View Full Version : Misc Which HDTV is better?
Eurostunna07
12-15-2006, 03:38 PM
http://images.bestbuy.com/BestBuy_US/images/global/misc/spacer.gif
Samsung 30" SlimFit Flat-Tube HDTV
Samsung tv (http://www.bestbuy.com/site/olspage.jsp?skuId=7908062&st=hdtv&lp=3&type=product&cp=1&id=1149207784284)
LG SuperSlim 30" Stereo HDTV
LG tv (http://www.bestbuy.com/site/olspage.jsp?skuId=7685089&st=LG+hdtv&lp=6&type=product&cp=1&id=1134703573897)
Both 599.99 open box item, nothing wrong with them, dont know which one to grab.
Eurostunna07
12-15-2006, 04:06 PM
No one here knows much about HDtvs??? ..-.-;
Eurostunna07
12-15-2006, 04:50 PM
oh well, nvm. then d'Oh.
Fast Shadow
12-15-2006, 05:18 PM
Wow you waited a whole 28 minutes for an answer.
ShooterMcGavin
12-15-2006, 05:39 PM
i'd say samsung but i'm sure there isn't much difference...
DemonEyez
12-15-2006, 07:10 PM
samsung over lg..
but otherwise neither.
TeeJay
12-15-2006, 10:54 PM
LG is korean, id take japan over korea, other than that its the same lol
StupidBikerBoy
12-16-2006, 06:12 PM
What type of HD are they?
Are they 720 or 1080?
Are they progressive scan?
DemonEyez
12-16-2006, 11:34 PM
What type of HD are they?
Are they 720 or 1080?
Are they progressive scan?
their 30" tv's.. thier not gonna be 1080p so thats out
their 99.99% always gonna be a 720p setup which can take a 1080i signal.
And 720p , the p is for progressive. In the case of these 2 tv's they will take any signal and display it in 720p so they are "progressive scan" but its done on the tv side.
Demsum
12-16-2006, 11:38 PM
Samsung is better. LG is a very good entry level set though. But Sony's 34" xbr tube set trumps them all.
StupidBikerBoy
12-17-2006, 01:49 AM
their 30" tv's.. thier not gonna be 1080p so thats out
their 99.99% always gonna be a 720p setup which can take a 1080i signal.
And 720p , the p is for progressive. In the case of these 2 tv's they will take any signal and display it in 720p so they are "progressive scan" but its done on the tv side.
I know this, just didn't read the tv size.
Regardless, all these factors come into play to determine the best deal, which is why I asked. Unless he's just speaking on a manufacturor basis.
In that case I would lean to Samsung.
ironchef
12-19-2006, 02:25 PM
LG is korean, id take japan over korea, other than that its the same lolYou do know samsung is korean right?
DemonEyez
12-19-2006, 05:02 PM
You do know samsung is korean right?
yes but samsung and sony colaborated on the new samsung factories in korea. Cheaper to make it there + work force cheaper there than in japan. Also when this happened they signed a deal to share technology in which realisitically samsung is using nearly all sony technology except for their Image processors, like wega, bravia etc.
So its basically korean in korea with sony's technology.
collins
12-19-2006, 05:53 PM
Samsung is better. LG is a very good entry level set though. But Sony's 34" xbr tube set trumps them all. maybe so, but have you ever tried to pick up that damn sony? DAS A HUUUGE BITCH! plus its pushin 200lbs
Samsung hands down!! Samsung and Sony TV's have the best picture out there. The Sharp Aquos is coming in a close thirds. Then I would put Phillips in fourth. LG is a decent company, but for the money if you can get the Samsung, that would be the better Manufacturer (comparing brand to brand). Now the actual tv themselves could be completly different, but Samsung is a better brand. Without model numbers, there is no telling which TV is better.
thatS2Kguy
12-21-2006, 02:22 AM
Why not get a 32" LCD tv for around $500-600? Slimmer than those tvs your looking at and they are HDtv to boot. It makes more sense.
Demsum
12-21-2006, 02:38 AM
I sell tv's for a living so I know The Sony XBR tube set is heavy as hell, But all HD tube sets are. The Samsung is a little less heavy and takes up less space though. As far as LG goes, they are only cool for people that want a cool looking tv and not a good picture. I say they are entry level because the price is right and they look good to the average person, but to us that look at high def tv's all day long they don't compare to Sony or Samsung.
Why not get a 32" LCD tv for around $500-600? Slimmer than those tvs your looking at and they are HDtv to boot. It makes more sense.
You cant find a "good" quality 32" LCD for $500-$600. In fact you probably wont find a good quality 32" LCD for under $1,000.
koukis14
12-23-2006, 02:12 AM
I just got the exact Samsung you are talking about and I am having a repair man come after the first of the year to fix it...after two weeks. I could have taken it back but it weighs 145 pounds.
krisjun2002
12-23-2006, 03:47 PM
I got the 32" wide screen samsung, bought it from best buy, and i dont know if its the way it was designed or what, but the magnets to the speakers on the side will turn the colors on my tv, so i have to get that wand thing and wipe over the screen with it. The first one i had did the same, so i took it back and they swapped it out, but i wasnt taking this one back again, that bitch is stout.
Also it has HDTV 1080i logo on it, so does that mean it can display 1080i?
DemonEyez
12-24-2006, 04:41 PM
btw i forgot to mention you can get the sony kd34xbr970 for around that price. Its a 34" hdtv tube tv and simply the best tube tv out there by far. In consumer repots the no.2 tv is 18 points behind it.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.2 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.