PDA

View Full Version : Pretty cool HP site.


Julio
06-03-2005, 11:24 PM
http://www.albeedigital.com/supercoupe/articles/0-60times.html
jrobbins30041
06-04-2005, 01:07 AM
2004 Dodge SRT-4 5.3 13.9

2003 Honda S2000 6.3 14.9 (Manual)

2004 Toyota Matrix XRS 7.2 / 15.7

2002 Volkswagen Passat W-8 4Motion 6.9 15.4

these really caught my eye, esp the srt 4...
tony
06-11-2005, 05:53 PM
hmm.. S2000's seem a lot faster than 6.3 and a 14.9 1/4 mile. I wonder where they got that from.
Julio
06-11-2005, 06:27 PM
Not really tony, I see sk2 run that or slower stock all the time.
Mike Lowrey
06-11-2005, 06:28 PM
hmm.. S2000's seem a lot faster than 6.3 and a 14.9 1/4 mile. I wonder where they got that from.

It also depends heavily on how you launch them.
tony
06-11-2005, 06:50 PM
ok I have a video, I know it isn't 0-60 but it is against a 6mt G35 coupe and I can tell you from experience they are not slow. S2000 is completely stock.

save as (http://home.earthlink.net/~matchframe/images/G35%20vs.%20S2000%2060-140.wmv)
CMO
06-11-2005, 07:35 PM
ok I have a video, I know it isn't 0-60 but it is against a 6mt G35 coupe and I can tell you from experience they are not slow. S2000 is completely stock

The s2000 isn't a 1/4 mile car that's why it ran the G35 so good on the highway. So I believe that it's times was 6.3 and a 14.9.
tony
06-11-2005, 07:53 PM
In most of the runs the G35 was playing catch up till about 80mph. 0-60 for the S2K is more like 5.4-5.8ish and definitely not a 14.9 1/4 mile, low 14's is more common provided its a decent driver.
dereksi
06-11-2005, 08:05 PM
15.7 baby. LOL
Ruiner
06-11-2005, 08:11 PM
2001 Porsche 911 Turbo 3.9 12.3 (I ran a 12.29, so this is dead on).
BufordŽ
06-11-2005, 08:11 PM
Huh... I must have been doing something well, because I got that time twice last time I ran, with bald tires. So I'm wondering if this is really accurate.
2002 Acura 3.2CL Type S 6.8 15.0
Ruiner
06-11-2005, 08:13 PM
These are all mag times...of which many of these times are "adjusted" for certain factors. For example, the 1996 Porsche 911 turbo (993) is listed at 12.1 sec in the 1/4 mile, but it isn't faster than my car. Then again, I have seen mine run 11.91 bone stock, but only one mag got that time. It might have been a fluke.
BufordŽ
06-11-2005, 08:24 PM
So apprearently this car's trap speed is 61 mph... Lol
1931 Chrysler CG Custom Imperial Lebaron Sports Roadster 385ci 20.0 21.5
BufordŽ
06-11-2005, 08:34 PM
1991 Jaguar XJR-15 4.5 12.6 :eek:
Brandon C
06-11-2005, 09:56 PM
1993 Honda Civic del Sol Si 8.8 16.8


woooohooooooooooo I made the Times list..well myne is a 1994
thamatrix
07-04-2005, 10:50 PM
15.7 with the matrix xrs.. not bad... is it stock.... ooo yea i own one
RandomGuy
07-05-2005, 01:51 AM
So apprearently this car's trap speed is 61 mph... Lol
1931 Chrysler CG Custom Imperial Lebaron Sports Roadster 385ci 20.0 21.5
lmao
SwiftGTiRacer
07-05-2005, 07:50 AM
I guess Suzuki is to exotic to name.

Swifty
Repost Squintz
07-05-2005, 01:09 PM
LOL my car is so damn slow its not even on that list...damn i need to get rid of this car
JITB
07-05-2005, 01:26 PM
they got 16.8 on a stock 90 protege, i ran 16.5 in my 93 stock.....OWNAG3
4dmin
07-05-2005, 02:41 PM
2004 Volkswagon Golf HPA R32 3.2 11.49
2004 Volkswagen GTI 1.8t (manual) 6.5 15.2
2004 Audi S4 4.9 n/a
Julio
07-05-2005, 03:08 PM
In most of the runs the G35 was playing catch up till about 80mph. 0-60 for the S2K is more like 5.4-5.8ish and definitely not a 14.9 1/4 mile, low 14's is more common provided its a decent driver.

I have never seen a s2k stock run better then a 14.9 at the track. Seen around 5 cars.