Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 41 to 51 of 51

Thread: Current Mustang....... Why has no one tried this?

  1. 03-07-2008, 05:10 PM #41
    man
    man is offline
    Senior Member | IA Veteran man's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Age
    39
    Posts
    6,690
    Rep Power
    29

    Default

    The tails are the only things I dislike on the GT500, maybe that why no one does it...

    lol
    IA Rules doesn't allow these images in sigs

    - IA Mgmt
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 03-09-2008, 03:46 PM #42
    Ronsam2006
    Ronsam2006 is offline
    ATL's Slow3st DSM!!! Ronsam2006's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Atlanta
    Age
    37
    Posts
    2,098
    Rep Power
    21

    Default

    I dunno but to me the old skool mustangs just looked more sleeker and sportier than these new bulkier stangs.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 03-09-2008, 05:33 PM #43
    Catnip
    Catnip is offline
    Senior Member | IA Veteran Catnip's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Age
    35
    Posts
    19,743
    Rep Power
    48

    Default

    Do you really think a saleen is ugly?

    wtf. gtfo. now.
    saleens are straight sex on wheels.

    -rep
    '92 C2500 6.5 Turbo Diesel | '96 240sx
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 03-09-2008, 05:35 PM #44
    Deke
    Deke is offline
    Never go full retard
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Nashville
    Age
    39
    Posts
    3,258
    Rep Power
    25

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ronsam2006
    I dunno but to me the old skool mustangs just looked more sleeker and sportier than these new bulkier stangs.
    If you're talking about old skool as in '64-'69 I agree 100%. Although I do think that the latest body style is the best looking one since the '69 fastback.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. 03-09-2008, 05:43 PM #45
    EJ25RUN
    EJ25RUN is offline
    AmbitiousButRubbish EJ25RUN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Daytona Beach
    Age
    38
    Posts
    15,152
    Rep Power
    45

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cgEvan
    Do you really think a saleen is ugly?

    wtf. gtfo. now.
    saleens are straight sex on wheels.

    -rep
    Ahh?

    you just pos repped me....

    But anyways... Saleens look good to some but not to me. I especially dislike the wheels. It looks like a poor bodykit was wrapped over the car.

    Read this comparo between the Roush, Saleen, and Shelby and see which one is best for yourself.

    http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...mparison_test/

    I think the Shelby (yellow) is the best look for a stang. I just would want that 67 Shelby GT500 rear on mine.

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. 03-09-2008, 05:49 PM #46
    EJ25RUN
    EJ25RUN is offline
    AmbitiousButRubbish EJ25RUN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Daytona Beach
    Age
    38
    Posts
    15,152
    Rep Power
    45

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Deke
    If you're talking about old skool as in '64-'69 I agree 100%. Although I do think that the latest body style is the best looking one since the '69 fastback.
    Naw man.... the 70 was the sh!t too (this is likly the next look for a Mustang)



    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  7. 03-09-2008, 06:01 PM #47
    Deke
    Deke is offline
    Never go full retard
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Nashville
    Age
    39
    Posts
    3,258
    Rep Power
    25

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by EJ25RUN
    Naw man.... the 70 was the sh!t too (this is likly the next look for a Mustang)



    Touche, The 1969 and 1970 fastbacks were very similar. The '69s just had those sexy little scoops behind the doors

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  8. 03-09-2008, 09:58 PM #48
    Catnip
    Catnip is offline
    Senior Member | IA Veteran Catnip's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Age
    35
    Posts
    19,743
    Rep Power
    48

    Default

    lmao, oops. you should + rep me back then.
    '92 C2500 6.5 Turbo Diesel | '96 240sx
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  9. 03-09-2008, 10:38 PM #49
    SandM
    SandM is offline
    always dirty.... SandM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    L'ville
    Age
    39
    Posts
    2,852
    Rep Power
    24

    Default

    Roush 427R FTW


    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  10. 03-09-2008, 11:31 PM #50
    EJ25RUN
    EJ25RUN is offline
    AmbitiousButRubbish EJ25RUN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Daytona Beach
    Age
    38
    Posts
    15,152
    Rep Power
    45

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cgEvan
    lmao, oops. you should + rep me back then.
    no, you didn't earn any.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  11. 03-10-2008, 06:32 AM #51
    DieselNuts
    DieselNuts is offline
    sukanigadikosum DieselNuts's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    niggaville USA;via, Atlanta, Georgia
    Posts
    7,907
    Rep Power
    32

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Deke
    Touche, The 1969 and 1970 fastbacks were very similar. The '69s just had those sexy little scoops behind the doors

    They also had a 3rd and 4th headlight where the scoops are on the 70.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
« Curious about JRZ coilovers | Question about sr20...need a answer asap! »

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules

About us
ImportAtlanta is a community of gearheads and car enthusiasts. It does not matter what kind of car or bike you drive, IA is an open community for any gearhead. Whether you're looking for advice on a performance build or posting your wheels for sale, you're welcome here!
Announcement
Welcome back to ImportAtlanta. We are currently undergoing many changes, so please report any issues you encounter with the site using the 'Contact Us' button below. Thank you!