Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 41 to 80 of 90

Thread: Who Puts A 2JZ Into An FD???

  1. #41
    Senior Member | IA Veteran Catnip's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Age
    35
    Posts
    19,743
    Rep Power
    49

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by EJ25RUN
    Think of it like a two stroke, there are easier ways to do something, but you prove more when you take the challenge. And i probably bring this up to much but at Le Mans, no one has a better finishing record than Rotary Mazdas.

    The only races I've watched with rotaries and pistons motors, the rotary cars dropped back about 5 places when the track went uphill
    '92 C2500 6.5 Turbo Diesel | '96 240sx

  2. #42
    D-Fence-Less Sport1.3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Canton, GA
    Age
    41
    Posts
    10,056
    Rep Power
    34

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by EJ25RUN
    Think of it like a two stroke, there are easier ways to do something, but you prove more when you take the challenge.

    there are also hundreds of capable rotary builders, even in the state of GA (we are home to Downing after all)....though most will be found in the aviation field. Rotaries are very popular in small prop type personal aircrafts.
    -Super cool .gif TO UNBAN JITB, JM, Buttons AND NEMISIS here-

  3. #43
    Senior Member | IA Veteran Catnip's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Age
    35
    Posts
    19,743
    Rep Power
    49

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sport1.3
    Rotaries are very popular in small prop type personal aircrafts.
    Is that why them bishes always crashin?
    '92 C2500 6.5 Turbo Diesel | '96 240sx

  4. #44
    Senior Member | IA Veteran Elbow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Atlanta
    Posts
    29,397
    Rep Power
    66

    Default

    I do like LS swapped FD's...

    It's just a 2JZ swapped FD seems weird.

    I know people and have heard of cars with rotaries running for a LONG time if you take care of them PROPERLLY.

  5. #45
    Senior Member | IA Veteran  OneSlow5pt0's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Buslengths behind you
    Age
    36
    Posts
    13,406
    Rep Power
    35

    Default

    well when i see another japanesse car win le mans ill give them respect

    until then mazda > all others

  6. #46
    AmbitiousButRubbish EJ25RUN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Daytona Beach
    Age
    38
    Posts
    15,152
    Rep Power
    45

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cgEvan
    The only races I've watched with rotaries and pistons motors, the rotary cars dropped back about 5 places when the track went uphill
    I'm not gonna respond cause you obviously haven't a clue, do you really not know anything about racing or are you just being ignorant?

  7. #47
    Senior Member | IA Veteran Elbow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Atlanta
    Posts
    29,397
    Rep Power
    66

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by EJ25RUN
    I'm not gonna respond cause you obviously haven't a clue, do you really not know anything about racing or are you just being ignorant?
    lol my thought as well.

  8. #48
    AmbitiousButRubbish EJ25RUN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Daytona Beach
    Age
    38
    Posts
    15,152
    Rep Power
    45

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by HypnoToad
    well when i see another japanesse car win le mans ill give them respect

    until then mazda > all others
    Nissan, Toyota, and Honda all spent millions and millions and Mazda won with a car that wasn't even in the highest class.

  9. #49
    Senior Member | IA Veteran  OneSlow5pt0's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Buslengths behind you
    Age
    36
    Posts
    13,406
    Rep Power
    35

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by EJ25RUN
    Nissan, Toyota, and Honda all spent millions and millions and Mazda won with a car that wasn't even in the highest class.
    i guess cause rotary is worthless

  10. #50
    Senior Member | IA Veteran Catnip's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Age
    35
    Posts
    19,743
    Rep Power
    49

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by EJ25RUN
    I'm not gonna respond cause you obviously haven't a clue, do you really not know anything about racing or are you just being ignorant?

    Like I said, the races I've seen with both rotary cars and piston cars, the rotaries always dropped back when they had to go uphill. The commentator (sp?) said something to the effect of, "if you pay attention when the track goes uphill, you will notice the rotary powered cars always lose a couple places."

