Mel Watt promoted by Obama

[Sinfix_15]

Newest promotion handed out by Obama. There seems to be a trend with Obama's selection process, but i cant quite put my finger on it just yet.

Mel Watt: Majority of whites won't vote for black candidate | The Daily Caller

[Vteckidd]

This guy is a race pimp, a slug, a slimeball.

I love the racist black position that you solve claimed segregation by...................segregation.

idiots

[Sinfix_15]

This guy is a race pimp, a slug, a slimeball.

I love the racist black position that you solve claimed segregation by...................segregation.

idiots

The type of man the Obama administration wants.

[Vteckidd]

He has a history of hiring black supremacists/ extreme radicals

[RandomGuy]

ooor a pointless talking point created to spawn even more useless news headlines/ media discussions /etc...

I think there's a LOT more serious stuff going on

[Vteckidd]

Obama doesn't vet people well who he hires oR appoints.

I mean i won't lose sleep ofver this, but as a white male I'm kinda tired of being called a racist .

[Sinfix_15]

Obama doesn't vet people well who he hires oR appoints.

I mean i won't lose sleep ofver this, but as a white male I'm kinda tired of being called a racist .

Being anti-white has become politically correct. As a white person, if you're not actively promoting the eradication of your own race, you're a racist.

[.blank cd]

If a white candidate said "most black people wouldn't vote for a white candidate"

There would be outrage and racism charges. Its the double standard we live in

There wouldn't be outrage. It would just be incorrect. Black people have voted for white candidates since black people were allowed to vote. No one would ever say that.

Being anti-white has become politically correct. As a white person, if you're not actively promoting the eradication of your own race, you're a racist.

Thank you, Derek Vinyard.

[Vteckidd]

There wouldn't be outrage. It would just be incorrect. Black people have voted for white candidates since black people were allowed to vote. No one would ever say that.

This guy is also, "incorrect". Isnt that pretty much what Romney said in 2012? "There is a certain section of the voting population who depend on the govt and wont vote for me". he never even MENTIONED race yet was called racist.

Why make broad, inherently WRONG generalizations?

I disagree, if a GOP person was nominated for something and the left dug up a soundbite where he said that, it would be headline news. What he said doesnt bother me, its that The president of the united states feels that someone with this point of view (which is divisive and racially charged) is fit to serve in a high ranking position.

But, Obama has never had the best judgement

[.blank cd]

This guy is also, "incorrect". Isnt that pretty much what Romney said in 2012? "There is a certain section of the voting population who depend on the govt and wont vote for me". he never even MENTIONED race yet was called racist.

Why make broad, inherently WRONG generalizations?

It may not be a majority of whites, but there's still some voters who will not vote for a black candidate. That's a fact. And it may be more sizable than some will admit.

I disagree, if a GOP person was nominated for something and the left dug up a soundbite where he said that, it would be headline news. What he said doesnt bother me, its that The president of the united states feels that someone with this point of view (which is divisive and racially charged) is fit to serve in a high ranking position.

You believe acknowledging that racism still exists, which it does, is racially divisive?

[Sinfix_15]

There wouldn't be outrage. It would just be incorrect. Black people have voted for white candidates since black people were allowed to vote. No one would ever say that.

You like statistics.... let's put statistics to work on evaluating the racial bias between voters in elections..... i think the statistics will not only show the opposite to be true, but also make Watt's comments appear asinine.

Thank you, Derek Vinyard.

Ed Norton is a great actor.

[.blank cd]

Obama doesn't vet people well who he hires oR appoints.

I mean i won't lose sleep ofver this, but as a white male I'm kinda tired of being called a racist .

So Obama said he didnt vet this guy? Or do you think that what you believe extreme radicalism and supremacism is isn't actually extreme radicalism or supremacism at all?

[Vteckidd]

So Obama said he didnt vet this guy? Or do you think that what you believe extreme radicalism and supremacism is isn't actually extreme radicalism or supremacism at all?

You wont agree with me no matter what I say, its just philosophically different.

I dont think its good for a sitting president to nominate someone to a position of power that has views like this. Why? The same reason why you guys bashed Romney for saying what he said. Its below the office of the presidency. Leaders are to unite, and lead. Not divide and conquer, which is increasingly what i see from washington (notice i said washington not Obama).

