IS there a such thing?
![]()
IS there a such thing?
![]()
yes....
i spy a ferrari
I think I found Waldo. Hes in the passenger seat of the Chrysler.
lol he must have pawned his striped shirtOriginally Posted by 03RCode
No such thing... I love bimmers, my buddy Meng just got a 330i twin turbo 6speed, gunmetalish (like the middle one in the front row) with the red leather (like the middle one in the front row lol)... SO NICE!
I like pretty much all the cars in that pic though lol
335i not 330i.Originally Posted by Brian*
lol! Equal innnn....braking and cornering? How about interior comfort?Originally Posted by Brian*
Stock for stock I bet I'll outrun a T/A on a road course in an e36 m3/4/5 with passengers and luggage...
As far as I know, f-bodies have been known to do exceptionally well in SCCA runs around here. My buddy's dad has trophies all over his shop from SCCA for first place, and he has a '95 Camaro Z28 with lowering springs and wider wheels. The same friend has a '98 Camaro SS himself with just SLP suspension and a set of wide wheels, and he scares me pretty good in the twisties.Originally Posted by speedminded
Not saying the M3 would lose by any means because that's what they're for, but I don't think F-bodies do as bad as people think.
'92 C2500 6.5 Turbo Diesel | '96 240sx
You're right, i've seen some crazy good times coming from f-bodies at Road Atlanta.Originally Posted by cgEvan
They scare me at 45mph, during normal driving. Hell, they scare me sitting still...they're so uncomfortable and unconventional. The dash is large enough to play a few rounds of golf on and i'm 6'3"+ and still can't see the front of the car, lol! Some people love them though! Are they like the Corvettes where you have to open the doors and hatch before raising them on a lift or jacking them up? lol, way to go GM!
I'm 5'10" and can see perfect with a gangster lean!!Originally Posted by speedminded
lol. I've driven with 17x9(f) 17x11(r) wheels and 15x4(f) 15x8(r) wheels and it seems to still drive well, haven't had a scare yet. I could deal with LS1 brakes though![]()
'92 C2500 6.5 Turbo Diesel | '96 240sx
I do agree about comfort! I rode in one all the way to south Florida and didn't think I was going to be able to walk when I got out lololOriginally Posted by speedminded
andddddd, the dash is hard to see over![]()
F-bodies do well in their own respect because they have ass loads of low end torque, 315's go on like cake all the way around and some fat brakes can easily be bought for dirt cheap. More tire = more contact patch, more grip, more surface to brake and yes, just shit loads of grip. Throw 315's and 300wt at 2500 rpms in any slightly sporty BMW or what not with some fender work and watch what happens. BMW's and other small sports cars like Miata's, Old Porsche's, old Z cars etc. etc are simply amazing because they can keep up with Vette's and other car that run a "similar" tire/wheel set up as a properly set up F body with half the tire, less power, less brakes with such a connected driving experience.Originally Posted by cgEvan
Don't believe me? The new 6.2 liter Camaro has an extremely modern suspension system, much wider tires, bigger brakes, more power and gobs more torque then the current M3, yet lapped the ring about 20 seconds slower and 30 seconds slower then the outgoing E46 CSL. To top it off it's hardly heavier then the E92.
Then again, they were designed to do that....take a BMW dragging and watch what happens, unless big money was spent.
lemme guess...miami?
Canon Nutswinger:
Canon XS
18-55mm
55-250mm
50mm USM
yep.Originally Posted by blacknightteg
i see a aston martin... nice m3s btw
GECKO SQUAD MEMBER
MSS RACING REPRESENTA.....
the saga continues....
Where is the Aston?Originally Posted by Da_unknown
my fault i thought it was
GECKO SQUAD MEMBER
MSS RACING REPRESENTA.....
the saga continues....
That sir, is a Jaguar.Originally Posted by Da_unknown
Oh oh civic anybody?! Nevermind...
That is a good amount of bimmers though.
thats a whole lotta m3s
There's gotta be a 911 in that row up there.
And lol @ the Chrysler trying to blend in.
BUY MY HATCH <--click the link, cuz.
lol didnt even notice the audi dealership at first
i love me some e92's
You know....that's why i'd rather have the upcoming RS5. Classier, rarer, better looking, and faster 99% of the time on the street but no where near as rewarding on the track, and probably not as fast (we will see).
Still love my M/// car though.
I see a red Ford Taurus.
I guess i missed a E36 vs Trans Am debate.
I wonder who'd win that?
![]()
Good thing that's not all E36 M3s, it'd be a whole bunch of ugly![]()
'92 C2500 6.5 Turbo Diesel | '96 240sx
Says the guy with one of the most plasticy, glued together and rental-esque muscle cars ever made. Or lack there-of muscle...Originally Posted by cgEvan
Don't get me started on the emo-hatch.
Originally Posted by OnURleft
You never said anything about it looking ugly![]()
'92 C2500 6.5 Turbo Diesel | '96 240sx
Rental carOriginally Posted by cgEvan
Plasticy
Glued together
the words speak for themselves. Keep blacking it out to hide the lines and the B-A functional hood scoops.
I am aware you sold the Emo-mobile. That doesn't mean you didn't drive it around....lololololoHatch? What hatch? I don't have a hatch. lolol![]()
Better looking car than an E36, NutswingerOriginally Posted by OnURleft
![]()
The car had graffiti on it, last I checked, that wasn't emo... nor was anything about the carI am aware you sold the Emo-mobile. That doesn't mean you didn't drive it around.You kind of sound stupid.
'92 C2500 6.5 Turbo Diesel | '96 240sx
Hatch? What hatch? I don't have a hatch. lololOriginally Posted by OnURleft
'92 C2500 6.5 Turbo Diesel | '96 240sx
Stop fucking editting your posts. Either type or don't, fuck.
'92 C2500 6.5 Turbo Diesel | '96 240sx
here we have both non-top of the line cars in question, both have non-factory wheels.
NOT seeing it.
'92 C2500 6.5 Turbo Diesel | '96 240sx
Originally Posted by cgEvan
Read the title of the thread emo-boy.
I was making a joke to the OP when you got butt hurt and had to post your 2 cents that wasn't asked for. No one said ANYTHING about my cars until you did, so maybe YOU should read the title of the thread, dumbfuck.Originally Posted by OnURleft
'92 C2500 6.5 Turbo Diesel | '96 240sx
Originally Posted by cgEvan
Butt hurt? You amused me and I laughed? It was funny because you are driving a car of a brand who struggled with design in the 90's heavily. I don't even want to start with your previous car.
I don't care, most modded E36 M3's are ugly. Few are clean except for the relatively stock ones and tastefully modded ones that don't seem to exist much anymore. The cars are swormed with replica mods and bargain bullshit parts these days and are quite "ricer-esque" if you ask me.