engine VR38DETT V6
aspiration Twin Turbocharged
length 4650 mm / 183.1 in
width 2800 mm / 110.2 in
height 1920 mm / 75.6 in
found here http://www.supercars.net/cars/3842.html its not alot but just something i came across!!!
engine VR38DETT V6
aspiration Twin Turbocharged
length 4650 mm / 183.1 in
width 2800 mm / 110.2 in
height 1920 mm / 75.6 in
found here http://www.supercars.net/cars/3842.html its not alot but just something i came across!!!
Life is a thought, think about it.
nice find. i am waiting for nissan to take deposits. i am ready
Resize sig area!
Simon, what's so bad about it? It seems ok to me.
BUY MY NEW BOOK! ITS CALLED, IF YOU LIKE IMPORTANTLANTA THERE'S A STRONG CHANCE YOU'RE A FAGGOT
they already are taking depostits
Epic Foxbody Thread Crew Member #10Originally Posted by AlanŽ
I checked last week. they said another monthOriginally Posted by redGT
Resize sig area!
I would get the '09 or '10 model if anything!
Leisa and S. 4 Life NM?
y is it on a supercar website?
skylines are not supercars,their barely sports cars
Originally Posted by HypnoToad
You made 1 false statement
Can you find it?
Leisa and S. 4 Life NM?
nope,explainOriginally Posted by Kevykev
^^Originally Posted by HypnoToad
Originally Posted by Kevykev
I found it!its "they're" or "they are" not "their"
![]()
![]()
LOL, I was gonna put that too.Originally Posted by Nittanys1
IA Rules doesn't allow these images in sigs
- IA Mgmt
Originally Posted by Nittanys1
Hahaaa
I decided not to stray from my original intentions
Leisa and S. 4 Life NM?
Originally Posted by HypnoToad
What in God's name is that man!
?
Leisa and S. 4 Life NM?
im sorry,but when i think japanesse sport cars...i dont think skyline,hell 300zx is more sportscar than a skyline...yea yea thier fast,but they dont have wow factor like a RX-7 or Supra,or even a 3000GTOriginally Posted by Kevykev
Wow, that's clearly your personal opinion. i've honestly never heard someone say that the skyline lacked a "WOW Factor"Originally Posted by HypnoToad
Wow!![]()
Leisa and S. 4 Life NM?
yea,u should never ask me bout skylines cause im pretty biased against them,i just think get to much cred sometimes as the greast JDM car ever...but i hope u agree that skylines arent supercars,lolOriginally Posted by Kevykev
![]()
well supercars.net started out as just supercars. ppl loved their write ups about the cars that they suggested that they put all lev's of sports cars on the page. It turned out to be a huge hit so they just started putting anything labeled as a sports car on there.Originally Posted by HypnoToad
Life is a thought, think about it.
So what kind of deposit we looking at here?
When will people learn? That's not a Nissan Skyline. That's the Nissan GT-R.
Nissan has give their new model a distinctive name, GT-R, and not using the Skyline Prefix because people often mistook the GT-R as the regular Skyline. The GT-R used to be a special production line of the Nissan Skyline. But since people are often forget and overused the Term Skyline for every GT-R there is. From now on, there won't be any Nissan Skyline GT-R.
It'll be the Nissan Skyline generations = Infiniti G series. And its own Nissan GT-R.
Nissan Skyline 350GT = Infiniti G35
Nissan Skyline 370GT = Infiniti G37
Nissan GT-R = Nissan GT-R
I agree that past model GT-R's aren't supercars, but considering the hype and advertised performance the new model is supposed to lay down it could break into "supercar" territory. Of course, that all depends on what you consider a "supercar" as opposed to a super car.
I still think the new GT-R is rather uninspiring, primarily due to the C-pillar. I do look forward to seeing what kind of numbers it will put down once on the street though.
