View Full Version : The definition of Porsche
81911SC
11-01-2007, 10:43 PM
exactly , so common folk wouldnt even know either
So?
...so whats the point in paying 213k if you cant ball out
.......
Benefit
11-01-2007, 11:07 PM
i mean dont take me as ignorant ,im very open minded....but 213k i would expect to get laid every hour of the day.
Benefit
11-01-2007, 11:09 PM
the generalization of porsches as luxury mr2's was a joke!...
11-01-2007 02:51 PM 81911 That is the dumbest **** I have ever heard
lmao
IDCoconut
11-01-2007, 11:13 PM
some of you just don't know......just stick with your own damn brand of cars.
VooDooXII
11-01-2007, 11:18 PM
That car is 100x better than any car that has ever been on IA. Or pretty much anywhere. It's like the QD of the automotive world. BUT, there is one other car that I would personally call the true definition of Porsche:
Later, QD.
There's a guy with a spotless black Porsche 356 at Tech. It's BEAUTIFUL. There's another guy with a mid-60's or 70's Mercedes...also beautiful. I think it's a turbo-diesel...because you can't kill a Mercedes diesel engine.
fawk_you
11-01-2007, 11:19 PM
AMAZING!!
VooDooXII
11-01-2007, 11:20 PM
Oh yea, and this car is amazing. I wonder why it has a sunroof though... :thinking:
Hundo®
11-02-2007, 12:04 AM
AMAZINGLY UGLY!!
:yes:
Thighs
11-02-2007, 12:16 AM
What you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this thread is now dumber for having read it. I award you neg reps, and may God have mercy on your soul.
actually, he said body kits suck.
pretty true.
fawk_you
11-02-2007, 12:24 AM
:yes:
HEY!! lol
Hundo®
11-02-2007, 12:28 AM
actually, he said body kits suck.
pretty true.
:no:
antiv6
11-02-2007, 12:29 AM
i don't understand why people like the older Porsche's that look like this, ive always hated them style wise, it looks like an retarded Volkswagen beetle, and 95 percent of you would yell rice if you saw that spoiler on anything besides this
Hundo®
11-02-2007, 12:34 AM
HEY!! lol
owned. :D
Hundo®
11-02-2007, 12:34 AM
i don't understand why people like the older Porsche's that look like this, ive always hated them style wise, it looks like an retarded Volkswagen beetle, and 95 percent of you would yell rice if you saw that spoiler on anything besides this
:lmfao::yes:
fawk_you
11-02-2007, 12:36 AM
owned. :D
sheesh!! haha
Hundo®
11-02-2007, 12:43 AM
sheesh!! haha
:upchuck:
TS240
11-02-2007, 12:45 AM
WOW, I feel bad for the guy that put out over $200,000 for that. I really like the new Porsche's but the old ones were just ugly. :2cents:
ATK_Designs
11-02-2007, 12:51 AM
That car is a good classic?
Yes
Do I like that car?
Yes
That car looks good!
No, not for time.
Would I pay that much for that car?
Definitely Not
Do I like Porsche?
Yes
Which Porsche do I like?
New models: Cayman S, C.GT, 993.
Do I think it's "The Definition of Porsche?"
No, there are many other models that can represent Porsche better.
Just my opinions. ;)
Hundo®
11-02-2007, 12:53 AM
That car is a good classic?
Yes
Do I like that car?
Yes
That car looks good!
No, not for time.
Would I pay that much for that car?
Definitely Not
Do I like Porsche?
Yes
Which Porsche do I like?
New models: Cayman S, C.GT, 993.
Do I think it's "The Definition of Porsche?"
No, there are many other models that can represent Porsche better.
Just my opinions. ;)
you am make good point big boyA!
whens the next Z/G meet?
81911SC
11-02-2007, 01:30 AM
911s are the most thought of model when MOST people think of Porsche. This is my definition.
John, how dense are you? I go and make fun of your interwebz typing to your face in "The RL" followed by, not ten minutes later mind you, a permanent record of my ridicule placed carefully on the World Wide Web and you have the gall to feign ignorance as to my true identity.
Your vanity is overwhelming.
I'm having trouble making sense of this brain vomit. Now, I'm not even a super huge fan of 911s, and I have a very strong inherent bias toward lighter weight MR autos, but I'm not fool enough to believe that there exists anything reasonably attainable that comes within an arms length of a ****ing Carrera RS in any criteria that matters. It's a ****ing Carrera RS. One more time, It's a Carrera RS.
damn huggies is a smart man! i wish i could +5 him..
ATK_Designs
11-02-2007, 01:34 AM
911s are the most thought of model when MOST people think of Porsche. This is my definition.
oh no, don't get me wrong, I love the 911s. My opinion was just about that specific model/year that you posted. ;)
But then again, each to his own. It's just my opinions and nothing more :yes:
Kris - New info will be posted once confirmed.
Reading is easy (and fundemental). I said I had trouble making sense of your incredibly fat and hairy statements. Perhaps, when you painted your rims by hand in an unventilated garage you lost a few million too many brain cells. Perhaps, those brain cells were responsable for knowing the difference between a 350Zucks and a Carrera RS.
Perhaps, while driving Fast and Furious(TM) down by the rail tracks against some Honda Civics with your non-functional fire extinguisher velcroed to your dash and your speed sapping bolt-on "Aerodynamic Enhancements" applied by your certified auto mechanic half-cousin Wallace you knocked all the god damned sense out ya head and onto the well worn pavement.
Perhaps, real men don't care how fast they are going or how ugly they look. Perhaps, real men are content with a subtle tool that allows those of skill to carve a fine and delicate slice of cheesecake out of the road of life.
Keep your blunt force trauma induction device of a rice burner, with the hand painted rims.
i love this guy!!!
im going to post this on 6speedonline.com
they are going to have a blast!! hahah they would make so much fun of these rice boys..
http://www.6speedonline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=95722&highlight=dirty
go through the first 10 pages.. its a treat!! and yes, this guy owns all twelve cars..
81911SC
11-02-2007, 01:49 AM
oh no, don't get me wrong, I love the 911s. My opinion was just about that specific model/year that you posted. ;)
But then again, each to his own. It's just my opinions and nothing more :yes:
Kris - New info will be posted once confirmed.
Whats yours? Pics welcome:D
SicStang03
11-02-2007, 04:12 AM
i don't understand why people like the older Porsche's that look like this, ive always hated them style wise, it looks like an retarded Volkswagen beetle, and 95 percent of you would yell rice if you saw that spoiler on anything besides this
True but.. Would you not yell rice at anything that has lambo doors besides a lambo:thinking:...:D
It's ok though at least we agree that 03/04 cobras are the best car ever:yes:
And body kits do suck kris:tongue1:
True but.. Would you not yell rice at anything that has lambo doors besides a lambo:thinking:...:D
It's ok though at least we agree that 03/04 cobras are the best car ever:yes:
And body kits do suck kris:tongue1:
wow justin.. this must be one of the smartest things i have ever heard you say.. +5 if i can..
quickdodge®
11-02-2007, 07:17 AM
i don't understand why people like the older Porsche's that look like this, ive always hated them style wise, it looks like an retarded Volkswagen beetle, and 95 percent of you would yell rice if you saw that spoiler on anything besides this
I guess you do have room to speak on ugly cars. That is if your sig pic represents what you like in a car. Later, QD.
