Old school Civic turbo back in the 80s. I think honda went 20 years without a boosted car before the RDX.Originally Posted by JDMrequired
How bout a high revvin boostin subaru? Best of both worlds.Originally Posted by THX712517
NA IS BEST!!!!!
BOOST IS BETTER!!!!
Old school Civic turbo back in the 80s. I think honda went 20 years without a boosted car before the RDX.Originally Posted by JDMrequired
How bout a high revvin boostin subaru? Best of both worlds.Originally Posted by THX712517
02 WRX Sport Wagon
for real...now my post just looks stupidOriginally Posted by GTScoob
+1 for you
oh **** you're right. now i feel double stupid +1 for you tooOriginally Posted by DoriDori
Originally Posted by Nemesis
your so humbleOriginally Posted by JDMrequired
i'll agree with the most part of things that have been said,.....
NA commands ALOT more respect b/c its required time, effort, blood, sweat, tears. not to say boost doesn't but to see a 250 hp car NA is ALOT more impressive 250 hp boosted.
boosting any Type R![]()
![]()
![]()
hondas were meant to scream without the assistance of a snail.
What do you think about turboing a F20C or F22C? Just wonderingOriginally Posted by PURE jdm
Boooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Originally Posted by DoriDori
ssssssssssssttttttttttttttttt!!!!! your so close joe!!! Just finish that statement lolol. We all know that deep down youd love a boosted B16 in your EG. hahaOriginally Posted by JDMjoe86