Meh, it's not super car material, not even close. Speed isn't the only thing that makes a super car, other wise there would be hundreds of Supra "super cars"![]()
IA Rules doesn't allow these images in sigs
- IA Mgmt
exactlyOriginally Posted by fcman
cars that come to mind when i think supercar is Mclaren F1 or Jaguar XJ220
the nissan GTR is not on that level,there are very few japanesse cars if any that are on that level
Please define me a supercar. There's speed, handling, aerodynamics, ect...Originally Posted by fcman
The new GT-R is supposed to be pumping out some heavy horses, the suspension tweaked on the Nurburgring(sp?), aerodynamics have been altered to help stabalize the car (note ugly C-Pillar), and the interior is a hell of a lot more attractive than the baby-sh*t colored suede in the new Lambo.
They do aerodynamics testing on minivans. Losing the look of your C pillars is not a commitment to aero. Designing the car from ground up with aerodynamics in mind is what makes a super car. Suspension tweaking means nothing, any car can have a good suspension, but not every car can have a good chassis, and the GT-R isn't going to be able to even come close to modern super cars at its price. And the interior, you're absolutely insane if you think it looks better than a Lambo. Plus it's not about looks, it's about quality, cheap plastics can look great, but at the end, you're polishing a turd.Originally Posted by Ran
IA Rules doesn't allow these images in sigs
- IA Mgmt
Dude I agree with you on some points, but Quality and Lamborghini should not be in the same sentence. Lambos are probably the cheapest peices of **** supercars out of them all that just happens to cost a lot.Originally Posted by fcman
A great example of quality is Ferrari.
Last I checked, the new GT-R was built from the ground up to challenge the Porsche 911 Turbo and the Carrera GT. Are you saying the GT-R just doesn't have a good chassis? Also, at the price under $100,000 I'd say it's pretty competitive for it's price range.Originally Posted by fcman
Lambo has always looked like a Down Syndrome Ferrari built with Legos.Originally Posted by fcman
I don't know about you, but I'd rather have good looking cheap plastic than some hideous material that just happens to cost a lot.Originally Posted by fcman
lol........quit sipping on the haterade
thats all that is left to drink....i'm out of beer...
I got some Goldschlager...Originally Posted by Nittanys1
IA Rules doesn't allow these images in sigs
- IA Mgmt
uh ohOriginally Posted by fcman
![]()
that s h i t is ugly.
www.MSSRACING.com - 99 Civic CX - Best ET: 9.53 / Best MPH: 160 - Competition Clutch - Arias Pistons - Coatings M.D. - Mahle-Clevite - ebtec - AHobbs Racing - JKOBD - TDC Performance
Daily D: 2007 Dodge 2500 MEGA CAB, Cummins Turbo Diesel
It does not mention that with a 200 lb driver it will weigh almost 4000 lbs. It's a nice car but jesus how about a little carbon fiber. Look at the ZO6, it will cost the same and has carbon fiber and plastic all over it, not to mention balsa wood.Originally Posted by neoP5
If the Z06 is listed in the Supercars class, then the GT-R has more rights to be in that class. NSX was also ranked among the supercars class.
What the GT-R isn't, is the Exotic.
Power, handling, look, the GT-R has all that comparable to the top exotics. However, it's still not an exotic car.
Most of the time, people often associate supercars as Exotic cars, they're not. They are two different classes. Well, at least to my opinions.
I often compare them, metaphorically, as sport and luxury sport. Just because the car is a sport car, doesn't make it a luxury sport. The same concept applies to supercars and Exotic.
Originally Posted by ATK_Designs
they put the Z06 as a supercar?![]()
@ 70k I will not be purchasing that
Better **** to do with my dough!
Leisa and S. 4 Life NM?
but I willOriginally Posted by Kevykev
Resize sig area!
Originally Posted by WHAT_LAG
70k is right on the borderline of "Damn?Can i afford this / Damn I should buy this ****"
If you buy it, I will have you RAPED!
Leisa and S. 4 Life NM?