Oh dude I'm so sorry, this really suck!

What I've learn from experience that:
  1. They have to be able to proof behond doubt that you where going XXXmph
  2. If they charge you for going 125mph and they review you were going 100mph you are not guilty period! b/c they said 125 and you were actually driving at 100mph.
  3. If they did not get the other guy to say that you were racing then, it will be a matter of opinion. The cop sill testify that see believe see you racing and you will say that you were accelerating profusely. That by any means you and the "other" guy were trying to find out how had the fastest car (no competition, no race).
If you get a lawyer familiar with the charges will give you heads up in getting a good reduce sentence or even to dismissed the case.

Most lawyer want to get your money easy by getting you a deal were they do not work for the money, and the court like them for not trying hard enough.

Remember that all evidence can be review by your lawyer, and all existent evidence has to be sited in the court records prior to trial; so do not let them scare you by the typical "we have it on video" or "we have a cop that saw you racing" all that could be true, if the subpoena the witness (cop that saw you) and enter all the evidence into the system.

I hope that helps.... I know you might be asking your self millions of questions...

 __________________________________________________ ___________________________


One time a friend of mine was driving at about 100mph when other driver in driving a Camaro trying to do a fly by passed a cop at over 100mph; at that point the cop chase the Camaro and thought that my friend was racing the Camaro.

The cop pulled over my friend for racing or getting into an "act" of attempting to proof hows car was faster.... Case was dismissed later on.


Is very hard to proof that you were racing, unless they can proof an stablish start/end and identify the vehicles/drivers. Or by someone saying "I'm sorry I was racing" but who would do that, right?