yeh starting at 38,150.. PRETTY MUCH 40 OVER...Quote:
Originally Posted by SicStang03
BUT THIS SOO CALLED ****US IS HAWT
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2222/...9c56db.jpg?v=0
Printable View
yeh starting at 38,150.. PRETTY MUCH 40 OVER...Quote:
Originally Posted by SicStang03
BUT THIS SOO CALLED ****US IS HAWT
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2222/...9c56db.jpg?v=0
Yeah no doubt but I think I would take a new Evo over the new WRX.Quote:
Originally Posted by dubs04sti
Quote:
Originally Posted by BUGMAN
x2
love stis
^what a waste of a post.
the sti just ownd that mustang
i dont want ur fukin reps. pm'd :2up:Quote:
Originally Posted by dubs04sti
wow grow up? :screwy:How old are ya now bro? replied! :goodjob:Quote:
Originally Posted by TRYMY4.0
I guess when ur an idiot putting ":goodjob:" is funny? lol. just as pathetic as transaxle when replying to kayfunk. :lmfao:Quote:
Originally Posted by dubs04sti
You guys obviously know these comparissons are bull because they said the viper would kill the c6 z06 vette in every category and look it up in any vid put C6 Z06 vs. Viper SRT-10 and the vette always woops the vipers azz...so I dont belive crap what they say because I dont see the viper dominating the le mans since they should because these articles say that it handles better....:blah:
You have to take into consideration that the people driving these cars, are professionals. So the results are usually 100% true. In the street, it all comes down to the driver. This video actually is true, the STi would walk circles around a GT all day.Quote:
Originally Posted by NosVette
hahaha do some research jackassQuote:
Originally Posted by NosVette
Team Oreca DOMINATED the LeMans until The GM team BěTCHED about the vipers being TOO FAST for the. The Viper was running the factory producted 8.0L while the Vette was running...what again? Not what came in it from the factory. The viper was heavier and less aerodynamic.
Now, any Viper team that attends LeMans is private owned and they dont have the funds like team GM.
Viper > belly button vette
:umno:I think some one else is the one who should do your research again because maybe back then the vette didnt use the stock 346 ci motor but as of today it uses the same 427 ci that the z06 comeswith.If you dont know dont speak with all due respect that was all bull what you just said because teams cannot complain about other cars being too fast what do you think this is pinks or sumthing they have rules on what the cars hp should be at,wheight, and track times to make it all fair.So even though one car is a tad bit quicker it doesnt matter because the difference isnt crap its all up too the driver and the handling of the vehicle.:rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by TRYMY4.0
well either these guys dont like vettes or they dont know what they are doing because they also said the gt 500 is a c6 z06 killer and as many of you guys have seen the stock z06 walks circles around the gt 500 so as for the viper and gt 500 in all the street racing vidz not tracks because its all up to the driver but as for rolls were the driver really doesnt count the z06 killz them both look it up and youll see what im talking about...Quote:
Originally Posted by Maniac©
so..your saying Dodge DIDNT have to add weight and put huge restrictor plates on their car? lol. I know the facts mr belly button.
\Quote:
Originally Posted by NosVette
I like anything that stops me from walking...
I know for a fact that the new Shelby's ain't gonna take a vette. I have seen a brand new vette with the air box cut out run several very low 12's before dipping in and pulling out a 11.94 and he is no where near being a professional driver. Now the Gt 500's that I have seen at the track didn't have professional driver either but I have yet to see a stock one come anywhere close to a 11 second pass.
Hell the stock Gt's like in that video are in the 13's so anyone with any care to go fast don't have a STI or GT anyway. Who the hell cares about slow cars that cost 25k (Mustang) or 40k (STI) anyway? Yeah that Mustang may cost 35k but only because of the additional plastic. You can get one with the same exact engine for 25k that weighs less.
This is a pathetic comparison and obviously it was paid for by the vehicle vendors that were praised just like all the rest of them.
blowjobs from an ugly chick but hey its still a blow job right?Quote:
Originally Posted by DeweyWRX
stupid comparison. i dont think anyone would be choosing between these two.
did you read the comments from the video those guys are retards. lolQuote:
Originally Posted by SicStang03
no you need to do some research about racing. the teams do complain to the stewards who change the rules to make it competitive because when one team dominates the other teams leave and who wants to watch 1 team race against no one. so the fans leave. no fans no money. so maybe you should check some facts.Quote:
Originally Posted by NosVette
OK I AM GUNNA END THIS RIGHT NOW!!!
My car sold new under 40K and is almost 5 years old now and will still sell for mid 20's.. How about we compare the 03/04 Cobra to the STI?? Of course an STI is going to **** on a fat ass GT...
In the end the 03 cobra is the KING and can't be beat for the price!!!
~except for Z06s and Vipers (which I will have soon)~
Did you read the post I made thats what I said they have rules on how your car performs overall the others to make it all fair...Quote:
Originally Posted by Leadfoot_mf
I just sexed myself looking at your sig... I am looking at getting those wheels in black w/ a polished lip for my car soon
yea...thats not his car...look in the avatar...why would he have a different car and thename in the white vette's bumper...nothing adds up...should i lock this worthless thread?...Quote:
Originally Posted by SicStang03
no...dont lock it...its to interesting to watch people argue about how a fakeass mustang was compared to a sti and then say how subaru owned shelby.Quote:
Originally Posted by TRYMY4.0
if an actual shelby was compared to a sti.....it'd be a lot different. the stang probably would have had a lot more on the sti and possibly dominated.
btw....reppedfor knowing the facts.
^ aight u gotta point. I'm just tired if BIASED people. I think the REAL Shelby Cobra would have done a lot better againist the STi. Would It have dominated? maybe. I dunno because there is no test. its still a STUPID comparison. an 4cyl AWD grocery getter vs solid axle 2wd 500hp dump truck of a car.
next it's going to be the: Smart car vs the Arial Atom.
lol. i think its funny cause some thing has a sticker people automatically assume thats what the car is.Quote:
Originally Posted by TRYMY4.0
line up a REAL shelby against the sti....and lets see what happens.
exactly. Ive seen BMW's with the M decal...doesnt mean it actually is an M-series. lol. just a stupid comparison. thats prob why they picked that car b/c it said "Shelby" on it and they knew they could beat it.
:2cents:Quote:
Originally Posted by Chink5
All I know is the new STI's look like ass...
ok, thats enough. lol. :locked:x
For anyone who cares for cliffs:
-Sti beats "Shelby"
-Shelby=plain ol GT
-stupid comparison