would you?
would you?
DRIVE IT TILL YOU BREAK IT!!!
as stupid as the Cayenne.
thats a tough one for $110k friend has one and its skeet skeet skeet... lol
I wouldn't but I wouldn't buy a Cayenne Turbo S either. For those in the market for those kind of vehicles now have a good looking alternative with similar performance.
Ryan Reynolds
"So long and thanks for all the fish"
555hp sounds good to me for a suv!!!!!!!
DRIVE IT TILL YOU BREAK IT!!!
I like the 5-series GT better, but that isn't saying much either.
i think the only reason i like it is cause it looks like a 335! on steroids!!!!
DRIVE IT TILL YOU BREAK IT!!!
FUCK NO. I would never spend over 10k on any BMW unless it was a purpose built race car.
It actually looks great. But for the money, I could think of several other options.
G37s 6MT/coupe
i sure would
whats better then the x6 M thats a suv? i know i you could get a car but i want a fast suv.
DRIVE IT TILL YOU BREAK IT!!!
i wonder why they used flash in the first picture to light the grill, front bumper and front tire tread but didnt use it in the other pictures![]()
sorry but the srt8 jeep is slow against the x6 M!!!
DRIVE IT TILL YOU BREAK IT!!!
hell no has nobody seen the new top gear? its the worst car ever. lol
SRT-8 Jeep
Power: 425/420
0-60: 4.7
60-0: 125 Feet
1/4: 13.4@102
.84G Skidpad
BMW X6M
Power: 555/500
0-60: 4.5
60-0: 107 Feet
.91G Skidpad
The performance is very comparable but at what cost?
btw... its $86,000 not $110,000
Id rather have the srt-8 jeep
I'd rather have a base Porsche SUV then a BMW M SUV any day.
Either the Cayenne Turbo S or the ML63. I, personally, wouldn't pay $60k for the X6 unless I could mod it and / or resale it. It's Not the most attractive SUV out there.![]()
Your sig gave me a seizure.
- IA Management
www.facebook.com/wes.monteith
"I don't know the key to success, but the key to failure is trying to please everybody." -Bill Cosby
"I'll fuck you 'til you love me, faggot!" -Mike Tyson
.....I'd buy an audi r8 with that much $$$
NO I would not, mainly because it looks like ass. Sorry BMW failed on that cars design as hard as Porsche did with a Panamera..
However, I would do....
X5 M
ML63
Range Rover Supercharged (none-sport, 510hp version)
Sorry, if you want a fast S.U.V I wouldn't do a Porsche because they have to much offroading bullshit preventing it from being able to dance like the BMW's. They are soft and heavy for their size. At least the Range Rover can properly offroad, go fast, brake fast and not turn. The Cayenne is a bad combination, plus they break constantly (worked in a Porsche shop).
They BMW is a realistic approach because it lacks lots of heavy offroading equipment, which is why its simplier a sportier S.U.V then the Porsche.
The trailblazer SS and SRT-8 Jeep are great bang for the buck, but when you pay rental car like prices you get rental car like technology and quality. No double clutch 7 speed, rev matching, launch control gear box in the Jeep, and it traps 10mph slower in the 1/4 and I won't event alk road course. Modded it is comparable straight line (of course), but the new X5 M is seriously fast everywhere stock (wait until software comes out). The trailblazer was outdated when it came out, with it's 4-speed auto and pre-bankrupt GM interior but oh, it does love the 1/4 mile once modded!!
Here's a X6 M wallowing around Road Atlanta, supposedly touched 145 range on the back straight.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qLW8SYN1IyA
if it was given to me ... then hellS YeaH
If I had a family and money out the ass I would. It would make a perfect family car.
You niggas know my pyroclastic flow, its R A W!
- Current: E36
This car really has no purpose. I'd either take a high performance sedan as a family car, or buy a car that is actually meant for the offroads because the X6 isn't really good for either.