married" in order to get benefits they are otherwise NOT entitled to? What would that do to the costs of all of us that ARE in fact legally married when we go apply for the same benefits? Where do you think the additional costs are gonna be passed on to?
Hey, maybe sex with a goat wouldnt end up in divorce, but a goat cant do things like give sexual consent, so that may be one of many reasons its illegal. A 12 year old girl isnt seen as capable of making a decision such as marriage, that is why it requires the consent of her guardian [and hey, it happens].
Polygamy. Yea, some religions find it ok. One is Islam. You can have as many as 4 wives. Some see a problem with that. I dont. Because people leave out the part that says that you must treat each as equals, and you cant even think of doing it unless you are financially and emotionally capable. Its not seen as "Oh, I get to sleep around with different women". Plus its not as common as many think as well. I think thats the problem, with this issue and gay marriage. People cant focus past the gay sex, and sex with multiple woman. There is more to a relationship than kissing and having sex.
But at the same time, why shouldnt two women or men share the same benefit as a man and a woman? Because of their sexual preference? I mean, why not have a man and woman do the same? Then there are some who actually get married for love, and to show commitment to the person they are with, the exact same way a straight couple would. Nobody see anything wrong with denying people the same privelages as others because they are gay? Thats what it boils down to. IF you are gay, you cant do X. Set limits, I agree, but in a different light. Because if we dont set a limit on this soon, soon it will be if you are X you cant do B. I think the convo has had a money focus because we are talking government. The government isnt really known to operate based on emotion, and its hard to translate that into FACT. I mean, when you get married you fill out paperwork, but it has nowhere requesting information on why you love someone, how you met, how much you love the other, what you plan on doing in case of problems. Its a political issue. I dont think "I love this man!" holds up as valid convo because many people find it hard two people of the same sex loving each other [I know I do].BTW, the majority of the arguments stem from MONEY. Benefits this and money that. Do yall realize that anyone can bequeath anything they want to whomever they want NOW? Tax burden aside, IF the big argument is leaving money to a "significant other" IS in fact that big a deal.....why not bequeath it to them then? If you can leave money to your dog, you can leave money to your gay lover too. What's the beef?




Reply With Quote