EJ25RUN
11-02-2007, 09:17 AM
i wouldnt say its ugly but 213k...
ok so i guess your issue is paying 213k ....... "thinks"......
so you would understand paying $14,000,000 for this either?
http://www.bobmastersphotography.com/jpegs/cars/bugattiroyal.jpg
IDCoconut
11-02-2007, 09:20 AM
huggies is the man.
It's a Carrera RS. That should have ended the thread 14pages ago.
speedminded
11-02-2007, 09:44 AM
exactly , so common folk wouldnt even know either...so whats the point in paying 213k if you cant ball outNow YOU are exactly like those doctors, lawyers, and celebrities you mentioned yesterday that "only buy ferraris and lamborghini's to show them off". Unlike you, some people are knowledgeable about vehicles and purchase one because the way it feels and sounds or in the case of the Carrera RS, a collectable that will only continue to increase in value.
speedminded
11-02-2007, 09:53 AM
Oh yea, and this car is amazing. I wonder why it has a sunroof though... :thinking:Any option that was available by Porsche could be put on when you ordered it, some Carrera RS's even had electric windows...
i don't understand why people like the older Porsche's that look like this, ive always hated them style wise, it looks like an retarded Volkswagen beetle, and 95 percent of you would yell rice if you saw that spoiler on anything besides thisWhat Porsche's have you driven?
You're right, a Porsche whale tail on anything but a Porsche is ridiculous, as is Lamborghini doors on anything but a Lamborghini. See the trend?
quickdodge®
11-02-2007, 10:08 AM
You're right, a Porsche whale tail on anything but a Porsche is ridiculous, as is Lamborghini doors on anything but a Lamborghini. See the trend?
Exactly. Functionality does not beget rice. Later, QD.
IndianStig
11-02-2007, 10:35 AM
Sick little car right there.
Huggies
11-02-2007, 12:15 PM
the original car posted is really ugly
You all do realise that while driving an automobile, in most cases, you will be on the inside of the machine. Thus, having only a tantalising view of the hood and front wheel arches (real men don't look in the mirrors). With this information taken into consideration what then does this highly subjective criterion of exterior beauty really matter?
:upchuck:
It's the god damned homologated son of a car that got 2nd overall at Le Mans. Saying you wouldn't take this car over a 350z is roughly akin to saying you wouldn't take a McLaren F1 over a model year 2025 Nissan Z because you thought the McLaren was "ugly". Roflcopter.
Excuse me while I vomit inside my mouth.
Hundo®
11-02-2007, 12:57 PM
You all do realise that while driving an automobile, in most cases, you will be on the inside of the machine. Thus, having only a tantalising view of the hood and front wheel arches (real men don't look in the mirrors). With this information taken into consideration what then does this highly subjective criterion of exterior beauty really matter?
It's the god damned homologated son of a car that got 2nd overall at Le Mans. Saying you wouldn't take this car over a 350z is roughly akin to saying you wouldn't take a McLaren F1 over a model year 2025 Nissan Z because you thought the McLaren was "ugly". Roflcopter.
Excuse me while I vomit inside my mouth.
you can make any car fast/good at handling.
you can't make a car.. NOT ugly. unless you spend tons of money on body conversions. and in porsches case you wuoldn't want to alter it because the shape is that way for a reason. just not my style, it's disgusting. for 213,000$ id make 10 cars that will destroy that ugly frog of a thing on the highway the track and wherever else, and look good doing it.
EJ25RUN
11-02-2007, 01:07 PM
You all do realise that while driving an automobile, in most cases, you will be on the inside of the machine. Thus, having only a tantalising view of the hood and front wheel arches (real men don't look in the mirrors). With this information taken into consideration what then does this highly subjective criterion of exterior beauty really matter?
It's the god damned homologated son of a car that got 2nd overall at Le Mans. Saying you wouldn't take this car over a 350z is roughly akin to saying you wouldn't take a McLaren F1 over a model year 2025 Nissan Z because you thought the McLaren was "ugly". Roflcopter.Excuse me while I vomit inside my mouth.
1973 Daytona 24 Hour...... Peter Gregg & Hurley Haywood drove a Carrera RS to to the overall victory in the event. THIS WAS THE FIRST TIME EVER A GT CAR FROM THE LOWEST CLASS WAS ABLE TO TAKE OUTRIGHT VICTORY IN THE EVENT AGAINST COMPETION FROM EVEN THE PROTOTYPES like Mirage, Lola, and Matra!!!
I'd really like to see a 350z do that today!
speedminded
11-02-2007, 01:11 PM
you can make any car fast/good at handling.
you can't make a car.. NOT ugly. unless you spend tons of money on body conversions. and in porsches case you wuoldn't want to alter it because the shape is that way for a reason. just not my style, it's disgusting. for 213,000$ id make 10 cars that will destroy that ugly frog of a thing on the highway the track and wherever else, and look good doing it.For $20,000 i could build a car that would completely destroy the Carrera RS but that not the point. YOU build a car and the value is going to be no more than what you have in it...if even half. The Carrera RS was $12,000 NEW in 1973 & 1974 with the value of the ones sold recently have been $180,00-200,000+. It's a collectors item, period.
Huggies
11-02-2007, 01:35 PM
you can make any car fast/good at handling.
you can't make a car.. NOT ugly. unless you spend tons of money on body conversions. and in porsches case you wuoldn't want to alter it because the shape is that way for a reason. just not my style, it's disgusting. for 213,000$ id make 10 cars that will destroy that ugly frog of a thing on the highway the track and wherever else, and look good doing it.
Exactly. Any car with enough money and engineering is capable of eXtreme preformance. In the end a purchased car is a sled to slap your roll cage and Skyline engine onto.
So why buy anything but a 800kg mid-engined two door which you can then rice to your hearts content into a champion racer? Hehe.
Now, taking a step out of the pits, let's imagine that you are not looking for a Race Car but rather a Sports Car. As a Sports Car the Carrera RS is nigh untouchable. Imagine that our hypothetical driver and owner of a stock Carrera RS and a stock 350Z won't modify his cars in the least. Now what's up, playa.
I think I've discovered your problem. You sleep in Nomex pyjamas don't you? Perhaps you might want to, on occasion, remember that racing is but a subset of what cars are used for, son.
Hundo®
11-02-2007, 01:49 PM
For $20,000 i could build a car that would completely destroy the Carrera RS but that not the point. YOU build a car and the value is going to be no more than what you have in it...if even half. The Carrera RS was $12,000 NEW in 1973 & 1974 with the value of the ones sold recently have been $180,00-200,000+. It's a collectors item, period.
i said look good doing it. i wouldn't want one cuz it's ugly, your 20,000 car would be ugly too.
Hundo®
11-02-2007, 01:50 PM
Exactly. Any car with enough money and engineering is capable of eXtreme preformance. In the end a purchased car is a sled to slap your roll cage and Skyline engine onto.
So why buy anything but a 800kg mid-engined two door which you can then rice to your hearts content into a champion racer? Hehe.
