-IA MGMT is inappropriate.
kinda a repost homie
Texan kills 2 guys breaking in next door
Last edited by bigdare23; 11-27-2007 at 11:28 PM.
					
						
					
						
					
						
					
						
					
						
					
						
					
				
			
			
			
				how is there kinda a repost? its either a repost or not a repost.....either way thats how do it in texas! haha i would have shot the faqqots too, or planned to anyway.
- 1993 Honda Civic VX
- 2008 Acura TL-S
Originally Posted by Schugg
I was trying to nice about it beside just coming out and posting ****ING REPOST
![]()
					
						
					
						
					
						
					
						
					
						
					
						
					
						
					
						
					
						
					
						
					
				
			
			
			
				the op was in the wrong section so ****em
-IA MGMT is inappropriate.
Fuck your repostOriginally Posted by Leadfoot_mf
2006 Evo IX - Bolt ons
					
						
					
						
					
						
					
						
					
						
					
						
					
						
					
						
					
						
					
						
					
				
			
			
			
				heard it on 99x last week. the actual 911 recording is f*cking hilarious. Apparently there's actually a law though in Texas that states you can protect yours or your neighbor's property with lethal force if necessary and if the neighbor gives you permission.
					
						
					
						
					
						
					
						
					
						
					
						
					
						
					
						
					
						
					
						
					
				
			
			
			
				http://www.filecabi.net/video/neighbour-shotgun.htmlOriginally Posted by KDM guy
-IA MGMT is inappropriate.
I believe the guy was in the right, but it could have been handle a lot better. He first should have stopped the guys before they enter the house, which to me constitutes protecting your neighbors. But instead he comes out after the deed is done and shoots the thieves. He is a very lucky guy, b/c he put himself in harms way when their was no reason for it. He did the right thing by quickly calling the cops and the cops responded in a very fast matter. He should have just stayed on the phone and let the cops do their job, b/c he could have been shot by either the thieves or the cops (u never know)
It sounded like he was trigger happy and wanted to play the hero role. In conclusion, If you steal you better be prepared to die
2006 Evo IX - Bolt ons
they broke in got killed........oh well.
heard this on the bubba the love sponge show the day after it happened....greatest story on earth..the 911 audio is the greatest
haha..2 less theives in the US
http://www.netdisaster.com/go.php?mo...d.php?t=149714
heres what I think
Dude, I F'ing live in the city in happened in...well, atleast till Dec 22.
But anyways, it was some country a$$ redneck mutha ****a...and regardless if the two guys were breaking and entering and stealing some ****, they didn't deserve to die over it
Just F'ing INSANE!!!
~*Jailyn*~
yeah, your right...they didint deserve what they got.......but tell me that when(and i'm not hoping this happens to you)Originally Posted by Mach1DrmGrl
A: someone breaks into your house, damaging a window or door and steals **** you've saved money to buy, destroying you sense of security/sanctuary
B: someone sticks a gun in your face, takin **** outta your pockets for themselves...
					
						
					
						
					
						
					
						
					
						
					
						
					
				
			
			
			
				Originally Posted by Mach1DrmGrl
maybe didn't deserve to die, but did deserve to get their punk asses shot, its there fault they died. if they weren't stealing they wouldn't have got shot leading to them being dead
- 1993 Honda Civic VX
- 2008 Acura TL-S
+1!!!!
They were willing to accept that risk. Anytime you break into someones house you risk someone armed being inside. They should of thought of that BEFORE they broke in. I hope this guy doesn't get charged with anything.Originally Posted by Mach1DrmGrl
The cops were about 1 minute too late. They would of went straight to the callers house to ask questions. The robbers would of been just far enough to see the cops arrive, and keep running.
Georgia has that law as well. If you believe that it is to stop and/or protect against a forcible felony and you have the legal duty to protect (TX is the exact same way as well), you can defend property:Originally Posted by KDM guy
O.C.G.A. § 16-3-24
Use of force in defense of property other than a habitation
(a) A person is justified in threatening or using force against another when and to the extent that he reasonably believes that such threat or force is necessary to prevent or terminate such other's trespass on or other tortious or criminal interference with real property other than a habitation or personal property:
(1) Lawfully in his possession;
(2) Lawfully in the possession of a member of his immediate family; or
(3) Belonging to a person whose property he has a legal duty to protect.
(b) The use of force which is intended or likely to cause death or great bodily harm to prevent trespass on or other tortious or criminal interference with real property other than a habitation or personal property is not justified unless the person using such force reasonably believes that it is necessary to prevent the commission of a forcible felony.
AIM: RuinerTT
2005 Nissan Pathfinder LE
I disagree.Originally Posted by Mach1DrmGrl
Here is a real situation:
Back when I had my 911 turbo, I had a guy at a gas station at 12:30am at night open up my passenger door and get INTO my vehicle (while I was in the driver's seat). I put a gun to his head and had he made any sudden moves, I would have shot.
Now, given the circumstances that I could have shot the suspect, would you say that he deserved to die or not? I would say that he deserved to die given the situation that he put both himself and myself in. If his death guarantees my life and safety given his crime, he deserved to die.
The same goes for this story. What you probably are not understanding is that when he confronted them, they came INTO HIS YARD as they were leaving and/or confronting him as well. It wasn't like he ran after them and shot them in the back. They came into HIS YARD and he had to defend himself. There is no telling what they might have done to him had he not shot them.
AIM: RuinerTT
2005 Nissan Pathfinder LE
					
						
					
						
					
						
					
						
					
						
					
						
					
				
			
			
			
				Originally Posted by Ruiner
cause chances are his house was either next to get jack, or when they seen him they would have had to do something. like the news said old people are getting beat to death all the time now. ide shoot them now being young, so ide definetly shoot them when im old and helpless. probably have more fun with it, shoot them in the legs or something and go beat them with my cane or something.
- 1993 Honda Civic VX
- 2008 Acura TL-S
He said he was going to kill them before he even went outside. He knew what he was going to do. I don't think he was really afraid of his life (atleast not that day). Or he would of stayed inside, and only shot if they came into his house. I still don't think he should be charged. They got what they deserved. If we could all get away with this A REAL JOB would start looking like a better idea to these assholes. He's lucky he is in Texas. If he is charged, a grand jury will not convict him. I will bet anyone $100 right now on that.
yeah i heard, i can't wait til i get a similar opportunity![]()
^ that's pretty dumb. I would never want to kill someone unless they do harm to me or my family. I couldn't live with the fact that I killed someone over them robbing my neighbor's house. I would simply call the cops and let them know what is going on. Even if they came on my property, I would still handle it calmy. Once they tried to break-in to my house, I would use force. Anything outside the house that they're trying to break in to, I would simlply call the cops. They're there to protect and serve, right? But then again, maybe that's just me. I know some of you wouldn't do it my way.
BUY MY HATCH <--click the link, cuz.
Yes, they are, but not always in the timely fashion that you may want. That may or may not be in their control, but cops can't be everywhere at once. Sometimes you have to "protect" your own stuff w/o the benefit of the cops being there.Originally Posted by AirBrcak
AIM: RuinerTT
2005 Nissan Pathfinder LE
Killing someone just because you don't like them is 1 thing. Killing a worthless theif that does not value his own life is another. I would not lose any sleep over killing a theif.Originally Posted by AirBrcak
					
						
					
						
					
						
					
						
					
				
			
			 
			
				So if someone tries to steal your iPod or backpack or something they deserve to die? That's the conclusion I reach using the logic I am hearing from some people here. I am all for protecting yourself if you feel your life is being threatened but damn, some of you all are some cold blooded motha ****as. If thiefs deserve the death sentence, what should we do with murderers and rapists?
Go figure it would be 2 beaners. Meh, obviously they were not contributing to society in any kinda way, just leeching off other peoples hard earned sh!t. 2 less sh!t head on the street if you ask me. I wish this would happen to more thieves.
02' Miata
The 9-1-1 call didn't really support this guys story in my opinion. It sounds like he went outside of his home with the premeditated notion of killing these guys. He even said he was going to kill them. I'd like to know if they really came into his yard or if he shot them as they were trying to flee. Most people don't stick around after a shotgun has been fired. This guy fired at least 3 shots so, I'm pretty interested to see if the investigation will be made public. I don't have sympathy for thieves but, having homicidal vigilantes running wild isn't a very good trade off.
they get drawn and quartered....Originally Posted by bu villain
Originally Posted by AirBrcak
^ that's pretty dumb. I would never want to kill someone unless they do harm to me or my family. I couldn't live with the fact that I killed someone over them robbing my neighbor's house. I would simply call the cops and let them know what is going on. Even if they came on my property, I would still handle it calmy. Once they tried to break-in to my house, I would use force. Anything outside the house that they're trying to break in to, I would simlply call the cops. They're there to protect and serve, right? But then again, maybe that's just me. I know some of you wouldn't do it my way.
Originally Posted by RUINER
![]()
Last edited by Ruiner; 11-29-2007 at 10:21 PM.
That's the way I feel yes.Originally Posted by bu villain
You gonna shoot them with you're new rifle????Originally Posted by shagwAg3n
i would say, until he's in a similar situation, he can't say what he'll do. hell, when i got robbed once, i was sarcastic as hell with the guy, and oddly not even scared, just annoyed that:
1: i used a payphone i knew i shouldn't've been on, due to the crime rate in the area at the time.
2: i was not looking out around me, just looking down at the phone booth itself, getting ready to finish the call.
what you do is what you do when the issue happens. nothing more, nothing less.
theres a difference between someone taking something out of your backpack out in public, and when someone is breaking into your home where you and your family and your children, if you have them, are supposed to be safe.Originally Posted by bu villain
if you think that these two situations are even remotely comparable you should be knocked the fuc.k out.
if someone comes into my home and they are not invited or i dont know them, they will be shot..... whether they even have the chance to take anything or not. they will die. shoot first ask questions later. If someone enters someone else's home they have mentally already made the decision that attempting to steal whatever it is that they find, is more valuable than their own life.
you come into my home uninvited you go out in a body bag.
end of story
EF SQUAD FTMFW!!!!![]()
Dude, said he was going to kill them, then proceeded to confront them, and do so.
That shows his decisions were premeditated, and not out of self defense.
"Property's not worth killing someone over."
He went outside lethally armed, and engaged, and killed the suspects, before they had done anything to show they were going to actively engage him, or burglarize his property.
					
						
					
						
					
						
					
						
					
						
					
						
					
						
					
						
					
						
					
				
			
			
			
				He was wrong to shoot the robbers w/ a shotgun. A shotgun is not the best weapon to hold in your house for defensive reasons. If he had a regular handgun and shot them in the legs it would have been alright case. The robbers got wounded in the legs and arrested. He purposley shot them w/ a shotgun (shotgun is pretty much death when close range). He should not be allowed to carry a shotgun anymore and serve a lil time. I mean come on, if i witnessed that w/ a shotgun i would probably shoot up straight in the air and say freeze. Dont move or i will shoot. If they see a shotgun they will stop. This is why we have police, some civilians get scared and panick during these circumstances and do something they shouldnt. I understand if it was his house and they had a gun on them, but they had crowbars.
In the legs? AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAOriginally Posted by Greddypacked
Oh ****, hang on....AHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Answer me this: do you watch a lot of movies?
Ahahahah, shoot them in the legs...hahahahahhahahahaha. ****, I can't stop laughing!!!! Ahahahahahhahahahah![]()
AIM: RuinerTT
2005 Nissan Pathfinder LE
					
						
					
						
					
						
					
						
					
						
					
						
					
						
					
						
					
						
					
				
			
			
			
				1. your comment has no point. 2. if you cant shoot someone in the leg w/ a gun for defense you need alot more training and target practice. 3. Glad you got a laugh at it because you made no sense.
					
						
					
						
					
						
					
						
					
						
					
						
					
						
					
						
					
						
					
						
					
				
			
			
			
				you are retarded just shut the **** up.Originally Posted by Greddypacked
-IA MGMT is inappropriate.
i was kinda thinkin the same idea.....Originally Posted by Leadfoot_mf
i dont see a problem with killing someone who was obviously committing a serious crime. regardless whether its his property or not. would I shoot someone in a parking lot who was trying to seal someones car, if the vehicle was occupied, yes. what ever happened to being able to help protect your community and help other people and possibly save their lives?
EF SQUAD FTMFW!!!!![]()