Know what you are voting for : Simple Breakdown.

[Tiff-O-Bitties]

http://www.afa.net/08VG/index.html

http://www.afa.net/pdfs/08vg_print.pdf

Also, Georgia's early voting info... look for your county and you can vote in the weeks before Nov. 4

http://www.sos.georgia.gov/elections...arlyvoting.pdf

[BobbyFresco]

Way to post info from an impartial, non partisan website. / sarcasm.

[Tiff-O-Bitties]

Way to post info from an impartial, non partisan website. / sarcasm.

You need to get the fucc off my ass... You've done it twice now.. Chill out.

[BobbyFresco]

You need to get the fucc off my ass... You've done it twice now.. Chill out.

Who are you again?
Sorry that I don't kiss your ass like every other thirsty mf'er on here. My bad.
It's my opinion on this thread; Don't like it or me, use the ignore function. You've been here long enough so you should know how to use it.

[Tiff-O-Bitties]

Who are you again?
Sorry that I don't kiss your ass like every other thirsty mf'er on here. My bad.
It's my opinion on this thread; Don't like it or me, use the ignore function. You've been here long enough so you should know how to use it.

I could ask you the same...

I do not want anyone kissing my ass. Thanks.

so you admit what you posted was BIAS ?

that is about as bad as Jaime using CBN as his source for political arguments

I wasn't being bias, just posting some information that was posted on the AFA website.

[4dmin]

You need to get the fucc off my ass... You've done it twice now.. Chill out.

so you admit what you posted was BIAS ?

that is about as bad as Jaime using CBN as his source for political arguments

[BobbyFresco]

so you admit what you posted was BIAS ?

LMMFAO....

[NevrNufTorq]

so you admit what you posted was BIAS ?

that is about as bad as Jaime using CBN as his source for political arguments

no offens bro, but thats like saying anything you post isnt a running ad for obama!!! same said for mine an ad for mccain

i dont care either way, just saying

[4dmin]

no offens bro, but thats like saying anything you post isnt a running ad for obama!!! same said for mine an ad for mccain

i dont care either way, just saying

that is incorrect sir i offer my opinions w/ FACTS... you can hardly call what was posted credible. that is like using US Weekly as your news source to choose your candidate. the link to bias information focused on primary two things which i'm not surprised considering the source that Obama loves HOMOs and wants to KILL babies the fashion of people that believe such sh!t are voting republican anyway we are just stating the obvious.

[Jaimecbr900]

so you admit what you posted was BIAS ?

that is about as bad as Jaime using CBN as his source for political arguments

It is no different than you guys using CNN, ABC, NBC, etc as a reliable "unbiased" source. What exactly constitutes, in yall's book, as a "reliable" enough source to become a "fact"? Maybe if God himself says that Obama sucks some of yall will believe it? Well, God told me himself he does, now what? Wait, most of yall don't BELIEVE there is a God either, so that won't work, huh? See the point?

BTW, you still didn't disprove any of what I said in the other thread about sex ed and Obama. I'm sure IF he actually DIDN'T say what I QUOTED him saying, then it should be rather easy, since 90% of all media are Obama lovers, to find "facts" to prove me wrong.

So maybe the source is not as "unreliable" as you guys WANT it to be, huh?

[Vteckidd]

It is no different than you guys using CNN, ABC, NBC, etc as a reliable "unbiased" source. What exactly constitutes, in yall's book, as a "reliable" enough source to become a "fact"? Maybe if God himself says that Obama sucks some of yall will believe it? Well, God told me himself he does, now what? Wait, most of yall don't BELIEVE there is a God either, so that won't work, huh? See the point?

BTW, you still didn't disprove any of what I said in the other thread about sex ed and Obama. I'm sure IF he actually DIDN'T say what I QUOTED him saying, then it should be rather easy, since 90% of all media are Obama lovers, to find "facts" to prove me wrong.

So maybe the source is not as "unreliable" as you guys WANT it to be, huh?

How come when i try to make a point as eloquent as this, it ends up being some rehashed garbage.

