Post a picture of your PRACTICAL dream car (that you could afford by 2010)

[DoriDori]

i mean, this is ok too, but i dont like the blue, i dont know what it is, some kind of japanese super car the guy says, whatever that means, $50,000 shipped thou.
Nissan SKYLINE used

Stock No: 1955
On Order
Export size: 10.33 m3 Price: USD 49,200 FOB Price: USD 49,700
Special Notes:4WD,DOHC,TURBO Nissan SKYLINE GTR general characteristics First registration
(year/month) 1999 / N/A Manufacture date
(year/month) 1999 / N/A Grade GTR Type -8B5234W- Engine type RB26 Dispalcement 2600 cc Transmission Manual Turbo Yes Fuel Petrol Drive 4WD Capacity 4 passengers Steering Wheel Right Color blue metalic Mileage 84000 km Chassis No:
Vehicle Type coupe Condition And Damage of Nissan SKYLINE JP Rating N/A Condition used Driving Condition drivable Engine Start start Damage used Interior Condition B Repaired no Location, Registration and Inspection of Nissan SKYLINE Location: Nagoya, De-Registration Certificate available, Syaken Inspection N/A Options of Nissan SKYLINE GTR Power Windows, Power Steering, Cassette/Radio, 4WD, AC, Nissan SKYLINE Air Bags DriverintactPassengerintact Side PassengerN/ARoofN/A Seat DriverN/ASeat PassengerN/A PillarN/A Damage Details of this Nissan SKYLINE

[OneSlow5pt0]

pooplines

[VooDooXII]

pooplines

I'd go with an R32 or R33 if anything...

...I'd still rather import a TVR though.

[noridetoolow]

Little over a year left on the 2005 Jeep's lease.....when it goes back....Im building a new reliable toy.....

[VooDooXII]

That'd look pretty nice

[homemadeS14s]

... practical as in, something that you could afford within the next few years. Mine? Silverstone S2000 with red leather interior.

of course, id be rocking the amuse R1 bumper and some different wheels... but still.

I will own one of these sometime soon. Mark my words.

Yeah me to some day, that combo looks sick or may be black & red

[OneSlow5pt0]

I'd go with an R32 or R33 if anything...

...I'd still rather import a TVR though.

just import me a FTO

[VooDooXII]

just import me a FTO

Good call

[OneSlow5pt0]

Good call

Mhmm



id loave to y he eclipse is here,but not the FTO...which,imo...is the best looking FWD coupe to come out of japan....plus 200HP

[VooDooXII]

id loave to y he eclipse is here,but not the FTO...which,imo...is the best looking FWD coupe to come out of japan....plus 200HP

What?

I like the FTO better than the Eclipse...and yes, the FTO looks awesome.

[ATK_Designs]

I'd rock thew New Nissan GT-R or an BMW M6, or the Acura NSX. Something between 50-70K range.

[HatchMan]

My all time favorite: Rs4

[man]

My all time favorite: Rs4

I agree completely if it were up to styling alone, but Audi lost me when I saw the engine bay, engine is pushed as far forward as humanly possible. What is that about?

[HatchMan]

^^ so that the "nose" looks smaller which gives the car a more aggresive look.. a la BMW

[VooDooXII]

I agree completely if it were up to styling alone, but Audi lost me when I saw the engine bay, engine is pushed as far forward as humanly possible. What is that about?

Yea, I think Audi's are some of the best looking cars out there...simply stylish.

I really don't understand their layouts though...they all have terrible weight distribution. They've done well with the upcoming S5 though.

[man]

^^ so that the "nose" looks smaller which gives the car a more aggresive look.. a la BMW

vs.


Notice how the BMW motor is pushed all the way back to the firewall, giving 52-48 weight distribution (pretty good)

The RS4 on the other hand has its motor pushed towards the front of the car, resulting in a 58-42 distribution (not so good)

[VooDooXII]

I think it's because the Audi is primarily a front wheel drive car...and they do that longitudinal front-drive engine set up. They have that on the Passat...and even the Acura Legend.

The S5 has a 55/45 split...which is pretty good. Apparently, a slight front-bias is favorable because of the "squatting" from acceleration.

[man]

I think it's because the Audi is primarily a front wheel drive car...and they do that longitudinal front-drive engine set up. They have that on the Passat...and even the Acura Legend.

Their large list of awd cars make that less than acceptable though. And a rear bias is good for acceleration, on an awd/rwd car. Front weight throws off accel, braking, and handling

[GTScoob]

I'm really wanting my car to get up to around 400whp by 2010. It pretty much is my dream car for now, I just want to make it faster. I've got a feeling that once I get a big turbo on this car I'll be done with it but it wont be a DD by then.

Which brings me to my dream car of 2010, a used 02+ RSX Type S

[VooDooXII]

Their large list of awd cars make that less than acceptable though. And a rear bias is good for acceleration, on an awd/rwd car. Front weight throws off accel, braking, and handling

Yea, true...I guess that's just how Audi does their thing.

Whatever, I'd love an S5.

[DUBSf22c]

In 3 years i will be moving up from my sti to a NSX or SUPRA.. going back to school next year to make some more DUCKETS!




OR

[Deke]

I'm really wanting my car to get up to around 400whp by 2010. It pretty much is my dream car for now, I just want to make it faster. I've got a feeling that once I get a big turbo on this car I'll be done with it but it wont be a DD by then.

Which brings me to my dream car of 2010, a used 02+ RSX Type S

I almost got one of those instead of my wrx...I've never once regretted my decision

[esiatlanta]

here is my dream car,,,,,,,,,,,

[Z U L8R]

WEWT @ ELEANOR

nice

[BKgen®]

some of you hockey pucks are missing the point. Read the thread title:

"Post a picture of your PRACTICAL dream car (that you could afford by 2010)"

[Mike Lowrey]

some of you hockey pucks are missing the point. Read the thread title:

"Post a picture of your PRACTICAL dream car (that you could afford by 2010)"

x2

IA = Dumbasses who can't read

[DoriDori]

just import me a FTO

eewwwwww grosss!!!! haha jk

[1989_crx_si]

NA2 3.2 litre 6 speed NSX to my collection of NSX's









OR




LF-A if it goes into production

[1SICKLEX]