Results 1 to 29 of 29

Thread: What's so bad about this?

  1. #1
    BMW Bastard MINI's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Rome
    Age
    34
    Posts
    3,209
    Rep Power
    23

    Default What's so bad about this?




    Rice right?





    This is a 1998 Ex. And since it has a body kit, whale tail, and ricer dual exhaust on a 4 cylinder, it's slow right?

    Well what is so wrong if a car looks like this and has the power to back it up?

    It isn't totally disgusting, The kit it has is one of my favorites.

    Back to the question though, what is wrong with this if it has the power?



    Heres the engine:




    A turbo B16.

    The parts list:
    B16 motor swap, JE 8:1 pistons for turbo and nitrous applications, Eagle rods, civic type-r crankshaft and pulley, Skunk2 High Boost Valves, dual valve springs, crower stage 3 turbo cams, Skunk2 6 bolt adjustable cam gears, AEM high flow fuel rail and regulator, Walbro high flow fuel pump, MSD 6BTM ignition box, MSD blaster SS coil, MSD wires, Fluidyne 3 core radiator, dual FAL fans, completely built, turbonetics 60-1 stage 5 trim, drag manifold, turbonetics raptor wastegate, 3" turbo back exhaust spilt at rear axle into dual exhaust, blitz BOV, Blitz electronic boost controller, greddy turbo timer, nitrous express wet kit.

    Just because it's ricy doesn't mean its slow or lame.
    Got a MINI? Don't talk to me.

    FUCK your FADS

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Atlanta
    Age
    38
    Posts
    2,914
    Rep Power
    23

    Default

    Just because its fast, doesn't mean that I have any respect for it. It looks like shit. Its not like its hard to make a car fast these days, all you need is money.

  3. #3
    Scottish Scotsman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    on the road to recovery
    Age
    46
    Posts
    18,358
    Rep Power
    60

    Default

    i'd rock the shit out of it

  4. #4
    Fuck Your AC130 browningboy7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Age
    38
    Posts
    2,587
    Rep Power
    21

    Default

    I would like the rear bumper if it was single exhaust. The front bumper, eyelids, side skirts, and wheels are all terrible though.

  5. #5
    iamgraphicdesign uproot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    :noitacoL
    Age
    42
    Posts
    7,332
    Rep Power
    34

    Default

    is that an SRT emblem on the back?


















    not that there's anything wrong with that....

  6. #6
    AmbitiousButRubbish EJ25RUN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Daytona Beach
    Age
    38
    Posts
    15,152
    Rep Power
    45

    Default

    Its not as bad as most of the cars like that, but the dual exhaust and the wheels are a turn off for me.

  7. #7
    Fuck Your AC130 browningboy7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Age
    38
    Posts
    2,587
    Rep Power
    21

    Default

    Can you say zero back pressure?

  8. #8
    BMW Bastard MINI's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Rome
    Age
    34
    Posts
    3,209
    Rep Power
    23

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by uproot
    is that an SRT emblem on the back?

    Whoa didnt see that lol. But still. Not necessarily how id style it
    Got a MINI? Don't talk to me.

    FUCK your FADS

  9. #9
    Senior Member | IA Veteran VooDooXII's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Age
    37
    Posts
    9,195
    Rep Power
    34

    Default

    I bet it's quick...the body kit is just a bit to much for me though.

  10. #10
    BMW Bastard MINI's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Rome
    Age
    34
    Posts
    3,209
    Rep Power
    23

    Default

    I like it except the spoiler, eye lids, and rims. Not likin the huge splitters either
    Got a MINI? Don't talk to me.

    FUCK your FADS

  11. #11
    Elite Window Tinting DynamicSound's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Atlanta, Georgia, United States
    Age
    45
    Posts
    3,578
    Rep Power
    22

    Default

    Overall, it is not a bad looking car, I would drive it with some minor changes. The tail is not horrible, but not my style. The body kit is also not horrible, but little over the top...mainly that front bumper needs to go. The eyelids look stupid because they do no line up with his hood. If they started and ended with the edges of the hood, it would be much better. Besides that, it is a good looking car and the power is just a bonus.