Now, taking a step out of the pits, let's imagine that you are not looking for a Race Car but rather a Sports Car. As a Sports Car the Carrera RS is nigh untouchable. Imagine that our hypothetical driver and owner of a stock Carrera RS and a stock 350Z won't modify his cars in the least. Now what's up, playa.
I think I've discovered your problem. You sleep in Nomex pyjamas don't you? Perhaps you might want to, on occasion, remember that racing is but a subset of what cars are used for, son.
keep your RS garbage, ill go get an F430/gallardo and beat you. back in the day, when ther was nothing else better, im sure i would have bought and RS too for 12,000$, then again, i might have liked the way it looked back in 1847 when it came out.
but as far as current time.. that car just doesn't compare to other super cars for the price.
hell ill go get a gt2 - gt3 CURRENT and pay 100,000$ less, or the Skyline GT-R, new or the old one.
i actually like the newer porsches, they're based off the same "LINES" yes but they look pretty much nothing the same IMO.
speedminded
11-02-2007, 02:00 PM
i said look good doing it. i wouldn't want one cuz it's ugly, your 20,000 car would be ugly too.If you call a Radical ugly, sure. You can get Formula Mazdas for $20k all day long too ;) But do you mean build one from scratch or what? I could build a Honda that would run circles around that car (or any other non-turbo 911 up through the 90's) for under $20k.
speedminded
11-02-2007, 02:02 PM
keep your RS garbage, ill go get an F430/gallardo and beat you. back in the day, when ther was nothing else better, im sure i would have bought and RS too for 12,000$, then again, i might have liked the way it looked back in 1847 when it came out.
but as far as current time.. that car just doesn't compare to other super cars for the price.
hell ill go get a gt2 - gt3 CURRENT and pay 100,000$ less, or the Skyline GT-R, new or the old one.
i actually like the newer porsches, they're based off the same "LINES" yes but they look pretty much nothing the same IMO.Why the fuck do you insist on comparing a 1973/74 Carrera RS to the high performance cars of today? Get your head out of your ass.
You want to compare it to a Ferrari, then find me one that cost $12,000 new in the early 70's. Then find me one that has increased in value over 2000%.
81911SC
11-02-2007, 02:03 PM
but as far as current time.. that car just doesn't compare to other super cars for the price.
That's not the point of it. Nobody said it could keep up with/ beat any of those. It's not always about the speed, son.
Huggies
11-02-2007, 02:15 PM
keep your RS garbage, ill go get an F430/gallardo and beat you. back in the day, when ther was nothing else better, im sure i would have bought and RS too for 12,000$, then again, i might have liked the way it looked back in 1847 when it came out.
but as far as current time.. that car just doesn't compare to other super cars for the price.
hell ill go get a gt2 - gt3 CURRENT and pay 100,000$ less, or the Skyline GT-R, new or the old one.
i actually like the newer porsches, they're based off the same "LINES" yes but they look pretty much nothing the same IMO.
I'm pretty sure we can stop doing price:performance ratios once we crack one hundred large, nerd. You are talking about high roller items with a small fry mind. High rollers stop caring how performant things are, and only care how sweet/awesome/rad things are.
I guess your just doomed to some kind of special hell for the people who like the look of the 350z (which by all accounts is the visual offspring of a Ford Focus, a 3rd gen Eclipse, and a DUN DUN DUN 911).
speedminded
11-02-2007, 02:21 PM
oh yeah, figured it out! $1.00 in 2006 was equivalent to $0.19 cents in 1970...soo $0.19 in 1970 would buy you $1.00 worth of goods today.
Therefore a $12,000 car in 1970 is equivalent to a $63,157.89 today, which amazingly about the exact cost of a regular Porsche Carrera...BUT since the value of the dollar dropped 50% from 1970-1980 I can't determine what the EXACT value in 1973 was.
Hundo®
11-02-2007, 02:32 PM
so in thi s thread we've accomplished:
nothing.
i dont like the car.
/argument.
speedminded
11-02-2007, 02:58 PM
oh yeah, figured it out! $1.00 in 2006 was equivalent to $0.19 cents in 1970...soo $0.19 in 1970 would buy you $1.00 worth of goods today.
Therefore a $12,000 car in 1970 is equivalent to a $63,157.89 today, which amazingly about the exact cost of a regular Porsche Carrera...BUT since the value of the dollar dropped 50% from 1970-1980 I can't determine what the EXACT value in 1973 was.Ah, I got it...lol! The value of the dollar dropped 53% from 1970-1980 which is 5.3% p/year. If we said it dropped steadily each year then in 1973 about $0.26 = $1.00 today (technically 0.2567 = 1.00).
That means a $12,000 car (Carrera RS) in 1973 is equivalent to a $46,740.86 car today.
If a $12,000 car from 1973 is valued at $200,000 today that's a 1,666.6% increase in value.
CLIFF NOTES: Find me a $47,000 car today that will be worth over $783,000 in 34 years. ;)
Hundo®
11-02-2007, 03:23 PM
ok, so to clear things up.
for it's time, im sure the RS was a pretty badass car. But it's still ugly.
And if you're saying that currently you would take that car over any other car that you could get today, you're nuts, and frankly a ****ing fanboy.
unless you're balling out of control and you can afford anything you want, and you want that just so you can say "i have that ugly ass car with a whale tail that beat all the other ones back in 1692."
Huggies
11-02-2007, 03:33 PM
ok, so to clear things up.
for it's time, im sure the RS was a pretty badass car. But it's still ugly.
And if you're saying that currently you would take that car over any other car that you could get today, you're nuts, and frankly a ****ing fanboy.
unless you're balling out of control and you can afford anything you want, and you want that just so you can say "i have that ugly ass car with a whale tail that beat all the other ones back in 1692."
I would take quite a few current cars over the Carrera RS. All of them share this trait with the RS though, they are under 1000kg. None of these obese fat cars that can't stay off the candy. I mean the modern GT3 RS is 1.3k, which is like, one million pounds overweight. Your precious 350z is 1.4k, which means it needs a motorised cart to get around the supermarket.
I just want to know why almost all the hot sub-1000kg cars are british... or thirty years old.
On_Her_Face
11-02-2007, 03:43 PM
id take it over my car.. mainly for the money though.. not to own a peice of porsche heritage.
Hundo®
11-02-2007, 03:46 PM
id take it over my car.. mainly for the money though.. not to own a peice of porsche heritage.
duh, id take it in a heartbeat and resell it. we're saying, if you had to keep it, this or.. anything else.
benny.boom
11-02-2007, 03:53 PM
where did you get these pics?
speedminded
11-02-2007, 04:00 PM
ok, so to clear things up.
for it's time, im sure the RS was a pretty badass car. But it's still ugly.
And if you're saying that currently you would take that car over any other car that you could get today, you're nuts, and frankly a ****ing fanboy.
unless you're balling out of control and you can afford anything you want, and you want that just so you can say "i have that ugly ass car with a whale tail that beat all the other ones back in 1692."You just don't get it, the only reason the Carrera RS was built was to be qualified to participate in a certain race class, the FIA Group 4. Building a minimum of 500 production street cars enabled them to enter into that class. This is the game/politics that car manufacturers deal with every single day.