Obama has not lead, and he has not brought anyone together. he campaigns, he divides, he conquers. he did it with the govt shutdown, the healthcare law, the elections, foreign policy, the IRS scandal, its all there. If a GOP President had nominated someone that had these types of views it would be headline news.

Does racism exist? yes. Do race pimps like Watt who use it for their own personal gain take advantage of the stereotypes to perpetuate this "you cant succeed because white america is holding you back" notion disgust me? yup.

We have a black president, who has won 2 elections, by decent margins. What has HE done to further the black cause? nothing, hes made it worse. The real racists are the race hustlers like watt, sharpton, etc.

[Vteckidd]

If a white candidate said "most black people wouldn't vote for a white candidate"

There would be outrage and racism charges. Its the double standard we live in

[Sinfix_15]

It's white people who are the ones making everything a racial issue and injecting race into everything......

[.blank cd]

There were 19 pseudo-pilots who thought flying a couple passenger jetliners into some buildings that might take some contention with your cavalier use of the words "extreme radicalism"

[Vteckidd]

There were 19 pseudo-pilots who thought flying a couple passenger jetliners into some buildings that might take some contention with your cavalier use of the words "extreme radicalism"

not going to even dignify this strawman with a comment.

[.blank cd]

not going to even dignify this strawman with a comment.

You said Mel Watts was an extreme radical, did you not? If so, then not a straw man.

There are extreme radicals, and what you believe an extreme radical is. For some reason, they're different. They shouldn't be

[Sinfix_15]

You said Mel Watts was an extreme radical, did you not? If so, then not a straw man.

There are extreme radicals, and what you believe an extreme radical is. For some reason, they're different. They shouldn't be

Thinking white people shouldnt be allowed to vote based on a fabricated false perception of racism is pretty radical. Him being promoted could be mistaken for institutionalizing racism, especially when you combine it with Obama's other allstars. Funny.... a democrat, who is vocal about accusing republicans of trying to restrict black people from voting would make a comment like this. Sounds like black leaders have no issues with racism, as long as it's in the right direction.





Here we go again...... with Blank defending the indefensible.

The most annoying thing about you is how your principles shift based on the people involved.

[Vteckidd]

You said Mel Watts was an extreme radical, did you not? If so, then not a straw man.

There are extreme radicals, and what you believe an extreme radical is. For some reason, they're different. They shouldn't be

not true, i didnt say that.

I said "He has a history of hiring black supremacists/ extreme radicals "


did i say that Watts was an extreme radical? reading is fundamental.

Also, like i said, i cannot debate this with you, if you are going to tell me what a radical is and isnt, and use only your own opinion as the basis to make that determination.

[Sinfix_15]

[Vteckidd]

Can't debate with someone who tells you what you think and uses his own feelings and opinions as the basis for fact.

Won't get sucked into another 10 page thread where we debate everything but the topic

[.blank cd]

Can't debate with someone who tells you what you think and uses his own feelings and opinions as the basis for fact.

Won't get sucked into another 10 page thread where we debate everything but the topic

You don't have to debate it with me. I'm not really saying anything that is debatable. I understand you like to use hyperbole to make a point, but I, myself, try not to make a habit of changing words in the dictionary to suit my ideology.

It's perfectly fine if you think an extreme radicalist is just someone who has a different opinion than you. But I'm just saying that your definition of radicalism and the dictionary definition of radicalism are COMPLETELY different. And I'm gonna have to go with the dictionary definition, if that's ok with you.

The topic was Mel Watt, whom you tacitly implied was an extreme radical. You are wrong. You may disagree with something he says, but he's not an extreme radical. That's all I'm saying. I'm not debating dictionary definitions of words. They are what they are.

[Browning151]

LOL

[.blank cd]

You just don't get to make up what someone says to suit your agenda. That's not how it works.

[Sinfix_15]

You just don't get to make up what someone says to suit your agenda. That's not how it works.

Nobody is making up what he said......