CHeers to Jaime, the man who can type what im thinking LOL

[4dmin]

It is no different than you guys using CNN, ABC, NBC, etc as a reliable "unbiased" source. What exactly constitutes, in yall's book, as a "reliable" enough source to become a "fact"? Maybe if God himself says that Obama sucks some of yall will believe it? Well, God told me himself he does, now what? Wait, most of yall don't BELIEVE there is a God either, so that won't work, huh? See the point?

BTW, you still didn't disprove any of what I said in the other thread about sex ed and Obama. I'm sure IF he actually DIDN'T say what I QUOTED him saying, then it should be rather easy, since 90% of all media are Obama lovers, to find "facts" to prove me wrong.

So maybe the source is not as "unreliable" as you guys WANT it to be, huh?

no i dont' see your point b/c your mixing up FACTS and BIAS literature... i totally disproved what you said and you could never state evidence. i have record of me asking at least 3x where was this "evidence OBAMA gave to the media that was his curriculum" which you were quoted saying he sent it to "MSNBC" which you could never pull up... so you gave me your CBN article which isn't biased... i mean look at the founder of CBN and what they stand for

so where is it? where is the evidence that his curriculum was to teach K grade all you listed? you said he gave it to MSNBC prove it.

-a quote from the article itself, "Mr. Obama stated that he understood the main objective of the legislation, as it pertained to kindergarteners, to be to teach them how to defend themselves against sexual predators." this is TOTALLY DIFFERENT THAN PREVENTING TEEN PREGNANCY....THE BASIS OF YOUR ARGUMENT.

^ this is another point

[Mike Lowrey]

so you admit what you posted was BIAS ?

that is about as bad as Jaime using CBN as his source for political arguments

Like you using the liberal media as your sources?.....

[Vteckidd]

Way to post info from an impartial, non partisan website. / sarcasm.

pot calling kettle, hey your black

[BobbyFresco]

pot calling kettle, hey your black

That's a keen observation on your part. Great Job! *high five*

[BobbyFresco]

There's no disputing that the source the OP used is biased. The name of the "organization" is a dead give away.

[Vteckidd]

There's no disputing that the source the OP used is biased. The name of the "organization" is a dead give away.

its no more bias than CNN on a wed afternooon

[4dmin]

its no more bias than CNN on a wed afternooon

what !?! i'm not even going to justify w/ an answer



^ yup thats my source for voting

[BobbyFresco]

its no more bias than CNN on a wed afternooon

I guess maybe the sourced site gets their "info" from Fox News.

[Vteckidd]

I guess maybe the sourced site gets their "info" from Fox News.

FOX is more unbiased than CNN sorry pal

I bet you love MSNBC too

[4dmin]

FOX is more unbiased than CNN sorry pal

I bet you love MSNBC too

um sorry but cnn is probably least bias of ABC/FOX/CNN... denying that shows your thought process.

Fox is so far up republican asses it's ridiculous. I watch it every morning to see what is going on w/ McCain/Palin. For a station to have created some of the most controversial shows over the years they have the most conservative viewers for news. funny how that works

[DeutscheBAG!]

FOX is more unbiased than CNN sorry pal

you owe me a new monitor..i just spit water all over it

[NevrNufTorq]

funny this turned into this, and like i said paul, what you post is an ad for your guy and my posts an ad for mine...


if most of this post doesnt prove it i dont know what does, what i find 'credible' you dont and vice versa so how do 'your facts' become anymore credible than mine? just asking since we both know who we want in and are 'grownups' about it...just imho

[4dmin]

funny this turned into this, and like i said paul, what you post is an ad for your guy and my posts an ad for mine...


if most of this post doesnt prove it i dont know what does, what i find 'credible' you dont and vice versa so how do 'your facts' become anymore credible than mine? just asking since we both know who we want in and are 'grownups' about it...just imho

i'm being a smartass posting pix to show the point you obviously missed... your trying to say my post are bias b/c i stated the obvious that her source was very bias... come'on did you even read the source or see how it was presented? probably not.

like i said people want to talk sh!t about candidates w/o backing sh!t up... Joe made a great post about tax plans after i started one that didn't get anywhere... it doesn't matter how BOLD or FACT something is some people are just blind to the truth. Christians are perfect example, but hey i'm just biased Democrat registered as Libertarian

[Vteckidd]

You cant be serious that CNN is UNBIASED?

