Where did I say the C5 gets more looks than the GTR?
The GTR does get more looks than a Zo6 any day.
Nothing wrong with wanting a Boxster, but over a GTR? Again, LOL.
Where did I say the C5 gets more looks than the GTR?
The GTR does get more looks than a Zo6 any day.
Nothing wrong with wanting a Boxster, but over a GTR? Again, LOL.
R35 GTR: Best r/t .000, Best 60' 1.69, Best ET 10.92, Best mph 129.9
Ok, you're clearly having a hard time to comphrehend. I'm saying the GTR WILL get more looks, no shit. Esp. if you are talking about your C5. The reasons I underlined are the reasons I would take it over the GTR. And yes, I would take it over the heavy, fake manual front engine Nissan GTROriginally Posted by GSRcaucAZN78
So why is it that the boxster you love so much is out performed by a HEAVY, FAKE MANUAL, FRONT ENGINE, NISSAN GT-R...
You said it, not me. Apparently you have a hard time comprehending...
Now I know you're stupid, (as it's evident in your posts) so I'll try to explain. I like the Boxster because it's all about the drive. Not the times, to me anyway. Heavy is not fun, I like to shift, and I prefer the engine behind me. If I wrote it in crayon and sent you a letter, would that help you understand?So why is it that the boxster you love so much is out performed by a HEAVY, FAKE MANUAL, FRONT ENGINE, NISSAN GT-R...
You said it, not me. Apparently you have a hard time comprehending...
I don't understand why some people are so passionate on hating the GTR. Claiming to want a Boxster over a GTR is the first I've heard though, lol.
You mean... "heavy" yet corners faster, "fake manual" that shifts more consistant/faster than any human ever could, "front engine" yet perfectly balanced (52/48).
It's not just an 11 second car, but CONSISTENT MID 11 second car that does 0 to 60 mph in 3.3 seconds. My 11.34 second pass actually = a 2.88 second 0 to 60 mph time.
R35 GTR: Best r/t .000, Best 60' 1.69, Best ET 10.92, Best mph 129.9
Where do you see pasion in my posts? I mean heavy, because it is.I'm glad you can shift fast in that car, however to ME, (as I stated previously
You have no business arguing in this thread. You shouldn't even be in a thread regarding the GTR. I don't know of anybody that has debated on getting a 911 variant vs. another car. It's either you want it or you don't, if you are interested in a Porsche then most likely there is NO other option. Porsche enthusiasts are completely 100% in a league of their own.Where do you see pasion in my posts? I mean heavy, because it is.
I'd love for Cleve to chime in, he's owned a 650hp GT2 and SEVERAL GT-R's, and heard he was or is building a built 930 and looking at getting a ZR-1 as well. I'd love to hear his opinion.
Where are you going to drive it when a few hundred lbs. is going to matter? Unless you're on a road course where 1/10ths matter then DRIVING is DRIVING, the handling and power doesn't matter. I can have fun in a shopping cart going 20mph across a parking lot, big deal lol!
My Z32 300zx was heavy and my Type-R powered GS-R with Porsche brakes was more nimble, quicker, and stopped better....but what do you think was more enjoyable to drive? Overall I'd take the Z, just needed 100+ more hp! I gave PLENTY of Porsche's and other 300-400+hp cars runs for their money on mountain runs, both in the Z32 and DC2.
For the price of a new GTR (good luck getting one for $75k) you can get a slightly used 996 GT2 with 7k miles.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Porsc...fCarsQ5fTrucks
Personally if I were to spend $75-100k on a Porsche it would be a 964 or 993 with a 996 TT swap....built.
Regarding the transmission, I hate not having a typical H or dogleg gearbox BUT if you drove a high end competitive track/race car built to todays standards what do you think it would have in it? A sequential gear box.
Last edited by speedminded; 03-03-2009 at 02:29 PM.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