We just dont view these democratic radicals with the same rose colored glasses and affection that you do. These people are your heroes..... you know how they say "love is blind"

[Sinfix_15]

In a theoretical scenario where we could eliminate people who were voting based on race.......



Mitt Romney would be president right now.

[Sinfix_15]

ooooo..... i know, let's let the IRS decide who should and shouldnt vote.........

[Vteckidd]

LOL so basically, you dodged, go figure.

Being racist isnt illegal. Neither is being a communist. So, if you want to make this policy

Racially motivated voters should be adjusted for, yes.

How do you suggest they be "adjusted" for? Not counted? Counted Less? maybe a 3/5ths law?

HMMMMM SOUNDS FAMILIAR, WHERE HAVE I HEARD THIS BEFORE:

The Three-Fifths Compromise was a compromise between Southern and Northern states reached during the Philadelphia Convention of 1787 in which three-fifths of the enumerated population of slaves would be counted for representation purposes regarding both the distribution of taxes and the apportionment of the members of the United States House of Representatives. It was proposed by delegates James Wilson and Roger Sherman.

Lets solve racism by being bigots and racist.

[.blank cd]

LOL so basically, you dodged, go figure.

Didnt dodge at all. All three of you jumped to a conclusion before all the facts were presented. I figured this would happen. That's why I've said what I've said.

How do you suggest they be "adjusted" for? Not counted? Counted Less? maybe a 3/5ths law?

HMMMMM SOUNDS FAMILIAR, WHERE HAVE I HEARD THIS BEFORE:


Lets solve racism by being bigots and racist.

Not like the 3/5ths law. Actually nothing like it. Actually the 3/5ths law has absolutely nothing to do with what I'm talking about. I'm not talking about solving racism either.

[Vteckidd]

Still not answering, how would you implement this:

Racially motivated voters should be adjusted for, yes.

lets hear some ideas, since you suggested it

[Sinfix_15]

What truly befuddles me is how liberals are so willing to give the government the perfect tyrannical vehicle as long as in that moment, the government is on their side. Every time the public shifts towards liberalism, it's like open season for the government to power reach.

When blank opens up and speaks freely, you start to understand how radical leftist views are........

[Sinfix_15]

Just for clarification, if a black person attacks me and i shoot them, is that a racially motivated crime?

[.blank cd]

hmm..... i thought that was the way it worked. Every time a black person gets killed by a white person it is racially motivated. You know.... the 1 time per 30 that a white person kills a black person.

Simply happenstance. There are more white people than black people. If I'm not mistaken, the general population is about 30:1

Just for clarification, if a black person attacks me and i shoot them, is that a racially motivated crime?

Nope.

[Vteckidd]

Just for clarification, if a black person attacks me and i shoot them, is that a racially motivated crime?

in for 10 pages of GUN CONTROL debate.

Seriously, hes cornered and he knows it, stick to the topic.

He said that racially motivated voters should be ADJUSTED for, i want to hear HOW he plans for that to happen, and what he thinks should be done.

[.blank cd]

in for 10 pages of GUN CONTROL debate.

Seriously, hes cornered and he knows it, stick to the topic.

He said that racially motivated voters should be ADJUSTED for, i want to hear HOW he plans for that to happen, and what he thinks should be done.

I already answered this. It's baffling that you haven't put 2 and 2 together

On second thought it really isn't.

And cornered? No. Lol. This conversation is going exactly the way I wanted it.

[Browning151]

And cornered? No. Lol. This conversation is going exactly the way I wanted it.

Derailed, with you side stepping every direct question aimed at you? Yep, sounds about right.

[Vteckidd]

I already answered this. It's baffling that you haven't put 2 and 2 together

On second thought it really isn't.

I must have missed it (mainly because you are just being dishonest now). Here, should be easy for you to answer right now, i made it bolded and big for you to see. I want you to expand on comments you made, how would you ADJUST for these racially motivated voters?

Racially motivated voters should be adjusted for, yes.

[Sinfix_15]

So the government should be able to legislate our thoughts. If i dont like black people, i shouldnt be allowed to vote?

[.blank cd]

Nope. Fielded every question that's been asked.

Unless sidestepping means not hand delivering the answers you want to hear.