New Threat on the U.S.

[Salty12]

Bush makes public appearances, as does Tony Blair. Al Qaeda does not schedule press conferences or have formally announced meetings with their allies.

When we fought the british yes there were many ambushes and destruction of naval ships in deceptives ways, but we also confronted the enemy in battle. Each camp knew where the other was stationed. It was more of a "here we are and this is what we are going to do" on each side. That is not the case in the current war. The US has said here we are, and these are our tangable goals, Al Qaeda has yet to say anything of the such.

[AWD OWNZ U]

Bush makes public appearances, as does Tony Blair. Al Qaeda does not schedule press conferences or have formally announced meetings with their allies.

I knew you were gonna say that. Its true, but he only does it in area we firmly control (which is most of the world). I'm sure if Al Qaeda had an entire country that was secure they would do the same. I'm also sure if Bush didn't he would not.

When we fought the british yes there were many ambushes and destruction of naval ships in deceptives ways, but we also confronted the enemy in battle. Each camp knew where the other was stationed. It was more of a "here we are and this is what we are going to do" on each side. That is not the case in the current war. The US has said here we are, and these are our tangable goals, Al Qaeda has yet to say anything of the such.

They confront us in battle every day man. Read the news most of the soldiers in Afghanistan are killed in gun battles. There just usually aren't as many casualities so its not covered as much. Honestly I don't think that's true about the revolutionary war. Its been a while since history, but I'd be shocked if any commander was stupid enough to give away all his troop positions. Al Qaeda has said what they want, us gone.

[efman]

[QUOTE=AWD OWNZ U]I knew you were gonna say that. Its true, but he only does it in area we firmly control (which is most of the world). I'm sure if Al Qaeda had an entire country that was secure they would do the same. I'm also sure if Bush didn't he would not.


umm dude up to a few years ago they did have that it was called afghanastan which they rented for a large some of money, history channel facts. but they still only had vidoes then and did'nt bush go to iraq ?

[AWD OWNZ U]

umm dude up to a few years ago they did have that it was called afghanastan which they rented for a large some of money, history channel facts. but they still only had vidoes then and did'nt bush go to iraq?

I would hardly call Afghanastan secure at any point in time. Don't forget they were barely finished with an incredibly bloody civil war with the Soviets. Bin Laden was still a wanted man, I'm sure we would have caught him if he had scheduled an appearance hence not secure. No Bush went to an aircraft carrier and I'm sure he didn't give Bin Laden a heads up.

[efman]

I would hardly call Afghanastan secure at any point in time. Don't forget they were barely finished with an incredibly bloody civil war with the Soviets. Bin Laden was still a wanted man, I'm sure we would have caught him if he had scheduled an appearance hence not secure. No Bush went to an aircraft carrier and I'm sure he didn't give Bin Laden a heads up.

well if the damn towel head had cnn he probaly would've known lol