2 pussy's fighting at Barett : ZOSICK vs another!

[tnomud]

You guys are running off on a tangent here. I was just making a point that he was very lucky that someone didn't put a few slugs in him....thats all. These situations escalate quickly, legal or illegal, right or wrong.

Personally, had someone punched me from behind and actually made contact like that, a 10mm Georgia Arms Hollowpoint would have put a large portion of his lungs on the back window of his car. But, that's how I would have handled it. I have great attorneys and would deal with the mess.

Not everyone would react like me, and some would do nothing. But, my point is, there are poeple out there with varying opinions on how to handle it. He is lucky, thats all. Just as I am the few times that I have popped people in the face at intersections, restaraunts, and waddings in the heat of the moment.

[Vteckidd]

Personally, had someone punched me from behind and actually made contact like that, a 10mm Georgia Arms Hollowpoint would have put a large portion of his lungs on the back window of his car. But, that's how I would have handled it. I have great attorneys and would deal with the mess.

:

SO youre basically saying anyone who swings at you youll blow them away? Just doesnt make much sense to me.

I was always taught to only use a gun if you have no other option, and if youre in danger for your life. If someone throws a punch at me, im punching back even if i do have my .40 on me, just because i dont think being punched warrants killing someone.

As a gun owner you have a responsibility to be smarter than using the weapon as a retaliation tool. You have a duty to respect its use and no when to use it. you also have a responsibility to DIFFUSE a potentially hostile situation FIRST. THe fact there are several people in here advocating shooting someone and killing them because of 1 punch to the back of the head when theres 100 people around, just shows how immature and uninformed people are.

Not you personally sir, just in general

[David88vert]

SO youre basically saying anyone who swings at you youll blow them away? Just doesnt make much sense to me.

I was always taught to only use a gun if you have no other option, and if youre in danger for your life. If someone throws a punch at me, im punching back even if i do have my .40 on me, just because i dont think being punched warrants killing someone.

As a gun owner you have a responsibility to be smarter than using the weapon as a retaliation tool. You have a duty to respect its use and no when to use it. you also have a responsibility to DIFFUSE a potentially hostile situation FIRST. THe fact there are several people in here advocating shooting someone and killing them because of 1 punch to the back of the head when theres 100 people around, just shows how immature and uninformed people are.

Not you personally sir, just in general

If you have a firearm on you, you do not want to get into a fistfight. First, you obviously could lose control of the weapon and have it used on you. However, even if it stays in its holster, you will still face more serious charges just by having a weapon on your person. You would be better off to avoid any situations in the first place, but if you have a weapon on yuo, you had better be prepared to use it. Check with your lawyer, and he will tell you the same.

[Vteckidd]

If you have a firearm on you, you do not want to get into a fistfight. First, you obviously could lose control of the weapon and have it used on you. However, even if it stays in its holster, you will still face more serious charges just by having a weapon on your person. You would be better off to avoid any situations in the first place, but if you have a weapon on yuo, you had better be prepared to use it. Check with your lawyer, and he will tell you the same.

I meant on as in around me (in my car, within my reach , etc) I almost never carry on me because I just dont feel the need to. I know some people like it and thats fine, i just dont feel the need to.

If i was going to a car meet, i wouldnt be carrying a gun on me, it would be in my car.

I know some people will say "Oh well whats the point then", my point is there are too many hot heads already walking around with guns, we dont need 1 more (ME) lol

My main point is if someone punches me im not shooting them.


EDIT: But i do agree with you 100%, if kid was carrying hes better off retreating and diffusing the situation which goes back to what i said earlier, as a gun owner you have a responsibility to diffuse the situation and put yourself in a position NOT to use your weapon

[tnomud]

SO youre basically saying anyone who swings at you youll blow them away? Just doesnt make much sense to me.

I was always taught to only use a gun if you have no other option, and if youre in danger for your life. If someone throws a punch at me, im punching back even if i do have my .40 on me, just because i dont think being punched warrants killing someone.

As a gun owner you have a responsibility to be smarter than using the weapon as a retaliation tool. You have a duty to respect its use and no when to use it. you also have a responsibility to DIFFUSE a potentially hostile situation FIRST. THe fact there are several people in here advocating shooting someone and killing them because of 1 punch to the back of the head when theres 100 people around, just shows how immature and uninformed people are.

Not you personally sir, just in general

I am old, do not cause trouble, and carry multiple weapons at all times. I also shoot competitively (handguns and rifles). I am not asking anyone to agree with me at all. But, I am perfectly capable of shooting just the target that I want, without harming others. I am well aware of the laws, more than most. To me, a punch to the back of the head falls under "reasonable threat" and gets a lead reward. I have good attorneys, that's how I roll. Where I live, the cops will give you a pat on the back for making their job easier. If I am in the wrong, then I am prepared to deal with it.

NOTE: I also rarely attend larges gatherings of hooligans, thugs, and volatile situations.

[Vteckidd]

I am old, do not cause trouble, and carry multiple weapons at all times. I also shoot competitively (handguns and rifles). I am not asking anyone to agree with me at all. But, I am perfectly capable of shooting just the target that I want, without harming others. I am well aware of the laws, more than most. To me, a punch to the back of the head falls under "reasonable threat" and gets a lead reward. I have good attorneys, that's how I roll. Where I live, the cops will give you a pat on the back for making their job easier. If I am in the wrong, then I am prepared to deal with it.

NOTE: I also rarely attend larges gatherings of hooligans, thugs, and volatile situations.

*Makes mental note never to punch you*

haha

[tnomud]

*Makes mental note never to punch you*

haha

It's fine if you do not agree, not eveyone does. But, I have a friend in prison for the rest of his life for one punch. A single punch to a guy who was hitting on him (he is not gay). That single punch knocked the guy out, he fell back, hit head on sidewalk, and died. A strong hit the the back of the head can paralize and/or kill immediately. To me, at my age, even being a superbadassmothafucka, I'd rather spend 20 behind bars, than 50 in a wheelchair, wearing a helmet and a drooolcup.

[David88vert]

NOTE: I also rarely attend larges gatherings of hooligans, thugs, and volatile situations.

Correct solution.

[Vteckidd]

Correct solution.

:thumbup: