E92/93 m3 fail

[allmotoronly]

LOL WUT?

You seriously doubt I Ever Driven one.

It wasn't blazing fast. It was what I expected it to be, just an avg. all around car. That look great. I like the DCT more, personally, I hope they get that lag issue resloved with it. Anyways I don't think it over priced. The Rs4 and Merc around the same price range. Both have v8, Both are not blinding fast. The M3 is the better out of the 3. I believe. I just hate when people think if it doesn't beat the z06 then it and it 60k it overpriced. Lol Z06 hands down is the bang for the buck and then again is the m3 really in the same cat.

Anyways MDCT is the Future.

First off, grammar and punctuation own you.

Second off, Considering again that you type like a 12 year old kid, I highly doubt you have even driven an e92 M3.

Third off, Frog's opinion highly outweighs yours. He has no reason to lie.

[gtrmonkey]

First off, grammar and punctuation own you.

Second off, Considering again that you type like a 12 year old kid, I highly doubt you have even driven an e92 M3.

Third off, Frog's opinion highly outweighs yours. He has no reason to lie.

Lol ok bro, Bang on my typing great logical attack.

First off Frog had different expectation for this car then I did. So My thought are different then his.

Second off do you see where the fuck I live dumb shit. I am around cars like this 24/7. Not to be cocky or anything.

I never accused frog of lieing. He expected a monster track car and I never did. Second you can't compare this car experince to a 911 or z06 or cayman or gtr or what not. IS the Rs4 a Track monster, NO, IS the C65amg a Track monster, NO! IS the M3 E90 a track monster, NO!

I never said it was blindly fast, but for practical purpose and a fun car. Yes it is.

I am pretty sure Frog is flatter by your E-love for him. He might even give you a cookie.

[Kaiser]

I never accused frog of lieing. He expected a monster track car and I never did. Second you can't compare this car experince to a 911 or z06 or cayman or gtr or what not. IS the Rs4 a Track monster, NO, IS the C65amg a Track monster, NO! IS the M3 E90 a track monster, NO!

B5 RS4 was meant to compete with the super-wagon BMW was building at the time. Built for Autobahn speed. The new RS4's follow that tradition.

C65 AMG is a luxury Benz with a big engine in it.

The M3's started with the E30 and had a tiny little four cylinder that whines it's heart out as you wind it up, it sings when you're running high-RPM's through twisty roads. It was proof that you didn't need a huge engine to go quick. The E30 3-series even had a bigger engine version in the lineup. The M3 was faster. Now we go through the other two generations and watch a progression from the E30 to something more akin to what the RS4 and the AMG stuff has always been. It's not a bad thing for BMW when they look at their sales figures. There's a reason why. However it is a sad day for M3-purists to see the M3 take a position a whole lot closer to what the M5 was, and it's mostly because the cars have all just gotten so much bigger.

Personally, I hope BMW gives us a real 1-series M-version with a four/six or something smaller based more around being light and nimble. Would be a good return to things.

[gtrmonkey]

B5 RS4 was meant to compete with the super-wagon BMW was building at the time. Built for Autobahn speed. The new RS4's follow that tradition.

C65 AMG is a luxury Benz with a big engine in it.

The M3's started with the E30 and had a tiny little four cylinder that whines it's heart out as you wind it up, it sings when you're running high-RPM's through twisty roads. It was proof that you didn't need a huge engine to go quick. The E30 3-series even had a bigger engine version in the lineup. The M3 was faster. Now we go through the other two generations and watch a progression from the E30 to something more akin to what the RS4 and the AMG stuff has always been. It's not a bad thing for BMW when they look at their sales figures. There's a reason why. However it is a sad day for M3-purists to see the M3 take a position a whole lot closer to what the M5 was, and it's mostly because the cars have all just gotten so much bigger.

Personally, I hope BMW gives us a real 1-series M-version with a four/six or something smaller based more around being light and nimble. Would be a good return to things.

lol dude what are you trying to talk about your all over the place. That where the new m3 fits man. With those cars I sayed above. I do agree bmw is more focus on sales then there race pregree. lol

[allmotoronly]

Lol ok bro, Bang on my typing great logical attack.

First off Frog had different expectation for this car then I did. So My thought are different then his.

Second off do you see where the fuck I live dumb shit. I am around cars like this 24/7. Not to be cocky or anything.

I never accused frog of lieing. He expected a monster track car and I never did. Second you can't compare this car experince to a 911 or z06 or cayman or gtr or what not. IS the Rs4 a Track monster, NO, IS the C65amg a Track monster, NO! IS the M3 E90 a track monster, NO!

I never said it was blindly fast, but for practical purpose and a fun car. Yes it is.

I am pretty sure Frog is flatter by your E-love for him. He might even give you a cookie.

Frog had an expectation of the car that should be expected of an M vehicle. BMW's M division should go back to their roots, which were forged in racing and competition, not luxury and comfort.

I don't give a fuck where you live and what cars you are around. I could go out and buy most of the cars discussed here in this thread short of a 997 turbo. I choose not to because I would like to retire by age 40.