Quote Originally Posted by Jaimecbr900
Very good point, but how come part of that "resolution of truth" can't include divine intervention as a possible answer?
Because it's not a scientific principle, divine intervention is not in the realm of science.

Quote Originally Posted by Jaimecbr900
Again, a very good point. Divinity is pretty black and white. It wouldn't leave much room for it to evolve itself. Although, if that I.D. being taught can be taught using not only one religious point of view but many. The only common denominator the majority of religions have is a Supreme being.
It's not really an issue of religion. If they are advancing I.D. as a scientific theory, then it needs to be held to scientific standards. Here's how dictionary.com defines science in this context...

The observation, identification, description, experimental investigation, and theoretical explanation of phenomena.
Now was I.D. arrived at through observation? Can there be an experimental investigation? The answer of course is no. God is simply not a scientifically valid answer for why things happen, regardless of it's truth. I realize that might be hard to accept on it's face, but if you think about it you'll probably see why.

Quote Originally Posted by Jaimecbr900
I don't know. I've got to admit that you've got me to thinking.
Good.

Quote Originally Posted by Jaimecbr900
Maybe I'm wrong. Maybe Science is Science and I.D. is more Phylosophy. The only thing is that Evolution is taught as part of Science though. So in order to counter balance it, I.D. would have to be taught in a Science curriculum. Hmmmmm....
Evolution is science, arrived at through observation and experimentation. It's been open to scientific debate and passed muster to become accepted. I.D. can make none of those claims.