Yes, all animated.
Looks nice... very nice.
http://media.movies.ign.com/media/04...70/vids_1.html
Yes, all animated.
Looks nice... very nice.
http://media.movies.ign.com/media/04...70/vids_1.html
i dunno man, it looks pretty cool to me. Not something you see every day... final fantasy did it, but they didn't model real actors' faces in cgi. i think it'll be bitchin'.Originally Posted by Whiteboy™
I Have To Read That Story For Fucking Class LOL!
that's one of the only ones i really ever enjoyed reading. Reminded me of Morrowind:Bloodmoon when i was reading it lolol.Originally Posted by ep9716
haha, me too! I got Bloodmoon right after I finished reading the book!Originally Posted by KDM guy
As for making it full CGI based off of peoples' faces...what's the point?
Correct Fitment Crew CEO2012 Hyundai Veloster / 1960 Fiat 600D
Because Only Turds Should be Dumped and Flushed.
I guess because it's just differen - kinda like 300 was different in the stylistic way it was made. Seems like it would be kind of a waste of time, but i'm pretty stoked to see it...Originally Posted by XanRules
Angelina? Hell yeah! Sign me up!
Fuck stance. Stance is for kids in skinny jeans with Justin Beiber haircuts. You don't need stance when you got swagger.
x2Originally Posted by xPhantomSolx
"I remember the first time I had sex – I kept the receipt."
it's not completely a CGI movie... it's all live action with CGI "enhancements".
...ninja
close enough, smart ass.![]()
how is it close enough? CGI and Live action are different... it's basically the same style as 300, except they are going a little further with the CGI part. Beowulf is basically using the same technology as the Polar Express movie.Originally Posted by KDM guy
...ninja
check this one out:
http://www.beowulfmovie.com/restricted/verify.php
damn grendel looks like one badass mofo
too bad that other book I had to read for class made him an existentialist pussmaster.Originally Posted by KDM guy
Correct Fitment Crew CEO2012 Hyundai Veloster / 1960 Fiat 600D
Because Only Turds Should be Dumped and Flushed.
Grendel by john gardner? lolol i had to read that shit, tooOriginally Posted by XanRules
![]()
One of the only two books I've ever actually ripped up and thrown away in class.Originally Posted by KDM guy
Incidentally the other one was about existentialism, too.
Oh, and 300's stylization kicked ass and didn't have CGI characters. It just seems like a waste of money and talent. But I'll still see the movie.
Correct Fitment Crew CEO2012 Hyundai Veloster / 1960 Fiat 600D
Because Only Turds Should be Dumped and Flushed.
300 was practically completely filmed in front of a Green screen... how can you say it wasn't CGI?Originally Posted by XanRules
...ninja
word on the streets is you get to see angelina naked. but i dont know how sexy 80 pounds will look like naked....
I wonder how people would react to that...being that Angelina's animated.Originally Posted by I ♥ My S13
again... not animated. do I have to post up the interview for the movie?Originally Posted by VooDooXII
...ninja
no... calm down, Tonto. we believe you.Originally Posted by ubers2k
Ummm... I am calm? I just don't like it when people talk about a movie when they don't know anything about it...Originally Posted by KDM guy
...ninja
same ways as normalOriginally Posted by VooDooXII
thumbs down
looks good. i remember this story when i was in drama thru high school... damn i feel old now..lols
You know better; next time will be a ban.
300 had tons of CGI
taken from IMDb:
"According to the writers Gaiman and Avary, the reasons of making the movie entirely CG are:
- the aging of the main character (covering 50 years of his life);
- the creative freedom which the process gives, keeping the cost the same per minute, no matter of the content;
- the movie is designed to be seen in 3D (IMAX or Real D)."
Last edited by BKgen®; 08-26-2007 at 06:06 PM.
Originally Posted by KDM guy
Everything is "motion captured" but it's still going along the basis that The Polar Express took, which was all live action with "CG enhanced imagery". During a Comic-con interview after the movie was unvieled, the director stated that it was not a CGI movie, but a movie with CGI enhancements. If I can find that clip I'll post up.
Notice I say "enhancements" though. That pretty much means that most of it will be live action, but as you said, it gives the freedom of manipulating age and time. So most of the movie will be live action (same as 300) but when they need to they can manipulate the characters the way they need to to fit the story. It's still considered a live action film, same as every other movie using the same technology.
...ninja
All i'm saying is you can really tell from the trailer that the way they use CG in the movie is a far cry from what most people are used to seeing.Originally Posted by ubers2k
Very true. I doubt we'll see another movie like this one using this technology any time soon. It is a good example of what movies and directors might use later on. I'm still going to see it. The movie looks bad ass.Originally Posted by KDM guy
...ninja
x2Originally Posted by ubers2k
![]()
Originally Posted by ubers2k
Semantics...you knew what I meant.
I know...Originally Posted by VooDooXII
![]()
![]()
...ninja
TTT
I can't wait to see it on friday.
Originally Posted by KDM guy
x2 But I think I might see it on Saturday. Depends on my buddies. Lol
most people are only gunna go see this movie because the new "1-18-08" movie trailer will be shown prior to the movie.
GECKO SQUAD
i saw it, not all its cracked up to be. Very boring at parts.
X2........seen it lastnite, nice effects and it definitely raised the bar for CGI in movies, it seemed to get boring and be a little too long.Originally Posted by magneto198
NO ADVERTISING
-IA MANAGEMENT
i enjoyed it, but it left the story too open for a movie that won't make enough for a sequel...i mean in the book doesn't his friend kill "angelina" at the end? nothing happened there..
PSN SN= dartingd