For you fitment freaks..sneak peak!
![]()
For you fitment freaks..sneak peak!
![]()
DAMN, that's pretty clean! Think it would look better if the tires weren't so stretched to fit! IMO
damn thisisnice
(((((No more 4 door))))))
this is bad makes me wanna get one.
]
sick stance
About to approach beast mode
What looks good on a proper luxury car kind of looks ridiculous here. Keep it clean and when you get a proper RWD big body luxury car, go with the "stance" look. I mean its a Civic.
Vossen CV3 20x9 & 20x10.5
picture one makes it look like it should be in the cartoon "cars"
looks sick man, but would look better with a front lip
that tire stretch is ugly
it looks good, just nothing special IMO, another set of me too wheels.
HF
That's a SICK Si!!! Love it love it. Great pics
Work in progressneed slicks!
i like![]()
too much poke...but it still looks nice
The Answer to 1984 is 1776
-Alex Jones
no
CD5 Accord
personally love it
nice but, i gotta wonder how many times this car has gotten stuck on something.
breathtaking..but would not want to drive it .
on the pics and the subject is dead sexy
BUILT NOT BOUGHT .........
car/wheels won't hold together very long like that in Nola
lol it kinda looked like a g35 lol, but its clean ....
HELLLA GAY!
Hella stock member!
looks amazing, these guys would kill somebody if they saw the white with the same wheels...i think its a Texas car.
sexy
garbage. way too much stretch...i mean theres space between the lip of the wheel and the tire. Im usually all for some low offset and stretched tires....but i prefer to see this specific car with my eyes closed.
I dont like it,it would be alright if it was more flush.
Stock with wheels & coilovers .. but if it can take fast corners w/out ripping up the fender/tire then props.
Looks like crap to me!i wont do all of that to fit wheels on my FWD car.
92 mx3
i think it looks stupid in general.. but what really makes it look dumb to me is how much more negative camber there seems to be in the back than the front.