I have been a very active member in the religion forum but took some time off for a while. Most of you know how i tried my best to defend my faith and to try and show others why i believed. God knows, and some of you as well, how many different threads used to be in this section lol. Well after a short pause, I am back. Hello again to those with whom I have had fierce debates with and I hope you all are doing great. Now, to business.......
I have seen countless times the case for creation and God shut down rather quickly due to a lack of " tangible" or "scientific " evidence. The biggest cause of this with mainstream athiests, is that they say they can not reproduce creation according to the scientific method....therefore it can not be. I have a question for you all that claim God does not exist.....Does your science actually answer your questions of " who are we", "why are we", and " how did we get here" or does it leave you rather with more questions? There seem to be mainly two schools of thought on " how did we get here". We have Creation or intelligent design and The big bang theory/evolution. I will not sit here and try and explain why God is real or try and prove Him by scientific method. I will not simply say," because the Bible says so" either. Instead I will try and see why some of you go with science rather than the supernatural.
Now, most of us on this board have not gone to school to study physics, evolution, genetics, astrology, ect.... Most of us rather are just normal people working 9-5 that have questions and have done our fair share of research to try and answer the questions we so desperately want a definitive answer to. It is common knowledge that the theory of the Big Bang begins with Einsteins theory of relativity. That theory was then expanded upon by Friedmann and so on and so forth. There are many different models of this theory all which make certain assumptions...i.e. is the universe homogeneous or not...ect....
I have looked into the different models and different theories quite a bit and i found myself more confused at the end than when i began. The conclusion ( in its most simplistic form) that I came up with was this....Some really smart guy long ago came up with the theory of gravity and time and so on based on mathematical equations and information that was available to the current scientific community and for a century it has stood. Then another smart guy came and did some more math and made more assumptions and stated, " Ah HA!!!!! Eurika!!!! I know where the universe came from!" It all started 13 billion or so years ago when there was nothing but infinite heat and matter and all of a sudden it exploded and helium bonded with another element and so on and then there were stars and planets and such!
But then someone asks, " but why did this happen? and where did this all come from?" Then some more assumptions were made and it was concluded that the universe is expanding....and there was at one point....a beggining or singularity. However entertaining this explanation is with its very advanced math and use of big words....it leaves one still questioning. As more knowledge became known and more questions came, there came more models...now, some believe there to be many universes( many theories on this yet strangely no evidence to suggest this) and so on and so forth.
My point is this, none of you have studied physics nor anything else to do with the universe. No one knows for sure that the men and women that came up with these so called "scientific" proofs, formulas, theories, ect are even right. I mean, these scientist started their studies from nothing and all of a sudden come up with evidences. How to we know their calculations are right? What happens in another 100 years when new information is discovered and these models become ridiculous? You say there is no God yet you believe faithfully the studies of a man you never met nor have the knowledge to test.
Someone please answer this question intelligently....Knowing that the law of cause and effect is indisputable, so why then believe in the big bang theory over God when in fact, it does not answer how the universe originated? We were not there at the beggining or before it, so then why is it safe to assume that we as humans can explain the origin with our extremely limited knowledge of ourselves and the universe?