Project "Whine"

[Starrfire]

A.because the sho has never been an all out performer. Just ok at passing and stuff.
B.Don't know about the curb weights of all the AWD vehicles produced here.
C. Because they are cheaper and a better performer, especially if you plan to modify them.

[JITB]

A.because the sho has never been an all out performer. Just ok at passing and stuff.
B.Don't know about the curb weights of all the AWD vehicles produced here.
C. Because they are cheaper and a better performer, especially if you plan to modify them.

A. neither was the honda civic

B. Gonna be hard to find any new turbo Awd cars sold in the US under 3500 lbs

C. Thats all opinion based, except the price. Stock v Stock i believe they both wouldnt be too far apart.

[One_Bad_SHO]

A.because the sho has never been an all out performer. Just ok at passing and stuff.
B.Don't know about the curb weights of all the AWD vehicles produced here.
C. Because they are cheaper and a better performer, especially if you plan to modify them.

The first gen SHOs outperformed the BMW 5 series of its day and costed half as much, not to mention the Caddys and Audis it put to shame. Speed, safety, you name it. Look it up. Google is your friend.

Secondly, the new SHO outperforms more expensive rivals such as the v8 Audi a6. Many more tests can be found on youtube.

All in all, I don't like the new SHO all that much nor did I create this thread to debate the ups and downs of it. I'm a die-hard old school SHO fan, back when they all had YAMAHA engines.