    I don't know what is ignorant about anything I said, except the plane crashing comment... but I was joking with that.
    '92 C2500 6.5 Turbo Diesel | '96 240sx

  11. #51
    AmbitiousButRubbish EJ25RUN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Daytona Beach
    Age
    38
    Posts
    15,152
    Rep Power
    45

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by HypnoToad
    i guess cause rotary is worthless
    Sauber-Mercedes, Jaguar, Peugeot, Kremer Porsche, all lost to the 787B

  12. #52
    AmbitiousButRubbish EJ25RUN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Daytona Beach
    Age
    38
    Posts
    15,152
    Rep Power
    45

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cgEvan
    Like I said, the races I've seen with both rotary cars and piston cars, the rotaries always dropped back when they had to go uphill. The commentator (sp?) said something to the effect of, "if you pay attention when the track goes uphill, you will notice the rotary powered cars always lose a couple places."

    I don't know what is ignorant about anything I said, except the plane crashing comment... but I was joking with that.
    then watch what i posted in previous post. That is a 1000 hp Mercedes C11

    And here is a link to everyone else that lost.

    http://www.racingsportscars.com/phot...-23-photo.html



    The Norton TT F1 champs


    PETE HALSMER GTU Champion

  13. #53
    Senior Member | IA Veteran Catnip's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Age
    35
    Posts
    19,743
    Rep Power
    49

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by EJ25RUN
    then watch what i posted in previous link. That is a 1000 hp Mercedes C11

    And here is a link to everyone else that lost.

    http://www.racingsportscars.com/phot...-23-photo.html
    I would, but a rotary motor with 100k+ miles would be faster than my internet.




    '92 C2500 6.5 Turbo Diesel | '96 240sx

  14. #54
    D-Fence-Less Sport1.3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Canton, GA
    Age
    41
    Posts
    10,056
    Rep Power
    34

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cgEvan
    The only races I've watched with rotaries and pistons motors, the rotary cars dropped back about 5 places when the track went uphill

    oh burn! lol


    they arent horrible in stock classes....i just have a personal grudge against them being a previous owner. Though i still like the cars
    -Super cool .gif TO UNBAN JITB, JM, Buttons AND NEMISIS here-

  15. #55
    AmbitiousButRubbish EJ25RUN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Daytona Beach
    Age
    38
    Posts
    15,152
    Rep Power
    45

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cgEvan
    I would, but a rotary motor with 100k+ miles would be faster than my internet.
    2008 Daytona 24 hour GT class winner.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xk7hcjX8fVU


  16. #56
    ATL's Slow3st DSM!!! Ronsam2006's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Atlanta
    Age
    37
    Posts
    2,098
    Rep Power
    21

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by EJ25RUN
    Sorry but yes it does. Very few mechanics are properly trained to work on a Rotary and not many diy mechanics are up to it either. A rotary is not a failed item from the factory like the 7 bolt dsm was.
    The Renesis motor from the Rx-8 was definitely a fail. Sure the 7 bolt has its fualts, but which motor doesn't. The 6 bolt 4G63 however, was probably the best 4 cylinder turbo motor ever built.

  17. #57
    AmbitiousButRubbish EJ25RUN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Daytona Beach
    Age
    38
    Posts
    15,152
    Rep Power
    45

    Default

    And then there is this car that can do oh so much with 300hp.

    RE Amemiya Racing Asparadrink Mazda RX-7 FD3S



    The 2006 GT300 champion car and winner of round 1 in 2008.

  18. #58
    D-Fence-Less Sport1.3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Canton, GA
    Age
    41
    Posts
    10,056
    Rep Power
    34

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by EJ25RUN
    And then there is this car that can do oh so much with 300hp.

    RE Amemiya Racing Asparadrink Mazda RX-7 FD3S



    The 2006 GT300 champion car and winner of round 1 in 2008.

    What about the GT500 class
    -Super cool .gif TO UNBAN JITB, JM, Buttons AND NEMISIS here-

  19. #59
    AmbitiousButRubbish EJ25RUN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Daytona Beach
    Age
    38
    Posts
    15,152
    Rep Power
    45

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ronsam2006
    The Renesis motor from the Rx-8 was definitely a fail. Sure the 7 bolt has its fualts, but which motor doesn't. The 6 bolt 4G63 however, was probably the best 4 cylinder turbo motor ever built.
    I'll explain to you why it wasn;t a fail. Compare it to the N/A 13b that came before it. Compare how much worse the emissions were from that engine to the Renesis. Why else did it win so many awards.

    i hate to quote wiki but......

