A miller cycle engine is basicly like this: During the intake process, as the piston goes down, the intake valve opens with it. on a regular Otto cycle engine (conventional), the valve is about closed when the piston reaches bottom dead center and as the piston returns back up, it's pressurizing the cylinder to make the most power. The miller cycle engine on the other hand stays open most of the time during the combustion process. Though not as much as staying in, it better promotes a better swirl for better gas mileage at the cost of not as much power. The stock Miller cycle engine (2.3L S/C V6) gets 2 mpg city / 1 mpg hwy better than the stock Millenia 2.5L and out powers it by 40 hp/40 ft lbs.Originally Posted by VooDooXII
I think the technology was wasted, personally. It could've went towards a twin scroll turbo to get basicly the same gas mileage and still have enough space to do anything. Everything was expensive on the car, but they were reliable. I hope the Mazda 9 don't have a miller cycle engine.