Then not only that but the race version Carrera RSR would mark the beginning to Porsche's turbocharging, where do you think that got us today? (GM was doing it 10 years before on production vehicles but soon abandoned it and BMW began turbocharging production cars in 1973)
Hundo®
11-02-2007, 04:04 PM
You just don't get it, the only reason the Carrera RS was built was to be qualified to participate in a certain race class, the FIA Group 4. Building a minimum of 500 production street cars enabled them to enter into that class. This is the game/politics that car manufacturers deal with every single day.
Then not only that but the race version Carrera RSR would mark the beginning to Porsche's turbocharging, where do you think that got us today? (GM was doing it 10 years before on production vehicles but soon abandoned it and BMW began turbocharging production cars in 1973)
you've provided me with no new information and i still hate how it looks. Furthermore allt his useless information you guys keep telling me about what a great car it is, still doesn't change the fact in my mind that it's ugly. and that wast he only thing i was saying.
speedminded
11-02-2007, 04:21 PM
you've provided me with no new information and i still hate how it looks. Furthermore allt his useless information you guys keep telling me about what a great car it is, still doesn't change the fact in my mind that it's ugly. and that wast he only thing i was saying.9/10 Z32 owner despised the Z33 when the concept was released and i still do. It's a grand touring car and as far as GT's go the G35 looks a million times better. Please explain the golf ball dimples on the door handles and certain model wheels? Its over-exaggerated features are ridiculous looking BUT I can overlook 99.9% of the appearance if it makes up for it handling and performance wise....which it doesn't
...and that brings me to this, it's 400lbs heavier than a BMW M3 with 50 less hp & 10lbs-ft. torque. The engine specs don't matter much, speed and quickness is in the gearing and weight ratio anyways...but 400 lbs IS a big deal. Of course the Z33 is $20,000 less but we won't get into that :tongue:
Hundo®
11-02-2007, 05:07 PM
9/10 Z32 owner despised the Z33 when the concept was released and i still do. It's a grand touring car and as far as GT's go the G35 looks a million times better. Please explain the golf ball dimples on the door handles and certain model wheels? Its over-exaggerated features are ridiculous looking BUT I can overlook 99.9% of the appearance if it makes up for it handling and performance wise....which it doesn't
...and that brings me to this, it's 400lbs heavier than a BMW M3 with 50 less hp & 10lbs-ft. torque. The engine specs don't matter much, speed and quickness is in the gearing and weight ratio anyways...but 400 lbs IS a big deal. Of course the Z33 is $20,000 less but we won't get into that :tongue:
you've obviously never driven a Z33. around the track i've seen countless drivers beat out boxter S's AND your beloved M3. the 2007 Z's are a whole different story, beating the M3 in the 1/4 mile and around the track, at the same price as the other ones. The features you find ridiculous some seem to like, it's a difference of opinions, i think that porsche is ugly, some people think it looks good.
my 350z weighed in at the track at 3400 lbs.. which ironically is the exact same as the M3.. which you claim is lighter. the 350z also has a better final drive and comes equipped with brembo brakes. and for 38k in 2007 you can buy a Nismo 350z which will annihilate an M3 around the track.. for 20,000 LESS. there's really no comparing these cars. the m3 is overpriced. period.
at the crank ON PAPER your M3 comes with 50 more horse power.. but it frankly doesn't show.
I've raced a stock 2006 M3 SMG on the highway and took it by a Car length., given i had intake/exhaust ( an extra 10-15whp most) at the time that could have been the determining factor. Regaurdless, for the price, you can't beat the 350z in looks/speed/handling, stock for stock brand new for anything at $40,000 and under. ( and even higher in some cases )
speedminded
11-02-2007, 05:40 PM
you've obviously never driven a Z33. around the track i've seen countless drivers beat out boxter S's AND your beloved M3. the 2007 Z's are a whole different story, beating the M3 in the 1/4 mile and around the track, at the same price as the other ones. The features you find ridiculous some seem to like, it's a difference of opinions, i think that porsche is ugly, some people think it looks good.
my 350z weighed in at the track at 3400 lbs.. which ironically is the exact same as the M3.. which you claim is lighter. the 350z also has a better final drive and comes equipped with brembo brakes. and for 38k in 2007 you can buy a Nismo 350z which will annihilate an M3 around the track.. for 20,000 LESS. there's really no comparing these cars. the m3 is overpriced. period.
at the crank ON PAPER your M3 comes with 50 more horse power.. but it frankly doesn't show.
I've raced a stock 2006 M3 SMG on the highway and took it by a Car length., given i had intake/exhaust ( an extra 10-15whp most) at the time that could have been the determining factor. Regaurdless, for the price, you can't beat the 350z in looks/speed/handling, stock for stock brand new for anything at $40,000 and under. ( and even higher in some cases )You said it right there, DRIVERS.
Don't even say my m3, I didn't say I had anything to do with them, it's just the first "sportscar" I thought of to compare it to with similiar power and weight (ohhh, I looked up M3 specs and mistakingly ended up with the E46 M3 CSL, which is 3,052lbs) so my initial guess was right...it is the same weight as the bimmer but with a lil less power which I already said didn't matter all that much anyways.
For under $40k AND a daily driver the Z isn't a bad deal at all, never said it wasn't...I've both ridden and driven several but I personally don't think it's a "play" car or even makes a "fun" track car. It is however a relatively comfortable daily coupe.
BKgen®
11-02-2007, 05:43 PM
God i hate M3's.
Hundo®
11-02-2007, 05:47 PM
You said it right there, DRIVERS.
Don't even say my m3, I didn't say I had anything to do with them, it's just the first "sportscar" I thought of to compare it to with similiar power and weight (ohhh, I looked up M3 specs and mistakingly ended up with the E46 M3 CSL, which is 3,052lbs) so my initial guess was right...it is the same weight as the bimmer but with a lil less power which I already said didn't matter all that much anyways.
For under $40k AND a daily driver the Z isn't a bad deal at all, never said it wasn't...I've both ridden and driven several but I personally don't think it's a "play" car or even makes a "fun" track car. It is however a relatively comfortable daily coupe.
well, difference of opinion :]
i drove m3/s2k/rx8/boxster/350z before i bought my Z.. i was going to buy one of the 5. i ended up with the Z IMO it feels/looks the best. however the M3 is right up there with looks with the Z imho. M3's are ****ing clean :]
where did you get these pics?
from Wantone off S2ki.com
heres the link to the rest of the pics that wantone took.
http://www.s2ki.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=538989
DUBSf22c
11-03-2007, 08:17 AM
Regaurdless, for the price, you can't beat the 350z in looks (opionionionoino) /speed/handling :thinking::thinking::crazy:, stock for stock brand new for anything at $40,000 and under. ( and even higher in some cases ) =fixed
KRIS YOUR STUPID!
UMM YES STI / EVOX (35,000 range) will make your 350ZOMG to shame!.. thankyou come again
DUBSf22c
11-03-2007, 08:20 AM
dumb ass
Hundo®
11-03-2007, 12:32 PM
=fixed
KRIS YOUR STUPID!
