Its a bogus question. You would know that if you had a degree in psychology.Quote:
Originally Posted by .blank cd
Cars and drivers are not limited to being used at full ability, nor have to be used at all.
Printable View
Its a bogus question. You would know that if you had a degree in psychology.Quote:
Originally Posted by .blank cd
Cars and drivers are not limited to being used at full ability, nor have to be used at all.
Theyre already well aware.Quote:
Originally Posted by bu villain
Because you or Sinfix haven't really demonstrated this yet. The reality is even after an assault weapons ban, you'll still be able to purchase an assault weapon. I don't understand how people believe you won't be able to. It's baffling my mind right now.Quote:
Originally Posted by David88vert
He is delusional.Quote:
Originally Posted by David88vert
Quote:
Originally Posted by .blank cd
I never claimed that you would no longer be able to buy an assault weapon at all. You make these ridiculous assumptions on your own, so you are confusing yourself. Im trying to help you understand reality.
We should never legalize weed, since banning it and spending billions of dollars to prevent it's use hasnt stopped people from using it. People who risk legal punishment to acquire weed should take comfort in knowing that even though weed is illegal, the government isnt competent enough to enforce the law.Quote:
Originally Posted by .blank cd
You are baffling my mind right now.
1. its not a bogus question. I agree its not a great idea for everyone to be able to drive a Vette. Some people can not handle its capability, or the consequences that come with the capability. Mentally or physically.Quote:
Originally Posted by David88vert
2. I haven't said at all that they are limited to being used at full capacity. The available capability is there from the second you purchase it, so we must assume that the cars full capability is available to everyone that purchases one.
What are some ways we already employ to restrict people from purchasing cars with high capabilities, policy or otherwise?
There is more than a ban in place when it comes to weed. You know this. You can't compare the two. Sorry.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sinfix_15
If you get caught going over 30 mph over the speed limit, it doesn't matter what type of car you are in, or if you are at the limit of the cars abilities.Quote:
Originally Posted by .blank cd
Sure you can. Weed is illegal but that hasn't done anything to keep people from buying it, using it, or growing it. These people still choose to be criminals.Quote:
Originally Posted by .blank cd
Guns would be no different.
Ok. You can get a speeding ticket. That is a reactive solution to really powerful cars. What are some proactive methods we use to stop people from committing crimes in very capable cars?Quote:
Originally Posted by David88vert
Quote:
Originally Posted by .blank cd
You can't assume that people will just incorrectly use it though.
Yes, weed is illegal, and people who use it are choosing to be criminals. Can you tell me how weed is different than guns?Quote:
Originally Posted by David88vert
So your argument is that we shouldnt care if assault weapons are banned because we can still acquire them illegally?Quote:
Originally Posted by .blank cd
do you realize how fucking stupid that is?
Again. I am not assuming all people are going to use it incorrectly. I am assuming that in any given high end sports car, that the cars full capabilities are available to anyone that purchases one. Is that incorrect?Quote:
Originally Posted by David88vert
Driving is a priviledge, not a Constitutional right.Quote:
Originally Posted by .blank cd
For 30 over, you usually will have your license suspended and a monetary fine. You can easily spend some time in jail if the officer chooses to arrest you as well.
We do not force throttle or speed limiters on cars to limit them to the speed limit. People are expected to know to be responsible.
Let me be clear... No system is going to be perfect.Quote:
Originally Posted by David88vert
But, I..I..I.I.I.I.III...I know, if Congress will get serious about this. We can all agree on a balanced approach.
I'm not even comparing weed to guns at all! Lol.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sinfix_15
Jump jump jump jump jump jump jump jump. Conclusions'll make ya....
Sure. Weed hampers your judgment when you are in an altered state. Guns don't enter your body and do that. Perhaps you are on an altered state as you don't seem to understand something so simple.Quote:
Originally Posted by .blank cd
Congress is getting serious about denying the over reaches of the radical left that are in an effort to strip us of our constitutional rights. Thankfully there's people like Ted Cruz and Rand Paul.......Quote:
Originally Posted by Echonova
You must have bought a slow car, like a Civic, if you are asking this question.Quote:
Originally Posted by .blank cd
What are some proactive methods we already employ to limit the number of crimes committed with cars, policy or otherwise?Quote:
Originally Posted by David88vert
You keep saying that we should learn from you but when we do learn to just jump to conclusions like you do, then you complain. Make up your mind.....Quote:
Originally Posted by .blank cd
Can you or can you not buy a GTR straight off the dealership lot and do 0-60 in under 4 seconds, yes or no? I don't know how I could make that any simpler.Quote:
Originally Posted by David88vert
We do not outlaw/ban any cars based upon their capability to be used illegally. Stay on course.Quote:
Originally Posted by .blank cd
I haven't come to a conclusion yet because the subject keeps getting derailed by stupid comparisons to weed.Quote:
Originally Posted by David88vert
I can't afford a GTR and I am not a C&D or R&T driver, so no.Quote:
Originally Posted by .blank cd
Maybe that means you need to smoke some?Quote:
Originally Posted by .blank cd
This is false, and i am on course. Sinfix wants an analogy to high powered cars.Quote:
Originally Posted by David88vert
So again the question is, what methods, policy or otherwise, do we use to limit people purchasing and using high powered cars?
None..... punish people who speed, not for having cars capable of speeding.Quote:
Originally Posted by .blank cd
No one is punished for having a car capable of speeding, and everyone is already punished for speedingQuote:
Originally Posted by Sinfix_15
What is a way we already control who gets highly capable cars?
Give me a list of cars that we are not allowed to purchase based on their ability to go in excess of 70mph.Quote:
Originally Posted by .blank cd
Define highly capable car.Quote:
Originally Posted by .blank cd
Sinfix said corvette. So anything north of that. Vette's, lambos, Ferrari's, GTR's.Quote:
Originally Posted by David88vert
Whoa, don't get ahead of yourself. I said "limit"....Quote:
Originally Posted by David88vert
Obama stand in front of the cameras with a group of drunk driving victims and says " these poor kids were slaughtered by a corvette owner..... people dont need to have cars as capable as a corvette..... these poor kids didnt stand a chance of moving out of the corvettes way...... if we can save one life, then we have to try..... i support banning corvettes...... we deserve a vote....... these kids deserve a vote........ atlanta deserves a vote...... newyork deserves a vote"Quote:
Originally Posted by .blank cd
Banning corvettes is punishment to everyone who owns and enjoys them responsibly, its also punishment to the manufacturers or corvettes.....
What about Honda Accords? They go way over the speed limit. In fact, what cars do we have that CAN'T go over the speed limit?Quote:
Originally Posted by .blank cd
I'm just keeping it on course with the gun discussion. Give me a list.Quote:
Originally Posted by .blank cd
Speed limits.....Quote:
Originally Posted by .blank cd
there, im playing this game. Make your point so it can be easily refuted.