^^^^ ummmmmmmmm...![]()
^^^^ ummmmmmmmm...![]()
ASAP NorthWest Ga Chapter VP
www.ASAPCarClub.com
Kennesaw MEET Check it out>>>>> http://www.importatlanta.com/forums/...d.php?t=250694
Originally Posted by DynamicSound
![]()
Neon PoWa
Now Delta 46 equipped
432whp/425wtq on lower boost
The fact that its a neon is the whole point. A sti is just a wrx a evo is just a lancer, and a honda...... well is just a honda. They all have base models. I mean it sucks that srt-4s are the most hated on cars. Sorry for the damn good price and it being nasty from factory.![]()
ASAP NorthWest Ga Chapter VP
www.ASAPCarClub.com
Kennesaw MEET Check it out>>>>> http://www.importatlanta.com/forums/...d.php?t=250694
I would own one in a heartbeat. I was actually in the market to buy one. Till i couldn't find one unmodded. And then I drifted into a better selection for what I really needed verus what I wanted.But for sure Best bang for the buck. Super Easy to Mod being y u can't find one unmodded. And Loads of fun from a dig or a roll. But I prefer Rolls mostly
__________________
![]()
2006 GMC Sierra 1500
1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme Brougham Diesel 5.7L Update May 29, 2010
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2961976/1
2005 Suzuki Katana 600
Jet kit, 5 degree advancer,Yoshimura Slip-on, Vortex Sprockets F 14t(-1down) R 50t(+3up)
well by the poll right now its looking like its pretty much 50/50 if you should get a srt-4 or not...
so i guess.. who cares then right?
I personally love them. A friend of mine has had two and just recently traded someone for an evo. Both that he had were pretty quick and it might just be a neon but its a damn fast and a damn good running vehicle for the price.
NIKON Squad member | Nikon D70s
I appreciate how quick they are; there's no denying that, but I'd much rather have a car that's superb in the corners than a simply outright fast car in the straights. Sure it is light and nimble, but there's no getting away from the front wheel drive and the inherent limitations that poses. I like head-pinning acceleration as much as the next guy, but for me, it's all about the cornering.
just FYI A srt-4 with the correct suspension mods can handle with the best of them. And the ACR is a good explanation of that. Its all about money with enough of it anything can handle well and go fast for that matterOriginally Posted by Meatball546
![]()
Neon PoWa
Now Delta 46 equipped
432whp/425wtq on lower boost
Right, but if you compare the "base" models...Originally Posted by Turbd4DE
WRX is an AWD turbocharged car.
Lancer is an N/A RWD (or is it FWD?)
Apples to oranges. The difference here is that while the top models of the Impreza (STi) and Lancer (Evo) are AWD turbo cars, the SRT-4 is still FWD. That's the killer.
They might be hated on for a reason - I've driven one, it wasn't bad, but it's not like driving an STi or an Evo. At all.
Correct Fitment Crew CEO2012 Hyundai Veloster / 1960 Fiat 600D
Because Only Turds Should be Dumped and Flushed.
Lancer is fwd....
Also you gotta consider the price difference when new.. I got my srt-4 with 3 miles on it for 19,000. The Evo I looked at was over 30K along with a STI. Not saying My car is better by no means cause it isn't. And that's why it was 10K less I guess. Diff strokes for diff folks right.
Neon PoWa
Now Delta 46 equipped
432whp/425wtq on lower boost
Indeed.
Ah, the Lancer is FWD? Double fail.![]()
Correct Fitment Crew CEO2012 Hyundai Veloster / 1960 Fiat 600D
Because Only Turds Should be Dumped and Flushed.
i say its honestly up to you but if you want a good turboed car get an sti or evo
if it was that easy then this thread would have never been made.Originally Posted by Ajdgotskillz