UMM YES STI / EVOX (35,000 range) will make your 350ZOMG to shame!.. thankyou come again
the 07 z will beat STI's. the EVO9 is a faster car however, but, i dont know how well the new Nismo Z would do against the EVO9, could be a more fair match.
DUBSf22c
11-03-2007, 02:08 PM
the 07 z will beat STI's. the EVO9 is a faster car however, but, i dont know how well the new Nismo Z would do against the EVO9, could be a more fair match.
your a fanboi... dont forget the cobra.. the new sti will take out the 350z
kris.. ive lost so much respect for you.. and your digging yourself deeper and deeper into this hole of ignorance and stupidity.. anyone with taste in cars will know that car is not ugly.. it might not tickle your fancy like it does to some of us, but there is nothing possibly ugly about the car.. please feel free to point out what is ugly..
what the round headlights? please enlighten us and justify your opinion or GTFO!
Name it, anything, and this will be the end of this argument..
& stop comparing it to new cars.. of course i would rather drive a F430.. The point is this car is not ugly.. who cares about the price tag.. this is not what the argument is about..
SicStang03
11-03-2007, 02:53 PM
LOL at this ****...
Kris, this car may not be your cup of tea but how can you honestly say the stock z looks better?? I am so lost...
Also there are many cars that own a z in the price range
VooDooXII
11-03-2007, 02:57 PM
I think F430's are ugly though.
i have that ugly ass car with a whale tail that beat all the other ones back in 1692."
that whale tail is smaller than your wing.. and its alot more practical than your Nismo kit..
ANSWER POST #317
just as a side note.. this is ugly:
http://www.webwombat.com.au/motoring/images/nissan-350z-380rs-2-big.jpg
work just liek a pickup truck.. you can sit 8 mexicans back there..
SicStang03
11-03-2007, 03:19 PM
^ OMG is that the 07 nismo Z that he has been praising??
That thing is hidious :lmfao:
he's been praising about that? we have found the problem..
AtLRSX-S
11-03-2007, 09:32 PM
kris is right, that cars ****ing ugly.
and the 07 Z's will destroy an STI. even the 03-06 z's stock for stock beat it around the track and the 1/4 mile. STI's are garbage stock.
chituntang
11-03-2007, 09:43 PM
It is not hard to find a car that is better than another, but not all cars are classics.
http://www.6speedonline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=95722&highlight=dirty
go through the first 10 pages.. its a treat!! and yes, this guy owns all twelve cars..
good god, thats one helluva collection..too bad none of them belong the the OP.
kris is right, that cars ****ing ugly.
and the 07 Z's will destroy an STI. even the 03-06 z's stock for stock beat it around the track and the 1/4 mile. STI's are garbage stock.
um.. no..
87 Turbo II
11-03-2007, 10:45 PM
^ OMG is that the 07 nismo Z that he has been praising??
That thing is hidious :lmfao:
no, you guys don't understand, this one comes with an integrated square shelf comming out of the round curvy flow. God you guys don't know anyhting. He can keep his tacky bobble heads up there. You guys are just jealous because your car doesn't say NISMO and cost $2000 for shelf-like body panels. '07 350Z pwns all.
AtLRSX-S
11-03-2007, 10:49 PM
no, you guys don't understand, this one comes with an integrated square shelf comming out of the round curvy flow. God you guys don't know anyhting. He can keep his tacky bobble heads up there. You guys are just jealous because your car doesn't say NISMO and cost $2000 for shelf-like body panels. '07 350Z pwns all.
you couldn't afford a car that was made before 1987. why are you talking? jealousy is not becoming of you. fag.
81911SC
11-03-2007, 11:05 PM
Go back and put your nose in the corner, I might give you a cookie if your good. You can leave this thread now.^^^
VooDooXII
11-03-2007, 11:21 PM
I wouldn't drop $213,000 on it.
cobalt9123
11-03-2007, 11:23 PM
kris is right, that cars ****ing ugly.
and the 07 Z's will destroy an STI. even the 03-06 z's stock for stock beat it around the track and the 1/4 mile. STI's are garbage stock.
That's a big no on that one buddy. Less HP, Less Tq, no awd, no win. The new STI's have ran 13.1's completely stock, i've seen a Z do a 13.4 at best with a 6 speed completely stock. I've also seen a Twin turbo Z not be able to pull better than a 14 flat, that kid CAN NOT drive.
87 Turbo II
11-04-2007, 01:13 AM
you couldn't afford a car that was made before 1987. why are you talking? jealousy is not becoming of you. fag.
lol @ you taking things too seriously. I love my car, so no jealousy here. Lots of people own older cars here, do they not deserve to voice an opinion either? Also, made before 1987, don't you mean after. You should've stayed in school, then you can at least have substance behind you being an a$$hole.
DUBSf22c
11-04-2007, 06:25 AM
I think F430's are ugly though.
hahah voodoo allways makes me at least giggle with his simple posts:goodjob:!
edit:
You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to VooDooXII again.
DUBSf22c
11-04-2007, 06:38 AM
oh and kris----
DOESNT THIS MEAN IT MAKES MORE EARLY.. AND HAS AWD....
AND HAS 4 DOORS AND A HATCH!! BUHAHAHAH ON YOUR 350ZOMG
08 STI +(AWD)
• US-spec models 305 hp @6000 rpm / 290 lb-ft @ 4000 rpm
AND JUST TO HUMOR YOU 07STI
Horsepower @ rpm.
293 @ 6000
Torque (lb-ft) @ rpm.
290 @ 440
(07 EPA)
6-speed manual --/-- --/-- 19/25
07 350Z YOU FANBOI NUT ON ALL OVER
Horsepower @ rpm. 306 @ 6800
Torque (lb-ft) @ rpm. 268 @ 4800
EPA City / highway mpg
6-speed manual 20/27
5-speed automatic 19/26
DUBSf22c
11-04-2007, 06:39 AM
kris is right, that cars ****ing ugly.
and the 07 Z's will destroy an STI. even the 03-06 z's stock for stock beat it around the track and the 1/4 mile. STI's are garbage stock:thinking:.
wtf is you talking about :screwy:
note...... you drive an rsx....
and whats your rsx stock?
-----note. i had an rsx........
no, you guys don't understand, this one comes with an integrated square shelf comming out of the round curvy flow. God you guys don't know anyhting. He can keep his tacky bobble heads up there. You guys are just jealous because your car doesn't say NISMO and cost $2000 for shelf-like body panels. '07 350Z pwns all.
:goodjob: reps
DUBSf22c
11-04-2007, 06:44 AM
you couldn't afford a car that was made before 1987. why are you talking? jealousy is not becoming of you. fag.
i sense some real hostility
Go back and put your nose in the corner, I might give you a cookie if your good. You can leave this thread now.^^^
hahhaha +reps
edit
You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to 81911 again.
lol @ you taking things too seriously. I love my car, so no jealousy here. Lots of people own older cars here, do they not deserve to voice an opinion either? Also, made before 1987, don't you mean after. You should've stayed in school, then you can at least have substance behind you being an a$$hole.
oh hahahahahha :doh:
allmotoronly
11-04-2007, 11:11 AM
damn this is STILL going on???