  12. #12
    Toyota Tech
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Claxton, GA
    Age
    43
    Posts
    744
    Rep Power
    22

    Default

    speed and power have nothing to do with it looking like ass. its ugly as fuck, and 2000awdturbosuperchargedhorsepower will never change that.

  13. #13
    GOON oneSLOWex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Chattanooga,TN
    Age
    42
    Posts
    18,487
    Rep Power
    50

    Default

    I agree, it looks like poop. I have never liked body kits on Hondas

  14. #14
    Senior Member nreggie454's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Athens/Memphis
    Age
    38
    Posts
    2,602
    Rep Power
    24

    Default

    It looks like crap. I will only give the owner props if he riced out his car to make people think it is slow.
    UGA: Everybody is laughing at us this year.

  15. #15
    Super Ghetto Rally Team EP3sAreFun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Barrows
    Age
    40
    Posts
    2,008
    Rep Power
    25

    Default

    Just cause its got a big parts list doesn't mean its fast. Whats it make? like 200tqe maybe? I say that's slow. *shrug*

    And also, since popular opinion is so important to ya, keep in mind when someone sees a car the exterior is what they see first. If a car is gruesome they may not care to see the engine bay.

    Mine really dosn't leave the garage. People across the street think it is a tool bench.

  16. #16
    Cant take a comment? Got Milk?'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Riversider
    Age
    35
    Posts
    7,017
    Rep Power
    30

    Default

    car is fugly. if it was stock on the outside, i would rock it.

  17. #17
    www.jasontbarker.com speedminded's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    22,589
    Rep Power
    53

    Default

    It's a waste of the engine and turbo setup. It needs to be in the back of an Ariel Atom, Porsche 914, or 1st gen MR2, or maybe up front in a Renualt R5. If it must be FWD then maybe a British Mini.

    I guarantee the body kit to weigh 100% more than stock bumpers with a clean bolt on aerodynamic kit. 17's on that chassis is ridiculous anyways but those wheels are hideous looking. That wings is too bulky, weighs a TON. The headlights being tinted that much have no function. Judging by the cluster fuck of wires around the battery the car has a system...a rather heavy one at that. Dual exhaust is pointless on any inline engine.

  18. #18
    Senior Member Capt._Ron's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Canton
    Posts
    1,018
    Rep Power
    21

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by browningboy7
    Can you say zero back pressure?

    Umm....No..... Can you say turbo??? back pressure isn't really an issue.

  19. #19
    Release the Kracken! Total_Blender's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Bunny Colvin's Hamsterdam
    Age
    44
    Posts
    2,325
    Rep Power
    22

    Default

    I've seen coat-hanger abortions that looked better than that car. I bet it took at least 10 rolls of 3M double sided tape to hold all that crap on there.

  20. #20
    ALL CAPS JITB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Lithonia
    Posts
    20,772
    Rep Power
    58

    Default

    dont u all get tired of lookin at stock bodied hondas?

    id change the wheels, and take the spoiler off.. and it wouldnt be too bad. looks like the body work has been done well.. And prob is cleaner than half the hondas on IA, body wise...lol

  21. #21
    Fuck Your AC130 browningboy7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Age
    38
    Posts
    2,587
    Rep Power
    21

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Capt._Ron
    Umm....No..... Can you say turbo??? back pressure isn't really an issue.
    umm....No...The bigger the exhaust, the more laggy the turbo will be. More backpressure loads the turbo quicker and therefore makes it spool quicker, So it really depends on where you want your powerband.

  22. #22
    ALL CAPS JITB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Lithonia
    Posts
    20,772
    Rep Power
    58

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by browningboy7
    umm....No...The bigger the exhaust, the more laggy the turbo will be. More backpressure loads the turbo quicker and therefore makes it spool quicker, So it really depends on where you want your powerband.

    look at the size of his downpipe..

