my guess is that he unstoppable force would blow right through the object, because while it's unmovable, it's not indestructible.
If an unstoppable force comes across an unmovable object, then what happens?
my guess is that he unstoppable force would blow right through the object, because while it's unmovable, it's not indestructible.
what is the point of this question since there's no such thing?
But my guess would be the "unstoppable force" would stop when it make connect with the "unmovable force", and the "unmoveable force" would move due to the transfer of energy.
Makes sense...
sponsored by: workhard motorsports. // tuned by
Is the unmovable object porous or solid?
Leisa and S. 4 Life NM?
an unstoppable force doesn't mean it's indestructible... right?Originally Posted by thecrazyone
Is the Unstoppable force a Trapezoid?
Leisa and S. 4 Life NM?
Its impossible to have both, one cancels the other out.
If a force is unstoppable then there is no such thing as an unmovable object and vice versa
it depends on if its hard or soft
i would say that the juggernaut would lose to the rhombus (sp?) because of its uneven sides and more so for the fact that its made by honda....
true that!
Leisa and S. 4 Life NM?
i would love to get high with the threadstarter...
i would just like to know where he gets his shit
LOL, after re-reading the thread, I was like "Damn this fucker is high as hell"
what if its a gas or a plasma? Then what!
white power!!!!!!.....1
I like bigdare's answer
BeFF <beef>
GECKOSQUAD
well if an unstoppable force comes across an unmovable object then the unstoppable force would keep on being unstoppable and the unmovable object would not be moved because the force went across it and not through it.
A huge nuclear explosion
what the fuck are you smoking?
...ninja
um....dayum!!
well if you can ask that then its not truely unmoveable. The molecular structure must change for it to change state. For example, parts of it must MOVE in order for it to be liquid or gas. And if they can NOT move, then the non stoppable object cant penetrate them.
Its a retarded scenario. The unmoveable object seems slightly more feasible than the unstoppable object.
But yeah its just retarded, its basically an undefined solution. In a conventional scenario, either the non stoppable object, stops( or bounces or whatever), or the non movable object moves. If the two possible outcomes are taken away that leaves no possible answer.
that is a direct quote from the movie imagine me and you, and the answer is that its a trick question... If a force is truly unstoppable, then no object will be able to hinder it, and likewise if a object is truly unmovable, then no force will be able to move it. Therefore, the two anomalies cannot exist in the same universe, and the question has no answer.
Quit quoting lesbian movies and thinking you are clever.
Fuck stance. Stance is for kids in skinny jeans with Justin Beiber haircuts. You don't need stance when you got swagger.
what type of weed are you smoking?
RONSTOPPABLE!!!
You do understand that I failed to answer this question seriously do to it's nature correct????
Leisa and S. 4 Life NM?
This question was answered when Chuck Norris round-house kicked himself in the face.
can milk stop water?
Tripod image hosting is the answer? That's deep...
Fuck stance. Stance is for kids in skinny jeans with Justin Beiber haircuts. You don't need stance when you got swagger.
Chuck Norris vs. Mr. T???
K series 626. That's right. It's got a K in it.
They go around the unmovable object because the unstoppable force does not stop.
/thread.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