    These and other innovative technologies allow the Renesis to achieve 49% higher output and dramatically reduced fuel consumption and emissions (the RX-8 meets LEV-II). It won International Engine of the Year and Best New Engine awards 2003 and also holds the "2.5 to 3 litre" size award for 2003 and 2004, where it is considered a 2.60 L engine. Finally, it was on the Ward's 10 Best Engines list for 2004 and 2005.

    The Renesis has also been adapted for a dual-fuel use, allowing it to run either on gasoline or hydrogen.


    4G63 is a turbo motor so efficiency cant be compared to an N/A motor. And Honda's F22c is still the highest HP/Liter ever on that front.

  20. #60
    FD + 2JZ = WIN! :] YoshiFD3S's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Canton, GA
    Age
    39
    Posts
    1,086
    Rep Power
    22

    Default

    f*CK YOU HATERS~!!!!

    BAHAHHAHAHHAA

    *points to his signature*

  21. #61
    AmbitiousButRubbish EJ25RUN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Daytona Beach
    Age
    38
    Posts
    15,152
    Rep Power
    45

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sport1.3
    What about the GT500 class
    You are smart enough to know that the GT500 class was created to let the manufactures have a field to compete with unlimited budgets. That is why 2008 GT500 class cars have superior Aero to ACO/FIA GT1 class race cars and the only thing faster around a race track than a GT500 car with closed fenders is a prototype. A tuner like RE Amemiya can't afford a 100 million a year budget on a racing sport. That is why GT300 is fought amongst high end tuner companies.

    I mean.....remember my front engined NSX prototype Honda is testing? And to those that say, "we'll isn't MR better weight distribution" go read the GT500 rule book to understand.


  22. #62
    D-Fence-Less Sport1.3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Canton, GA
    Age
    41
    Posts
    10,056
    Rep Power
    34

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by EJ25RUN
    You are smart enough to know that the GT500 class was created to let the manufactures have a field to compete with unlimited budgets. That is why 2008 GT500 class cars have superior Aero to ACO/FIA GT1 class race cars and the only thing faster around a race track than a GT500 car with closed fenders is a prototype. A tuner like RE Amemiya can't afford a 100 million a year budget on a racing sport. That is why GT300 is fought amongst high end tuner companies.

    I mean.....remember my front engined NSX prototype Honda is testing? And to those that say, "we'll isn't MR better weight distribution" go read the GT500 rule book to understand.



    no factory backing huh?

    remember not even too long ago Toyota was using heavily modified 3sgte's instead of the 6 cylinders......they were retarded fast......then led to a custom 1 off v8 specifically made for the series....and again Domination......its insane the steps they take and or are allowed to take in that series.....but its still insanely competitive and fun to watch
    -Super cool .gif TO UNBAN JITB, JM, Buttons AND NEMISIS here-

  23. #63
    Jay G. 1439/2000's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Location, Location...
    Posts
    6,375
    Rep Power
    30

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cgEvan
    Sorry, but if there's 3 guys that can make a rotary reliable, that's not win.
    IDC about no damn 7 bolts. BTW, bad mpg, high temps, and no reliability (except the few...) is not success.... in fact I think it's called inefficiency.
    Don't run your mouth.

    I get 32 mpg hwy, make 330whp with the stock turbo on a streetport, and haven't had any issues no matter how hard I beat on it.

    That plus colonwrecking new DSM people that don't know who I am am is ****ing funny.

  24. #64
    D-Fence-Less Sport1.3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Canton, GA
    Age
    41
    Posts
    10,056
    Rep Power
    34

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 1439/2000
    Don't run your mouth.

    I get 32 mpg hwy, make 330whp with the stock turbo on a streetport, and haven't had any issues no matter how hard I beat on it.