  23. #23
    Senior Member | IA Veteran Elbow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Atlanta
    Posts
    29,397
    Rep Power
    66

    Default

    It looks like crap, whether you are a poser saying you like it to be different then the stockish JDM fad guys, or you are a lame JDM fad guy. The front bumper is rice, the wing, the wheels, etc. I don't hate all body kits, this one is ugly, it's not functional, and a Civic with duals? No.

  24. #24
    www.jasontbarker.com speedminded's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    22,589
    Rep Power
    53

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by browningboy7
    umm....No...The bigger the exhaust, the more laggy the turbo will be. More backpressure loads the turbo quicker and therefore makes it spool quicker, So it really depends on where you want your powerband.
    Are you fucking kidding me?

    You're joking right?

    Really?

    You must have read the David Koresh Turbo for Dummies book. Dude, step away from cars and go live under a rock. Please remember down the street not across the road.

    Is this your car? If would be fitting, lol!

  25. #25
    JDM TYTE AnthonyF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Cumming
    Posts
    24,318
    Rep Power
    61

    Default

    I'd drive it. I've never cared for that front bumper. It sticks out too far on the sides. the rear...eh...at least it all matches and the exhaust isnt hanging down.

    -Ant.
    The Carbon Fibered R6

  26. #26
    Turbo-Wired
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    East Cobb
    Age
    39
    Posts
    825
    Rep Power
    18

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by speedminded
    It's a waste of the engine and turbo setup. It needs to be in the back of an Ariel Atom, Porsche 914, or 1st gen MR2, or maybe up front in a Renualt R5. If it must be FWD then maybe a British Mini.

    I guarantee the body kit to weigh 100% more than stock bumpers with a clean bolt on aerodynamic kit. 17's on that chassis is ridiculous anyways but those wheels are hideous looking. That wings is too bulky, weighs a TON. The headlights being tinted that much have no function. Judging by the cluster fuck of wires around the battery the car has a system...a rather heavy one at that. Dual exhaust is pointless on any inline engine.
    So you're saying there's no reason any Inline should have a dual exhaust? Even perhaps an RB25DET pushing 11psi and 350hp that went from a 3" single pipe to twin 2.25" pipes split after the turbo because of clearance issues in a 240z? Let's be honest, most V6's don't "need" dual exhausts, and neither do most V8's. It's not about having the dual muffler exits, it's about having enough flow, and a single big pipe isn't always the best way to achieve that.

  27. #27
    BMW Bastard MINI's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Rome
    Age
    34
    Posts
    3,209
    Rep Power
    23

    Default

    I wonder If it has neons....


    Got a MINI? Don't talk to me.

    FUCK your FADS

  28. #28
    www.jasontbarker.com speedminded's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    22,589
    Rep Power
    53

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kaiser
    So you're saying there's no reason any Inline should have a dual exhaust? Even perhaps an RB25DET pushing 11psi and 350hp that went from a 3" single pipe to twin 2.25" pipes split after the turbo because of clearance issues in a 240z? Let's be honest, most V6's don't "need" dual exhausts, and neither do most V8's. It's not about having the dual muffler exits, it's about having enough flow, and a single big pipe isn't always the best way to achieve that.
    Come back when you understand what exhaust scavenging and computational fluid dynamics is.

  29. #29
    VTECKLR amped4life33's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Rome Ga
    Age
    36
    Posts
    404
    Rep Power
    18

    Default

    I never have minded bulky body kits as long as they wernt cheap lookin and they fit the car right. I even like some obnoxious spoilers(not that one tho). The problem i have with it is that its FWD. I dont like FWD cars, end of story.
    **Original photo by CF Photography**

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
About us
ImportAtlanta is a community of gearheads and car enthusiasts. It does not matter what kind of car or bike you drive, IA is an open community for any gearhead. Whether you're looking for advice on a performance build or posting your wheels for sale, you're welcome here!
Announcement
Welcome back to ImportAtlanta. We are currently undergoing many changes, so please report any issues you encounter with the site using the 'Contact Us' button below. Thank you!