DUBSf22c
11-04-2007, 11:38 AM
damn this is STILL going on???
MOST OF US ARE FREINDS sooooooooo we can get our point across together here about how stupid kris looks right now... !@ hahaha :lmfao::lmfao:
On_Her_Face
11-04-2007, 01:27 PM
the new sti are ulgy as sin. (08 that is)
DUBSf22c
11-04-2007, 01:30 PM
the new sti are ulgy as sin. (08 that is)
i thought they were but after seeing mroe and more and more.. they are hawt...
On_Her_Face
11-04-2007, 02:30 PM
i thought they were but after seeing mroe and more and more.. they are hawt...
how.. i keep looking at them and this is all i see: The 2008 Sti
AtLRSX-S
11-04-2007, 04:20 PM
wtf is you talking about :screwy:
note...... you drive an rsx....
and whats your rsx stock?
-----note. i had an rsx........
:goodjob: reps
are you stupid john? you wrecked your RSX.
my RSX is 300whp. ill burn your STI.
AtLRSX-S
11-04-2007, 04:21 PM
how.. i keep looking at them and this is all i see: The 2008 Sti
naw, ford focus sold their old design plans to Subaru, so now it's even uglier.
On_Her_Face
11-04-2007, 04:59 PM
the sti is ruined. 04 sti for lyfe yo!!!11
SicStang03
11-04-2007, 07:02 PM
OK I'm gunna make this quick......
1. The new STIs and 350Zs are both ugly as fawk
2. Sean, take yo ass back to Korea ho
3. I think it agreeable that nobody on this forum would pay 213K for that car but It's not ugly
4. IMPORTS SUCK...
/thread
_Christian_
11-04-2007, 07:06 PM
that RS is gorgeous, you damn tasteless ricers!
Hundo®
11-04-2007, 07:50 PM
UGLYYYY
i wouldn't drive it unless i could sell it/light it on fire afterwards.
SicStang03
11-04-2007, 08:06 PM
UGLYYYY
i wouldn't drive it unless i could sell it/light it on fire afterwards.
OK Kris,
What do you think is ugly about it?? I want a list...
Benefit
11-04-2007, 08:09 PM
well i would say that it looks like its missing its rear bumper
Hundo®
11-04-2007, 08:22 PM
OK Kris,
What do you think is ugly about it?? I want a list...
whats to list?? the ENTIRE ****ING THING IS UGLY, IT'S NOT A GOOD LOOKING CAR AT ALL.
it looks 100% like a frog.
there is not one thing i like about it, NOTHING. it's just IMO disgusting.
but it doesnt matter, JUST MY OPINION.
you guys need to calm down. lol.
Hundo®
11-04-2007, 08:23 PM
oh and kris----
DOESNT THIS MEAN IT MAKES MORE EARLY.. AND HAS AWD....
AND HAS 4 DOORS AND A HATCH!! BUHAHAHAH ON YOUR 350ZOMG
08 STI +(AWD)
• US-spec models 305 hp @6000 rpm / 290 lb-ft @ 4000 rpm
AND JUST TO HUMOR YOU 07STI
Horsepower @ rpm.
293 @ 6000
Torque (lb-ft) @ rpm.
290 @ 440
(07 EPA)
6-speed manual --/-- --/-- 19/25
07 350Z YOU FANBOI NUT ON ALL OVER
Horsepower @ rpm. 306 @ 6800
Torque (lb-ft) @ rpm. 268 @ 4800
EPA City / highway mpg
6-speed manual 20/27
5-speed automatic 19/26
how bout this.
you run constant 13.5+ in your MODDED STI.
stock 07's are pulling easy 13.4's.
my 04 ran a 13.8 stock.. which means on the highway w/o your all wheel drive launch you still wouldn't stand a chance. lol.
and you call me a fanboy? that's funny.
seeing as you were mr. id take my RSX type S over antyhing :lmfao:.
i mearly state facts. you were always spewing some bull**** about how you raped 350z's on the highway, then i got one... and... wait...
anyways.
im hardly a fan boy, facts are facts, if im proven wrong then ill shut up.
SicStang03
11-04-2007, 09:15 PM
how bout this.
you run constant 13.5+ in your MODDED STI.
stock 07's are pulling easy 13.4's.
my 04 ran a 13.8 stock.. which means on the highway w/o your all wheel drive launch you still wouldn't stand a chance. lol.
and you call me a fanboy? that's funny.
seeing as you were mr. id take my RSX type S over antyhing :lmfao:.
i mearly state facts. you were always spewing some bull**** about how you raped 350z's on the highway, then i got one... and... wait...
anyways.
im hardly a fan boy, facts are facts, if im proven wrong then ill shut up.
Duh, he had a boost leak:D
Also what track was this 13.8 in??
My car sucks at the track:rolleyes:
Aslo still waiting on a list of **** that makes the RS ugly
87 Turbo II
11-04-2007, 09:25 PM
how.. i keep looking at them and this is all i see: The 2008 Sti
that's a Mazda Protege5.... not an STi
87 Turbo II
11-04-2007, 09:31 PM
4. IMPORTS SUCK...
do NOT start that debate in here, or clarify that that is your opinion because I am one of the people saying domestics are fast..... in a straight line that is. Your Cobra may have rear wheel independant suspension, but in a ghetto jerry rigged way. As well as bad distribution of weight. Now, I'll give you that you can kick plenty of import ass in a straight line. Now you can go home smiling about that, I'll be happy with my handling, we both have our own strengths, our own weakenesses, and we come out even. Now please, kill this domestic import thing.
Benefit
11-04-2007, 10:03 PM
do NOT start that debate in here, or clarify that that is your opinion because I am one of the people saying domestics are fast..... in a straight line that is. Your Cobra may have rear wheel independant suspension, but in a ghetto jerry rigged way. As well as bad distribution of weight. Now, I'll give you that you can kick plenty of import ass in a straight line. Now you can go home smiling about that, I'll be happy with my handling, we both have our own strengths, our own weakenesses, and we come out even. Now please, kill this domestic import thing.
:yes:
DUBSf22c
11-05-2007, 12:03 AM
the sti is ruined. 04 sti for lyfe yo!!!11
yeh but i rather have the 05 sti interior and 5x114.3
VooDooXII
11-05-2007, 12:06 AM
that's a Mazda Protege5.... not an STi
He's calling out the similarity between the body styles.
DUBSf22c
11-05-2007, 12:11 AM
how bout this.
you run constant 13.5+ in your MODDED STI.
.
with everyone well knowing i cant even hit full STOCK boost.. im not getting over 11-12 psi.. and actually 13.4 at 97 and 1.81 60ft is my best when hitting 12psi.. (if im not mistaking?)... fanboi..
You have just proved only that your a true fanboi. thats all your doing...
I will be getting that all fix tuned and some changes@! :D before I get into the new apartment.. and when i run .. and dont fully show-off/up.. then you can run your mouth... until then give it up
We first started this for you being just retarded for thinking it was ugly then your dumb ass comment after comment making you sound stupider every time you type.. :no:.