    That plus colonwrecking new DSM people that don't know who I am am is ****ing funny.


    have fun with your carbon lock see ya in 6 months









    i kid, i wouldnt wish that on anyone
    -Super cool .gif TO UNBAN JITB, JM, Buttons AND NEMISIS here-

  25. #65
    AmbitiousButRubbish EJ25RUN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Daytona Beach
    Age
    38
    Posts
    15,152
    Rep Power
    45

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sport1.3

    no factory backing huh?
    remember not even too long ago Toyota was using heavily modified 3sgte's instead of the 6 cylinders......they were retarded fast......then led to a custom 1 off v8 specifically made for the series....and again Domination......its insane the steps they take and or are allowed to take in that series.....but its still insanely competitive and fun to watch
    That motor went in to a Front engine rear drive celica which has now become a mid engined IS-F...notice the air scoop on roof and doors.



    The GTR is also running a 4.5L V8 with a F/R setup




    the "current" NSX uses a longitudinal Mugen made C32 and new to the series BMW has shoehorned a V8 into a Z4



    In 2008, im most happy that a TRUE 4WD car has finally won a race since the R34 dropped the RB26 and 4WD for a 3.0tt v6 with F/R.

    Symmetric AWD at that.
    Last edited by EJ25RUN; 09-11-2008 at 05:19 PM.

  26. #66
    Senior Member | IA Veteran man's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Age
    39
    Posts
    6,690
    Rep Power
    29

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PURE jdm
    Why would you drive a rx.... thats stupid.





    IA Rules doesn't allow these images in sigs

    - IA Mgmt

  27. #67
    D-Fence-Less Sport1.3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Canton, GA
    Age
    41
    Posts
    10,056
    Rep Power
    34

    Default

    good info/pics
    -Super cool .gif TO UNBAN JITB, JM, Buttons AND NEMISIS here-

  28. #68
    Slowest Car on IA David88vert's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Johns Creek
    Age
    53
    Posts
    8,378
    Rep Power
    37

    Default

    I've probably owned more rotarys than anyone else on this board. I've had several that made over 200K without any engine problems. Out of all of them, one one motor has blown, and that was at the track, and due to my fault. It still drive home from Moroso - and was driving around a month later without a rebuild. Rotarys are reliable if you know how to maintain them.

    2JZs are also good reliable motors, but I prefer to keep them in Supras. There is nothing wrong with the Supra either, it's just a different shell.

  29. #69
    Lurker Brick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Canton, GA
    Posts
    943
    Rep Power
    21

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sport1.3
    Anything is better than a rotary
    What he said.

  30. #70
    Senior Member Z33_kid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    homie dont play that
    Age
    45
    Posts
    4,794
    Rep Power
    25

    Default

    maybe they want to be somewhat unique n get on a magazine or something
    ....True ////OFFSET\\\\

  31. #71
    Senior Member | IA Veteran Elbow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Atlanta
    Posts
    29,397
    Rep Power
    66

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nick McCardle
    What he said.
    Yeah you are smart

  32. #72
    AmbitiousButRubbish EJ25RUN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Daytona Beach
    Age
    38
    Posts
    15,152
    Rep Power
    45

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Z33_kid
    maybe they want to be somewhat unique n get on a magazine or something
    That seems to be the trend i guess. Am i the only one that thinks motor swaps should atleast come from the same car brand.






    Anybody?

  33. #73
    jort enthusiast alpine_aw11's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    kangarooster meadows
    Age
    35
    Posts
    4,382
    Rep Power
    24

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by EJ25RUN
    That seems to be the trend i guess. Am i the only one that thinks motor swaps should atleast come from the same car brand.






    Anybody?
    It depends on how you look at it. Some people will like the chassis of a car, but maybe their favorite motor to work with comes from a different car brand. You can't really speak for everyone on this issue, some people will have legitimate reasons for doing these kinds of swaps. Like this guy, maybe he doesn't prefer a rotary engine, but loves the FD chassis, which happens to be arguably the best to ever come out of Japan. And the 2jz, you can't really argue with that motor except for the weight issue. It's complicated, but it really depends on what the owner wants and I think that's all that matters. What I think the best example for this is Jeeps. A Chevy V8 swap is extremely common, and also very easy to do. The inline 6 can only do so much, and the only other options are from the old CJ's and modern GC's, and those V8's don't compare to the Chevy 350 as far as reliability and ease of modification are concerned.

