Kumho Ecsta AST vs. Falken Ziex 512. Later, QD.
Kumho
Falken
Kumho Ecsta AST vs. Falken Ziex 512. Later, QD.
Last edited by quickdodgeŽ; 10-04-2007 at 03:31 PM.
falken rt 615. i heard good things about those.
never dealt with falkens...
BUT kelly uses khumo on her dd civic and they have always held up great and been good tires...
Those are like two completely different ends of the spectrum IMO. Falken all the way.
***Lotus Elise***
BlackWatchRacing/Sector111/Larini Exhausts/Difflow Diffusers/Classic Livery of Atlanta Paint/APR Performance
Kumho
JDM = Just a Dumb MotherFu**er...![]()
FIRST OFF, I SELL TIRES, AND THE KUMHO IS A STIFFER TIRE... LONGER LIFE. AND THE FALKNE IS A SOFTER TIRE...
NIKOND80
PG+K
Ok? Later, QD.Originally Posted by burke420
i have the falken 512s, they are ok, definitely not as good as the kumho SPTs. I never tried the ASTs. Unless I was going with the RT615s, I would always go kumho.
OMG THIS GUY SELLS TIRES!!!!Originally Posted by burke420
BTW: I'll take my falken azenis over any kumho tire.
***Lotus Elise***
BlackWatchRacing/Sector111/Larini Exhausts/Difflow Diffusers/Classic Livery of Atlanta Paint/APR Performance
Originally Posted by Kyle
i hope your not talking about the 512s lol
Yeah I don't remember what I have. But everyone I know buys kumho ecstas and they are crap IMO.Originally Posted by plv
***Lotus Elise***
BlackWatchRacing/Sector111/Larini Exhausts/Difflow Diffusers/Classic Livery of Atlanta Paint/APR Performance
Lolol. Yeah, my thread wasn't asking who sold tires. Any body can learn how to sell tires, so just because someone does doesn't mean they know all about them. I want people who have ridden on these tires to give road experience on them, not what you read in tire-selling class or on a brochure.Originally Posted by Kyle
Azenis aren't in my budget. Later, QD.Originally Posted by Kyle
Back in 1999-2000, I did SCCA on Kumho 710(712 now) and won the championship on them and only used one set the whole year. And this was also my daily driven car. Later, QD.Originally Posted by Kyle
falken eh. Soem ppl have extremely bad luck with em. Though they say they protect the rims ahaha its bs. I like Kumho.,
Bfgoodrich kdw's
But if I had to pick from those two I'd go with the Falkens.
sponsored by: workhard motorsports. // tuned by
That settles it:Originally Posted by Maniac
Kumhos it is. Later, QD.
Lofl. Good.
sponsored by: workhard motorsports. // tuned by
Kumho
Exactly.Originally Posted by quickdodgeŽ
They probably wouldnt be in mine either, but two of them came on my wheels, so it wasnt that bad for me.Originally Posted by quickdodgeŽ
***Lotus Elise***
BlackWatchRacing/Sector111/Larini Exhausts/Difflow Diffusers/Classic Livery of Atlanta Paint/APR Performance
Wooooowww! aint this sum stuff. me and thecoolcutter were just pming back and forth about this. tHE EXACT Same too tires!
i think we're both leaning more towards the 512's![]()
Falken 512's. Very soft compound tire, and wears away quick... I won't get it again.. I say Kumho.
I have had three sets of 512's on 2 cars and for the money i have not found much better for driving daily. what car is it going on and what are you planning on doing? I would also suggest looking at the nitto neo gens.
I've had both. I preferred the Falkens. With the same width and aspect ratio, the 512's just had better "road feel." I'm now on Yokohama AVS ES100s and love them.
thats why I say Kumho A+ said
I've had both, and I personally prefer the falkens. I know this isn't saying much, but I worked at a tire wholesaler for a while, and we sold probably 10x as many ZE512 as Ecsta's. I've got a set of Yokohama-made 205/70/15s I'll sell ya for cheap./shameless plug
Just my GA with no mods and none planned. And no to the Nitto as I am working with a budget.Originally Posted by wantboost
As far as I know, that won't fit on a 16" rim. Later, QD.Originally Posted by KPowerEP3
FALKEN FTMFW!
they arent THAT expensive... ~$70/tire.
and they have SO much more grip.
but bridgestone has the fastest street tire out right now with the re01-r
The server is too busy at the moment. Please try again later.
doh. owned by bigger-than-I-thought wheels.Originally Posted by quickdodgeŽ
Reading is fundamental.Originally Posted by jesse4846
^^^Originally Posted by jesse4846
Later, QD.Originally Posted by quickdodgeŽ
QD just to let you know about Falkens Ze 512's they arent makeing them anymore they have been replaced with the ZE 912's. Great tires i have 912 on my car and it rides great
Originally Posted by Boomer27
Thanks, but I got the Kumhos. Lolol. Later, QD.
I've got Falken FK452's and they're great, i've heard good things about the ziex as well!
I've driven a little on Falken's, and I have 2 Ecsta AST's on my car right now.
I'd honestly go with the Falken's.
Kumho's are more budget friendly for the feel and performance.
Should have broadened your horizons and looked into Federal 695 Super Steel. It's cheaper, same touring **** that wont have any real grip, and its cheap!
Later, MS95.
What are you using it for?
What is your budget per tire?
1997 M3/4/5
2004 X4 4.4i
1987 325iS 24V 6speed
I actually went with Hankooks.Originally Posted by mikespeed95
I have Kuhmo Ecsta's on my car right now and I love them. My only complaint is they are not very progressive when they lose traction at the limit (which is pretty F-ing high). But, I am also running a staggered tire size so my assesment may not be fair one. Could be more my set-up than the tire.
I'm not sure if that would affect it, but it could be. I went with Hankook for the price and since I didn't need a "racing" type tire on my daily cruiser. They are VR rated and have a " Treadwear/Temperature/Traction" rating of "340/A/A." So for $400 even(including all fees), I think I got a fairly good deal. And they ride great, too. I have zero road noise and the ride is smooth. Later, QD.Originally Posted by Echonova