Quote:
You can't be less than 100% guilty. You're guilty or you're not guilty. If the man wasn't guilty then there would be reason to believe the jury was biased.
I think you are missing the point im making with this. The man is on trial for the accused murder of a black man. The jury is made up of 12 black men/women. This would never happen in an actual court of law because this said jury would have a biased opinion. Don't believe me, look how many people voted for Obama just because he was black.
Quote:
Miller used environment X, performed the test and it was conclusive. Someone else said it could have been environment Y, they tested it, it was inconclusive. Others said it could have been environment Z, A, B, C, whatever. No scientists have ever ruled out the first environment X.
can you show me non biased articles to support this?
Quote:
Where did I say evolution was a universal fact? I just looked through the whole thread and no where did I say that. I just said evolution only explained ONE thing. You are trying to argue that it IS universal.
I can show you exactly were you have said before that evolution is a "fact". And facts are universal, they cannot be only partly true.
Quote:
You mean search for correct answers
no i meant exactly what i said. Their actions speaks louder than their words. Richard Dawkins is a perfect example.
Can you elaborate with specifics or is no. no it doesn't considered an intelligent response?
I want to ask you another serious question. Do you believe that the evidences that are readily available today, can only be interpreted as supporting the theory of evolution? Or is/are there other possibilities?
Quote:
You understand adaptation right? If it suddenly started snowing every day in GA, you would buy a couple jackets, correct? You have adapted to your new environment right?
So what do you think when it happens on a cellular level. You get the flu virus. You get sick, your body fights it off, and now your well again, and your body now has the antibodies to fight off the flu again. Then NEXT YEAR, you get the flu again. A doctor tests you and it's 100% confirmed a flu virus. The virus looks almost exactly the same as the last one, except it has one little change in its appearance. All the information the virus carries however is the exact same.
What did the virus do???
You literally just made my point for me. Would you say, ( in your scenario provided) that i had evolved? No. That species have changed over time is absolutely observable, to say that they have changed on a molecular level and that every species known to man has come from the same ancestor....that is quite a leap of faith...excuse the pun.