CNN and MSNBC are the MOST LEFT ORGANIZATIONS OUT THERE, might as well be the New York Times.

Fox is Right, but not FAR RIGHT they are pretty conservative.

you do have a few guys that are RIGHT on there, hannity can tend to be far right on some things.

But for the most part the report stuff accurately

[BobbyFresco]

The fact of the matter is that impartial non- partisan sources are few and far in between...That goes for both sides of the fence.

[Vteckidd]

The fact of the matter is that impartial non- partisan sources are few and far in between...That goes for both sides of the fence.

smartest thing you have said all week

[BobbyFresco]

smartest thing you have said all week

I wasn't the civilized individual I am, I'd want to kick you in the throat at least once a week....

[Total_Blender]

This "issues" cited on the checklist are pretty vague. Here's an even scarier one from the primaries:

http://www.afa.net/pdfs/08vg.pdf

"Constitutional protection of marriage between a woman and a man"

Probably refers to "ban gay marriage and benefits for gay partners" legislation.

"Teaching of Homosexuality in Public Schools"

Is something I support. I think that kids should be taught that intolerance against gays, lesbians, transgendered people, and intersexed people is wrong. They should be taught how to acknowledge and accept the queer-ness of others in a safe and non-demeaning way. They should be taught things like proper pronoun use for transgendered and intersexed people, identifying gender stereotypes, how to identify and report hate crimes, etc. This doesn't have to involve technical discussions of butt-secks or whatever. Many straight people engage in butt-secks, therefore including it in safe sex curriculum is really not an issue specific to gays, but that's beside the point.

Some of you will say its the responsibility of the parents to teach this stuff, but look how much hate for gays is on IA. You think these people aren't going to pass that hate on to their kids? Where should homosexual kids/teens turn for information when their own families are intolerant?

The parents can teach whatever "Morals/Religion/etc" they want but LGBT's are a social group with the same rights as everyone else in this country and they have the right to be included in its culture of education.

[Total_Blender]

So it looks like you read about as much of my post as the others read of yours, huh?

I've read every post in this thread. and I have yet to see anyone on the right Wing side of this issue present an original source (i.e. a full-text of legislation, video of a speech or a senate session, congressional voting records, etc) that says what Obama will or won't require taught to grades K through 6.

The "liberal media" as you say might be biased, but when you look at the original sources for their information you can wade through any BIAS pretty effectively, and that goes for all media from CNN to CBN. As long as you recognize what their bias is and seek the original source of their information you can get a pretty good grip on the story. I watch just as much FOX as I watch CNN. Hell, I probably watch more FOX just to get the opposing view.

And it also depends on who you watch, almost every network has their liberals and conservatives. I mean CNN has a 3 hour block of conservatives Glenn Beck and Nancy Grace during prime time. But I have never *ever* seen a liberal commentator/anchor/etc on FOX. You can say Colmes is a liberal, but really? Have you read his books? He basically twists things around to support the conservatives from a liberal stance and makes apologies/excuses for why conservative policies are failing.

[4dmin]

Nancy Grace

man i can't stand her... just how she talks and how the show flips to other commentators... i'm just like when i watch it

[Total_Blender]

man i can't stand her... just how she talks and how the show flips to other commentators... i'm just like when i watch it

Yeah, its hard to watch. The only good parts of her shows are the callers/guests who pwn her all the time.

[tony]

Propaganda: ideas, facts, or allegations spread deliberately to further one's cause or to damage an opposing cause

[Total_Blender]

I just read the plan you posted and I don't see anything in it that implies that a full sex-ed curricula will be taught to grades k-6. Programs listed have K as the beginning grade but it does not say that the full curricula given in kindergarten.

[Tiff-O-Bitties]

So, why did all of this turn into a debate about sex-ed!? WTF!!!!