I will say this though.
Romney>McCain>Obama
In that order.
I will say this though.
Romney>McCain>Obama
In that order.
Epic Foxbody Thread Crew Member #10Originally Posted by AlanŽ
And I will say this.Originally Posted by redGT
Obama > Romney > McCain. In that order. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/0..._n_116632.html lol @ McCain. I'd have more respect for your choice if you told me you were voting for McCain because you flipped a coin. Just sayin'
Last edited by abandon; 08-06-2008 at 11:38 PM.
Romney, in the debates, validated his support for the Iraq war by relating it to 9/11.Originally Posted by abandon
That's right. There's still people who think Iraq was in on 9/11. And probably the assassination of JFK, the disappearance of Jimmy Hoffa and the crucifixition of Jesus, too.
As a side note and further reply to the person who said I used a thesaurus to make my replies rich in complex vocabulary but lacking in substance, some people like myself went and got an education and are therefore able to reach into our brains for information (such as the words you declared "big") rather than simply being ignorant.
lol @ you for being insecure when it became apparent to you that your intellect, in comparison to mine, is feeble and thus went out of your way to say that I must not actually be as intelligent as I seem in order to comfort yourself.
Last edited by The12lber; 08-07-2008 at 02:23 AM.
I personally know nothing about Romney. RedGT put him after McCain so I just decided to turn it around. I don't support anything that man does so I'd rather ignore anything he has to say. If he's one of the people who thinks Iraq had something to do with 9/11 then he and his supporters are a bunch of buffoons.Originally Posted by The12lber
For McCain lovers take a look at this video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GEtZl...eature=related
His style of speech rivals that of my 10 year old nephew. Why would anyone with any common sense vote for this dipsh*t? I just don't understand what everyone sees in him to think he'll be a better president than Obama.
Last edited by abandon; 08-07-2008 at 02:51 AM.
Wow you know what. I was actually willing to give you a shot on this board but by calling people who agree with a canidate a "buffons" is uncalled for.Originally Posted by abandon
And BTW I put Romney ahead of McCain AND OBAMA.
Epic Foxbody Thread Crew Member #10Originally Posted by AlanŽ
Excuse me? Give me a shot? Hah, hilarious, simply hilarious. What makes you think I care what you have to say in this matter? I called Romney supporters buffoons because anyone who still thinks terrorist were the cause of what happened on 9/11 are just that, buffoons, imbeciles, morons. You get the point.Originally Posted by redGT
So you put Romney infront of McCain. Uh, k. I put Obama infront of them, so what? That doesn't change the fact that you're a buffoon.
Your posts continue to show just how much of a buffon you are. It's amazing to me how just about everyone else on here can have a civilized discussion on candates and politics WITHOUT calling others names for their views yet you come on here and immediately start insulting people.Originally Posted by abandon
Ad hominem. Look it up. You'll find it's one of the worst ways to make your point. Hence why it makes the list of Logical Fallacies
Epic Foxbody Thread Crew Member #10Originally Posted by AlanŽ
Romney's a pretty remarkable candidate actually. Until you get to his foreign policy. At that point I thought to myself "holy ****, this man is a ****ing idiot". It was a real buzzkill for me.Originally Posted by redGT
I did some fairly thorough research on candidates in my down time, and probably my largest disappointment was in McCain.
The least surprising was probably Giuliani. A loud mouthed, arrogant, aggressive, ignorant mayor with presidential aspirations. He's truly the white version of Ahmadinejad (the Iranian president who was formerly mayor of Tehran).