87 Turbo II
11-05-2007, 12:11 AM
oh, I re-read it, I'm sorry, I misunderstood
The Yousef
11-05-2007, 12:12 AM
this is a definition of a porsche:
http://www.channel4.com/4car/media/100-greatest/03-large/112-vw-beetle.jpg
DUBSf22c
11-05-2007, 12:12 AM
are you stupid john? you wrecked your RSX.
my RSX is 300whp. ill burn your STI.
yes you said a sti is worthless stock and soo i said what is an rsx stock?? TRASH?
DUBSf22c
11-05-2007, 12:15 AM
do NOT start that debate in here, or clarify that that is your opinion because I am one of the people saying domestics are fast..... in a straight line that is. Your Cobra may have rear wheel independant suspension, but in a ghetto jerry rigged way. As well as bad distribution of weight. Now, I'll give you that you can kick plenty of import ass in a straight line. Now you can go home smiling about that, I'll be happy with my handling, we both have our own strengths, our own weakenesses, and we come out even. Now please, kill this domestic import thing.
dont worry im sitting next to him now.. he is just tired of kris (kayfunk) being ****ing retarded
Hundo®
11-05-2007, 12:19 AM
yes you said a sti is worthless stock and soo i said what is an rsx stock?? TRASH?
lol, i never thought i'd see the day.
if you still had your RSX you wuold be defending it as best car int he world to the death. Lololol
do NOT start that debate in here, or clarify that that is your opinion because I am one of the people saying domestics are fast..... in a straight line that is. Your Cobra may have rear wheel independant suspension, but in a ghetto jerry rigged way. As well as bad distribution of weight. Now, I'll give you that you can kick plenty of import ass in a straight line. Now you can go home smiling about that, I'll be happy with my handling, we both have our own strengths, our own weakenesses, and we come out even. Now please, kill this domestic import thing.
this kid is retarded.. it handles better than 350z's.. typical rice boy..
i dont like domestics.. im a import guy.. but cobra's handle damn good..
DUBSf22c
11-05-2007, 01:31 AM
lol, i never thought i'd see the day.
if you still had your RSX you wuold be defending it as best car int he world to the death. Lololol
way out of that ****,, fanboi.. thats your new name by the way
DUBSf22c
11-05-2007, 01:37 AM
lol, i never thought i'd see the day.
if you still had your RSX you wuold be defending it as best car int he world to the death. Lololol
oh and fanboi i will run you now.. with 12psi issue.. and when im retuned prolly this month or next i will mow down your 350ZOMG...
but im jealous of your 350Zomg bbqsauce lollerskates... i wish i didnt have an aftermarket suspension and painted wheels and no turbo.
maybe I could ps a lip on my car like yours. you know we all know your PS skills give that **** away??!?! FANBOI
FAKE?!?!?!
here's a few more pictures of that riced out 350
http://i29.photobucket.com/albums/c277/KRISGROVES/edited350shotsmf-0132.jpg
http://i29.photobucket.com/albums/c277/KRISGROVES/edited350shotsm.jpg
NOT FAKE
http://i11.photobucket.com/albums/a184/Dubs03RSX/attachment-1.jpg
http://i11.photobucket.com/albums/a184/Dubs03RSX/ewf.jpg
meh, would look 10x better without a painted lip at all... :)
SicStang03
11-05-2007, 01:59 AM
do NOT start that debate in here, or clarify that that is your opinion because I am one of the people saying domestics are fast..... in a straight line that is. Your Cobra may have rear wheel independant suspension, but in a ghetto jerry rigged way. As well as bad distribution of weight. Now, I'll give you that you can kick plenty of import ass in a straight line. Now you can go home smiling about that, I'll be happy with my handling, we both have our own strengths, our own weakenesses, and we come out even. Now please, kill this domestic import thing.
OK,
I was just kdding because honestley I could care less to argue with a bunch of rice boys about import vs. domestic... I do realize every car has its advatages but that was a joke to my FRIENDS in this thread. But seriously 350s are ugly and the NEW STIs just as ugly.
THAT RS LOOKS NICE THOUGH
SicStang03
11-05-2007, 02:00 AM
meh, would look 10x better without a painted lip at all... :)
Or if he got real wheels:goodjob:
81911SC
11-05-2007, 02:04 AM
I am dying loling
_Christian_
11-05-2007, 02:14 AM
look i can has a jdm red lip too!
DUBSf22c
11-05-2007, 02:26 AM
look i can has a jdm red lip too!
JDM FTW LOLLERKATES BBQSAUCE
81911SC
11-05-2007, 02:45 AM
LOLOLOLOLOL
seriously.. OH SNAP!!!!
http://www.importatlanta.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=120916&stc=1
lol +5..
SicStang03
11-05-2007, 11:44 AM
OMG... I has a body kits toos
http://i167.photobucket.com/albums/u141/bradsjl/Random/krisLOL.jpg
quickdodge®
11-05-2007, 11:54 AM
But seriously 350s are ugly and the NEW STIs just as ugly.
We disagree on a few things. This is NOT one of them. Later,QD.
SicStang03
11-05-2007, 12:55 PM
We disagree on a few things. This is NOT one of them. Later,QD.
Touche;)
Hundo®
11-05-2007, 01:57 PM
oh and fanboi i will run you now.. with 12psi issue.. and when im retuned prolly this month or next i will mow down your 350ZOMG...
but im jealous of your 350Zomg bbqsauce lollerskates... i wish i didnt have an aftermarket suspension and painted wheels and no turbo.
maybe I could ps a lip on my car like yours. you know we all know your PS skills give that **** away??!?! FANBOI
FAKE?!?!?!
NOT FAKE
http://i11.photobucket.com/albums/a184/Dubs03RSX/attachment-1.jpg
http://i11.photobucket.com/albums/a184/Dubs03RSX/ewf.jpg
that was before bucky redid them . :goodjob:
lsi-crvtec
11-05-2007, 04:01 PM
nice man nice
81911SC
11-05-2007, 04:02 PM
**** you ******, die.^^^
SicStang03
11-05-2007, 10:58 PM
Don't let this thread die!!!!
Kris you suck at life...
John, Kris is talkin smack about ya gurl...
DUBSf22c
11-05-2007, 11:00 PM
Don't let this thread die!!!!
Kris you suck at life...
John, Kris is talkin smack about ya gurl...
oh man **** dat *****.. HE CAN LICK SOME BAWLS
81911SC
11-05-2007, 11:07 PM
A few more for Kristine:
VooDooXII
11-05-2007, 11:08 PM
Green is gross...I like the red and white SO much better.
81911SC
11-05-2007, 11:10 PM
A bit of "Fresh" air in here.
Hundo®
11-05-2007, 11:13 PM
A bit of "Fresh" air in here.
minus the blue.. that's pretty ****ing sweet.
Hundo®
11-05-2007, 11:14 PM
A few more for Kristine:
that makes me want to ralph all over myself.
VooDooXII
11-05-2007, 11:14 PM
Hmm...blue, not bad. I don't like 996's though...
81911SC
11-05-2007, 11:15 PM
Doubt y'all noticed but thats a GT2 stripped out and caged.
