Quote Originally Posted by civic95
They just want to cover other segments. That photo is a spy photo. The cars real lines are camouflaged. 2 seat sports cars aren't practical. How many people can afford a $100K+ weekend toy and a nice daily driver? A lot more can afford 1 $50K-$100K car that's practical enough to use everyday.
They can buy a Mercedes, Jaguar...or if you want to go into the $100,000s, then a Quattroporte. I know it's a spy photo though...a disguised running prototype.

Quote Originally Posted by civic95
I never thought the Cayenne would be such a sucess. I would never pay the price for one. Even if I was rich. The price difference between the non-turbo and turbo model is ludacris.
Agreed...and the Turbo S is just barely faster than the Turbo. Not to mention, they look terrible.

Quote Originally Posted by civic95
People thought the boxster was a joke when it came out. A lot didn't consider it powerful enough to be a sports car. But look how many you see on the road.
I think the Boxter is a great car...the Cayman's even better. I equate it to the 914. Sports cars aren't just about power either...the Boxter and the Cayman are excellent drivers. In fact, some magazines say that the Cayman drives better than the 911, and magazines LOVE the 911.

Quote Originally Posted by civic95
Does it hurt the brand to do this? Well maybe you won't consider a porsche anymore. But for everyone of you, they just opened the door for 5 more who now see something practical being offered. It's all about money, and having a larger customer base. That's business.
It hurts the brand in the minds of enthusiasts. It better be something special...it shouldn't just be another floaty luxury sedan with a Porsche body and badge. I don't know how many doors they've opened though...haha, I don't know how many people will really find it attractive. I know what you mean though...I mean why do you think Subaru reinvented the Toyota Camry with their new Impreza?