  34. #74
    AmbitiousButRubbish EJ25RUN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Daytona Beach
    Age
    38
    Posts
    15,152
    Rep Power
    45

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by alpine_xj
    It depends on how you look at it. Some people will like the chassis of a car, but maybe their favorite motor to work with comes from a different car brand. You can't really speak for everyone on this issue, some people will have legitimate reasons for doing these kinds of swaps. Like this guy, maybe he doesn't prefer a rotary engine, but loves the FD chassis, which happens to be arguably the best to ever come out of Japan. And the 2jz, you can't really argue with that motor except for the weight issue. It's complicated, but it really depends on what the owner wants and I think that's all that matters.
    Basically a kit car mindframe.

  35. #75
    jort enthusiast alpine_aw11's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    kangarooster meadows
    Age
    35
    Posts
    4,382
    Rep Power
    24

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by EJ25RUN
    Basically a kit car mindframe.
    I don't know if that's an insult, but regardless I would love to built a kit car some day if I ever have the time and money.

  36. #76
    ATL's Slow3st DSM!!! Ronsam2006's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Atlanta
    Age
    37
    Posts
    2,098
    Rep Power
    21

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by EJ25RUN
    I'll explain to you why it wasn;t a fail. Compare it to the N/A 13b that came before it. Compare how much worse the emissions were from that engine to the Renesis. Why else did it win so many awards.

    i hate to quote wiki but......

    These and other innovative technologies allow the Renesis to achieve 49% higher output and dramatically reduced fuel consumption and emissions (the RX-8 meets LEV-II). It won International Engine of the Year and Best New Engine awards 2003 and also holds the "2.5 to 3 litre" size award for 2003 and 2004, where it is considered a 2.60 L engine. Finally, it was on the Ward's 10 Best Engines list for 2004 and 2005.

    The Renesis has also been adapted for a dual-fuel use, allowing it to run either on gasoline or hydrogen.


    4G63 is a turbo motor so efficiency cant be compared to an N/A motor. And Honda's F22c is still the highest HP/Liter ever on that front.
    So what are the NA Rx-7s good for? Saying they have low displacement along with low HP tied with horrible gas mileage?

  37. #77
    AmbitiousButRubbish EJ25RUN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Daytona Beach
    Age
    38
    Posts
    15,152
    Rep Power
    45

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ronsam2006
    So what are the NA Rx-7s good for? Saying they have low displacement along with low HP tied with horrible gas mileage?
    Not necessarily. You add a 1 more rotor and have a NA motor with 450hp (20b) or add add a 2nd rotor (r26b) and you are north of 600hp. Lightly built and tuned obviously.

    I guessing the way you see hp and performance, yes a 1.2 or a 1.3 N/A rotary are just not good enough.

  38. #78
    Senior Member | IA Veteran Catnip's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Age
    35
    Posts
    19,743
    Rep Power
    49

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by EJ25RUN
    Not necessarily. You add a 1 more rotor and have a NA motor with 450hp (20b) or add add a 2nd rotor (r26b) and you are north of 600hp. Lightly built and tuned obviously.

    I guessing the way you see hp and performance, yes a 1.2 or a 1.3 N/A rotary are just not good enough.

    Correct me if I'm wrong, because well, I know nothing of rotaries , but aren't multiple rotor motors pretty large... like stuffing an inline 6 in or something?
    '92 C2500 6.5 Turbo Diesel | '96 240sx

  39. #79
    resident honda hater redrumracer's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Age
    39
    Posts
    11,983
    Rep Power
    34

    Default

    lsx in a rx is > that all other motors put in it.. and dont give me weight bs, the ls is an aluminum motor and is lighter that the stock equipment and they have kits to bolt it right in.

  40. #80
    just a lil SOHC... B_Hoov's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Flowery Branch
    Age
    39
    Posts
    2,185
    Rep Power
    23

    Default

    i have seen a rotary in a chevelle...and a nova...and the mustang with the rb from 3fast and furious...seems anything goes now days...

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
About us
ImportAtlanta is a community of gearheads and car enthusiasts. It does not matter what kind of car or bike you drive, IA is an open community for any gearhead. Whether you're looking for advice on a performance build or posting your wheels for sale, you're welcome here!
Announcement
Welcome back to ImportAtlanta. We are currently undergoing many changes, so please report any issues you encounter with the site using the 'Contact Us' button below. Thank you!