Originally Posted by
Vteckidd
Agree with QD 1000%
Our justice system is based on the prosecution proving BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT she did it.
MURDER WEAPON: unknown
DNA: none linking her to the deceased. Trunk had "decaying body air particles" but nothing conclusive it was her daughter
MOTIVE: mild. Up until the point of disappearance she was for all intensive purposes a good mother. No child abuse we know of or can prove etc
CAUSE OF DEATH: unknown. Most likely she was strangled or she was suffocated either intentional (with duct tape) or unintentional (drowning) but still unknown.
This was a horrible case for the prosecution. Caylee could have wandered in the jungle and died there, drowned, etc NO ONE KNOWS FOR CERTAINTY which is why they said not guilty.
I believe she did it, or she knows what happened. But we don't operate on beliefs we operate on FACTS AND WHAT YOU CAN PROVE.
They couldn't prove she did it.
Erratic behavior, despair, partying, promiscuity, LIEING is a far leap from murderer.
Justice system worked, sad, but blame lies with prosecution, and maybe she committed a perfect murder.
100% correct
Reply With Quote