VooDooXII
11-05-2007, 11:16 PM
I see it...GT2's have that "mini grille"...
81911SC
11-05-2007, 11:37 PM
The vent before the hood?
VooDooXII
11-05-2007, 11:40 PM
Oh that's actually a vent?
Okay...the mustache. GT2s have a mustache.
Hmm...blue, not bad. I don't like 996's though...
saabs suck monkey ****.. lol
81911SC
11-06-2007, 12:04 AM
GT3's have them too, Voodoo. I made a rhyme.
VooDooXII
11-06-2007, 12:12 AM
saabs suck monkey ****.. lol
:lmao: No offence!
I like Porsches all in all...but the 993 will always be my favorite body-style.
GT3's have them too, Voodoo. I made a rhyme.
http://www.jolle.se/imgs/cookie.jpg
:lmao: No offence!
I like Porsches all in all...but the 993 will always be my favorite body-style.
lol.. i also love 993s..
81911SC
11-06-2007, 12:23 AM
Voodoo, *****
VooDooXII
11-06-2007, 12:25 AM
You love me.
Hundo®
11-06-2007, 12:26 AM
http://i29.photobucket.com/albums/c277/KRISGROVES/carepolice.gif
Lolol
Gene's ugly.
VooDooXII
11-06-2007, 12:43 AM
About as much as kayfunk loves that picture.
DrivenMind
11-06-2007, 04:55 AM
i bet it looked sweet in 1910.. but i've seen honda cars with better styling.
Your Z takes hints from that cars styling.
Come on man, you gotta pay respect where it's due. The RS is a legend.
My friends dad has one in his basement.
speedminded
11-06-2007, 07:17 AM
Green is gross...I like the red and white SO much better.That green is gross now (unless you mention Tein or Takata :tongue: ) but half the population back then had an entire house of appliances that color...it was 'in' during the 70's.
sakasaku
11-06-2007, 08:26 AM
saweet
VooDooXII
11-06-2007, 03:25 PM
That green is gross now (unless you mention Tein or Takata :tongue: ) but half the population back then had an entire house of appliances that color...it was 'in' during the 70's.
Hahaha, oh I know...people were :screwy:
DUBSf22c
11-06-2007, 03:43 PM
Doubt y'all noticed but thats a GT2 stripped out and caged.
rs's come with cages stock dont they?
81911SC
11-06-2007, 03:45 PM
The new RS's do in Europe. Lol
DUBSf22c
11-06-2007, 03:47 PM
The new RS's do in Europe. Lol
wtf why not us... same with the stradale (sp) ferrari
81911SC
11-06-2007, 03:58 PM
And they get a lexan rear window among a few other things.
speedminded
11-06-2007, 04:11 PM
The new RS's do in Europe. LolPorsche will build a cage in any car if you order it....ever see Cleve's old GT2? Brushed finish with the rear shock reservoirs attached to it. Bet there's not too many cages on here made by TUV certified welders ;)
81911SC
11-06-2007, 07:18 PM
Well if we are talking the Exclusive, they will do almost anything you want. I meant stock.
DUBSf22c
11-06-2007, 07:48 PM
wow give me now
DUBSf22c
11-06-2007, 07:49 PM
Lolol
http://smiliesftw.com/x/life.gif
nissans in that era looked so much better..
take for example, the definition of Nissan, a skyline:
http://www2.nissan.co.jp/SKYLINE/HISTORY/IMAGES/4th_top_img.jpg
http://www.nissanforum.com/models/skyline/images/1972-Nissan-Skyline.jpg
i can point out what looks bad.. though, the car is not just straight up "ugly".. isn't "gross".. and doesn't make me "puke"..
Hundo®
11-07-2007, 11:56 AM
nissans in that era looked so much better..
take for example, the definition of Nissan, a skyline:
http://www2.nissan.co.jp/SKYLINE/HISTORY/IMAGES/4th_top_img.jpg
http://www.nissanforum.com/models/skyline/images/1972-Nissan-Skyline.jpg
i can point out what looks bad.. though, the car is not just straight up "ugly".. isn't "gross".. and doesn't make me "puke"..
the first one doesnt look bad, but the 2nd one is hideous, it's gross, probably jsut because it LOOKS old.
speedminded
11-07-2007, 12:49 PM
the first one doesnt look bad, but the 2nd one is hideous, it's gross, probably jsut because it LOOKS old.It's the same car dumbass :slap:
^^ im sorry, but the lines just dont do it for me.. and the wheels..
IDCoconut
11-07-2007, 12:54 PM
Yea. I'd take that skyline over the frog.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.....HA
speedminded
11-07-2007, 01:00 PM
^^ im sorry, but the lines just dont do it for me.. and the wheels..Check out the 4 door!
http://www.nissanforum.com/models/skyline/images/1973-Nissan-Skyline.jpg
BUT on the other hand the Datsun 240z was a work of art...
http://www.tizcc.ca/images/current1.jpg
http://www.tizcc.ca/images/current2.jpg
Check out the 4 door!
http://www.nissanforum.com/models/skyline/images/1973-Nissan-Skyline.jpg
BUT on the other hand the Datsun 240z was a work of art...
http://www.tizcc.ca/images/current1.jpg
http://www.tizcc.ca/images/current2.jpg
ya i know, i was going to post pics of the 4 door, but i wanted to compare a coupe for coupe and a legend for legend.. but the 4 door is so ugly.. and i love the z.. not more than the RS though..
IronEagle
11-13-2007, 03:44 PM
I run one of the race prepped RSRs in GT Legends sim (http://gtlegends.com/). Alot of fun to toss around. The ducktail version like in the original post is lighter with a bit less horsepower than the later whale tail wide body that has wider rear tires in the sim. Amazing machines that will reward you with fast laps and great thrils but will throw you into the weeds in an instant if you don't respect it.
Anyway those are great pics but for 200k a new 997 Turbo would be my ride of choice.
IronEagle
11-13-2007, 03:52 PM
http://i119.photobucket.com/albums/o124/Turbossr/1-2.jpg
http://i119.photobucket.com/albums/o124/Turbossr/3.jpg
http://i119.photobucket.com/albums/o124/Turbossr/11.jpg
http://i119.photobucket.com/albums/o124/Turbossr/4.jpg
speedminded
11-13-2007, 03:58 PM
I run one of the race prepped RSRs in GT Legends sim (http://gtlegends.com/). Alot of fun to toss around. The ducktail version like in the original post is lighter with a bit less horsepower than the later whale tail wide body that has wider rear tires in the sim. Amazing machines that will reward you with fast laps and great thrils but will throw you into the weeds in an instant if you don't respect it.
Anyway those are great pics but for 200k a new 997 Turbo would be my ride of choice.That's a 930...big difference between a 911 Carrera RS and a 930 RSR :tongue:
81911SC
11-13-2007, 04:02 PM
LOL huge difference.
IronEagle
11-13-2007, 04:25 PM
Yeah I love the 930/934. Turbo FTW.
You all should get this sim. They are bundle it at Fry's and you get GTR2 and GT Legends for 20 bucks.
Evil Goat
11-13-2007, 04:37 PM
cars under plastic = condensation = rust
unless its a climate controlled building
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.2 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.