Lol you seeing things who said a vette was slower ? Also I'm sure if you could afford just a quarter of the investment that corvette had you would be driving a New car. Not a money eating 240sx that has no warranty and probaly liability insurance.
Lol you seeing things who said a vette was slower ? Also I'm sure if you could afford just a quarter of the investment that corvette had you would be driving a New car. Not a money eating 240sx that has no warranty and probaly liability insurance.
I really don't even know where the fuck the logic went in this thread. It went from reasonable discussion to being clogged with 99999 pointless images that have nothing to do with anything.Originally Posted by -EnVus-
As I mentioned in an earlier post, this is not advocating mustangs, this is advocating all newer cars that offer good performance for the money. The mustang was another arbitrary example just like the Geo Metro. Regardless, I agree that the mustang interior is quite nice so I don't know what you're getting at.
By the way... That interior is done up tacky.OP is gonna like this one................... 1989 supra
whats tacky about it? the removable laptop in the passenger seat? if i have a soccer ball sitting in my passenger seat, thats not part of the interior.
explain to me what makes a 240sx money eating. I havnt had to repair anything on my car in almost 4 years.
Well if yours was stock the shitty suspension, shitty engine, shitty tranny, list of wiring issues and shorts over time. Leaks Etc etc etc
Nothing about a 240sx is expensive or complicated to repair or replace. Nothing money eating about it. Cheap parts that are readily available... you know... theres a reason these cars are popular right???
Also, i dont want a new car. To me a new car is the worst investment you could ever make. If i really really really really wanted the 2012 mustang...... id wait 2 years and buy it.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote