And just this smiley right here......------->
Describes society's view on gayness
And just this smiley right here......------->
Describes society's view on gayness
no its not true being as science has shown there is genetic proof that being gay is genetic thus not being a choice
Wrong! Pulled from the national association for research and thearpy of homsexualityOriginally Posted by Dudeman
Researchers' public statements to the press are often grand and far-reaching. But when answering the scientific community, they speak much more cautiously.
"Gay gene" researcher Dean Hamer was asked by Scientific American if homosexuality was rooted solely in biology. He replied:
"Absolutely not. From twin studies, we already know that half or more of the variability in sexual orientation is not inherited. Our studies try to pinpoint the genetic factors...not negate the psychosocial factors."{4}
http://www.narth.com/docs/istheregene.html
read it.
quoting that as truth is like me quoting the KKK's website for reasons why ethnic crime is on the rise in certain areas. try this website http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/4215427.stm it states that there is no single gene but rather a sequence of similar ones, its not concrete proof but it certainly is more concrete than religion.
Dude that wasn't pulled from a regious website...i pulled it from
national association for research and thearpy of homsexuality
thats true to some point
faggot scientists will start doing that artificial insemenation and shit
<< example
but that sure does take from the nature of things...
also to add to my statement about the website posted all the information on there is old, look at the bibliographic information at the bottom. so not only is it an anti gay website (see their studies and how they all are trying to reorient them to straight) but its studies are dated.
first off LOLthats true to some point
faggot scientists will start doing that artificial insemenation and shit
but that sure does take from the nature of things...
secondly artificial insemination is widely used right now by straight people that are having a problems with conception. in fact statistics say that lesbians adopt far more than are artificially inseminated. and you cant artificially inseminate a guy, i dont care what arnold schwartzenegger did, so they also adopt.
hrm.... doesnt make sense considering
SODOMY IS A CRIME IN GA
I went to your website and pulled this...
"Our study helps to establish that genes play an important role in determining whether a man is gay or heterosexual," he said, but added that other factors were also important.
Writing in the journal Human Genetics, they said environmental factors are also likely to be involved.
"Sexual orientation is a complex trait. There is no one 'gay' gene.
"Our best guess is that multiple genes, potentially interacting with environmental influences, explain differences in sexual orientation." "Our study helps to establish that genes play an important role in determining whether a man is gay or heterosexual," he said, but added that other factors were also important.
"
so you see, most of the time gay people turn gay is because of there "environment" which could be the people you associate yourself with or what happens to you in your life.
as i stated in my post not one genes but several factors. its ok you dont need to admit being wrong i dont wanna change your mind just present facts.
dudeman, are you gay?
*note if you give the incorrect answer, you will be banned/gang raped by men of shaquile o neal size
ok so lets think about this, my friend raised christian, tried to date girls in school, ends up being gay. his brother who im also friends with raised the same way is straight. i hang out with both of them, i wasnt raised christian, and im straight. he was in fact raised in what many people say would be "better" than i was simply because of religion blah blah but he ended up gay. explain that one? one day he said wow im going to risk people hating me and being discriminated against just so i wont be some regular white dude? everything youre saying is a cop out.
FAGG0TIZM IS 0 PERCENT NATURE 100% NURTURE... IT IS A DISEASE... Nothing that a good ol' ass whooping and titty bar can't fix... some are worse than others.
Think about it... fags are social outcasts, make it much harder for them in almost every facet of their infidel assfucking lives. Not only social outcasts, but statistically are the population group outside of Africa with the highest percentage of new HIV infections..... This MEANS THAT the motherfuckers are diseasing the world...
and no the fact that they are shun from society is not the fault of society.... It is their fault.... It has been like that for thousands of years. We need to start burning them again
I understand man and i also present you facts as to why it's a choice in most cases to be gay. I really don't hate all gay people but i just don't understand or agree with the decisions they make but to each his own....
This whole gay subject is something that will always be debated and viewed upon all of society across the world. Some may think it's right but the majority of the people around the world think it's wrong...Majority rules in most cases but in the same sense majority has been proven wrong at times....
I guess it all depends on your religon, how your raised, and the people you associate yourself with that determines your view on homosexuality
LIRL
You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to RaNdomGuy again
ive yet to meat a gay person like the one you are describing. and with your logic we should burn africans too?
please explain...
You've never met an asspirate who faces problems in various social situations ie, meeting new people, bc of society's collective thoughts on homosexuality? ie; getting a new job, parties
Homos are people who's self esteem hits rock bottom and they turn over to gain a new type of self esteem in their own little cult of followers is far easier to attain. They mask their insecurities in their flamboyant behavior... feeding off of attention, to impress their fellow anal-dwelling companions.
ewwww you want to meat a gay person LIRL
AHAAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA
ill change my response, by that description ive only met one ever and ive met quite a few gay people. that is a stereotype, much like any group has a stereotype. ill say the majority of gay people ive met were normal besides their orientation and being a little more butch (girls) or being a little more feminine (guys).
dudeman... you seem to be avoiding my question. are you homosexual. I mean theres absolutely nothing wrong with it. We wont treat you any different, We're all people.
so... are you?
lol@typos
its called a Freudian slip
ive answered it several times, not directly to you but in other posts. its no prob with asking but i am straight.
ORLY? actually something of that nature was not in my subconscious.
ok so can I ask you a hypothetical question, its a 2 option question meaning its one or the other, You must answer it honestly and keep your morals/ etc in mind, and try not to exploit any loopholes just take it for what it is A or B, This is a serious question and will give insight on the situation at hand. Will you answer honestly?
sure
ok...
So you have to choose one of the following options. A or B, no C no pleading the fifth , no nothing.. .Just A or B, no stipulations on ur answer just a 1 letter answer. OK?
Ok now which one of the following activities would you participate in?
A) Letting Shaquile O'Neal anally deflower you without any sort of lube (2 hours and 9 minutes of pounding).
or
B) Would you pound Shaquile O'Neal's rectum given a medication-induced boner if needed, with lube, the catch is you get AIDS shortly thereafter (30 minutes).
answer a letter and give your reasoning why, I will interpret the results afterwards
BWHAHAHAH
rofl thats almost as bad as the old "does your mom know your gay?"
im going with a big neither, because i would rather bang bea arthur than a guy.
wtf? you agreed... its not a trick question... I'm just wondering morally which one would be the less of the two evils for you? (theres a reason connotation behind it, answer honestly)
for those who dont know Bea Arthur-
no way man whats the reasoning between choosing to be the catcher or thrower?
nah its not so clear cut as that... i'll show you the interpretation afterwards... it has more to do with morals and mindset than anything else... Its not as homo as it appears... Just pick one of the two scenarios... not meaning it will actually come true or nothing just which one you'd pick if you were forced to pick one... basically the lesser of two evils if you may
~peaks in~
GAY!
~runs away~
Val for President
anwser the question!
nah and dont try to justify your answer or nothing just A or B... ya know its to prove a point you'll see.
in PMslol wtf it has nothing to do with your sexuality... its a question about morality... What are you afraid it will reveal? its not misleading or nothing just make a post with either of the letters that you'd feel is the lesser of the two evils... And we can break down the analytical process in your mind... I'll show you where this is going and it will prove a good point... trust meno that is really rediculous, i dont jump on the bandwagon so my sexuality is put on trial?
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
