Thanks for the words Jessie. I dunno.. I mean, I scrape on large speed bumps..and not with the bumper. Having the wheels/tires pretty even with the sides of the car and not having to use -42* of camer is when sh!ts done right..to me. There is also a difference between proper and exaggerated fitment..shit like what Simon posted is bandwagon garbage. Having a bit of "stretch" to tighten up the sidewalls isn't bad either. But the over-the-top stuff is getting lame. Wide rims are for wide tires. If you can't fit them under stock bodywork...f*cking flare it and get tires that fit because narrow tires on wide rims are ummmm not so hot. I just don't get the mentality of "well, I want that deep dish wide wheel look, but I don't care to finish the look with some beefy tires". I know several people who are guilty of this and it works for them, i'm not going to rag on their cars...but in an open discussion such as this, I will voice my opinion. With that said, i'm sure not everyone thinks that the beefy 235-40/17 tires I run look to big/goofy/dumb.....




Yes, I know the Euro crew really set the "trend" off many, many years ago...but I was just having a little fun with it....since people in Cali take it to the extreme..and then claim it was their idea lol.

Here is my idea of proper fitment that is functional and looks "right" (though I call it "beefy")..235-40/17 slicks on 17x7.5 wheels that are +40 offset and -1.8* camber....no rolling of fenders needed either. I wasn't going for quality here, just representation of fitment**