View Full Version : how do white pple really smell??
Tasuki_Civic
11-03-2006, 10:40 PM
wtf??? i dont get it when my friends say "dont get that perfume it smells like a white girl"
wtf does that mean?? perfume is perfume and if it smells good to me then thats just what i like.
like for instance...im currently house sitting and babysitting for this lady i know of. and im using their body wash ( which smells incredible) its like green tea and something. then i put my "love spell" lotion or perfume on from V.S and the a friend of mine came to visit me last nite and was like " dang you smell like a white girl now"
:thinking: i was like ...well what does that smell like? he said he doenst know how to describe it but white girls have a certain smell.
i dont know what hes talkin about? but whenever i hug my friends they either smell like perfume ( that smells good to me) or they smell like thier house just like any other person?
is there really a certain smell or are my friends just trippin??
Hulud
11-03-2006, 10:42 PM
theres not a smell between races
Tasuki_Civic
11-03-2006, 10:42 PM
:doh: i know that but my friends seem to think so
Hulud
11-03-2006, 10:43 PM
well you asked "is there really a certain smell or are my friends just trippin??"
Crazy Asian
11-03-2006, 10:44 PM
Hmmm I think girls smell all the same.
Tasuki_Civic
11-03-2006, 10:45 PM
well you asked "is there really a certain smell or are my friends just trippin??"
yea i did...ha well i know this and im sure about my answer but its just weird that pple say that. when i dont smell a difference...if your clean you smell good to me
Hulud
11-03-2006, 10:45 PM
if your clean you smell good to me
:stupid:
Crazy Asian
11-03-2006, 10:46 PM
Though the girl's vag have a diff smell. some like mexican taco and some like febreeze.
§treet_§peed
11-03-2006, 10:47 PM
i'm white..and i have never been told that i stink, always that i smell good lol
Tasuki_Civic
11-03-2006, 10:52 PM
i'm white..and i have never been told that i stink, always that i smell good lol
no no no dont get it twisted their not saying that white girls smell bad....they were sayin that they have a different good smell ( if you read the story mind you i tooko a shower and put on lotion from victoria secret)
Tasuki_Civic
11-03-2006, 10:52 PM
Though the girl's vag have a diff smell. some like mexican taco and some like febreeze.
haha what?
krindus
11-03-2006, 10:59 PM
i wouldn't say that certain people smell a certain way, but depending on the perfume they choose, or the way they naturally smell strikes memories in certain people reminding them of other people or of old memories, so depending on the person, a certain perfume/bodywash, might smell completely different. it's all relitive anyways
Tasuki_Civic
11-03-2006, 11:06 PM
i wouldn't say that certain people smell a certain way, but depending on the perfume they choose, or the way they naturally smell strikes memories in certain people reminding them of other people or of old memories, so depending on the person, a certain perfume/bodywash, might smell completely different. it's all relitive anyways
hmm ...didnt think about it that way....come to mention my friend last nite said it reminded him of this french chick he used to date. but my girlfriends dont date females but they still think the same as he.
Tasuki_Civic
11-03-2006, 11:07 PM
i was just askin what you guys thaought cuz when i question my friends they say " you just do" that wasnt good enough
BlkCD5
11-03-2006, 11:11 PM
how you smell also depends on what you eat too, but there is no difference in a certain races's body odor imo. Its just one of those things people say. For instance, I've heard people tell me that when it rains and a white person gets wet, they smell like a wet dog :screwy:. If you wash your shit, then you're good to go. :goodjob:
The Green Monster
11-03-2006, 11:17 PM
all i know is when i catch the scent of a female...i get aroused
prolly cuz this gay ass military college keeps me locked up from society from months on end :(
Tasuki_Civic
11-03-2006, 11:18 PM
how you smell also depends on what you eat too, but there is no difference in a certain races's body odor imo. Its just one of those things people say. For instance, I've heard people tell me that when it rains and a white person gets wet, they smell like a wet dog :screwy:. If you wash your shit, then you're good to go. :goodjob:
a wet dog?! omg :no: thats not right.
BlkCD5
11-03-2006, 11:28 PM
yea i know. Some people can be so ignorant. I've heard countless myths from people about different races. One time this white girl said the reason why black people jump so high is cus they have a third muscle in their back leg. :wtf:
Tasuki_Civic
11-03-2006, 11:31 PM
yea i know. Some people can be so ignorant. I've heard countless myths from people about different races. One time this white girl said the reason why black people jump so high is cus they have a third muscle in their back leg. :wtf:
LMAO waht? a third muscle?? :lmfao: :no: dumb ass. if there was third one im sure there woule be a whole new sport just from that once muscle
Crazy Asian
11-03-2006, 11:31 PM
What its true? Girls tata smells like mexican taco or febreeze. Some girls dont wash it and it reeks like old tacos or some girls love washing it like it was their boobs and so it smells like febreeze. Thought one girl I date her tata smelled like wasabi.
Tasuki_Civic
11-03-2006, 11:33 PM
What its true? Girls tata smells like mexican taco or febreeze. Some girls dont wash it and it reeks like old tacos or some girls love washing it like it was their boobs and so it smells like febreeze. Thought one girl I date her tata smelled like wasabi.
:lmfao: :lmfao:
Stormhammer
11-03-2006, 11:51 PM
i wouldn't say that certain people smell a certain way, but depending on the perfume they choose, or the way they naturally smell strikes memories in certain people reminding them of other people or of old memories, so depending on the person, a certain perfume/bodywash, might smell completely different. it's all relitive anyways
yup - perfume reacts differently smell wise to every person's skin - even if ever so slightly
Sonny BonaHo
11-03-2006, 11:59 PM
Though the girl's vag have a diff smell. some like mexican taco and some like febreeze.
:lmfao: :lmfao: :lmfao: :lmfao: :lmfao: :lmfao:
Sonny BonaHo
11-04-2006, 12:01 AM
wasabi 4 real?
ORGANIZATIONXIII
11-04-2006, 03:06 AM
but there is a smell on people regardless, your lotion/soap whatever you put on your skin either amplifies the smell or not..
so in most cases it can have a different scent on a different person
ahmonrah
11-04-2006, 03:32 AM
ok so there may not be a certain "smell between races" but there damn sure is between cultures!! like i'm standing in the airport waiting for my luggage to come out the carousel from my trip to chicago...this brotha stands next to me, waiting for his too. i just showered before taking my flight and put on AXE-TOUCH, one of my fav scents. so i'm standing there, suddenly it smells like a dead mule exploded in death valley. i sniff, look around, brotha next to me does the same thing. we look at eachother, and i'm like, "yo, somebody stink...gawd!" he agrees. now the smell gets worse as time goes on, it's like super concentrated. my girl is behind me, she coughs, i turn around and she points to him, brotha man, and in true "HAHA" FASHION leaves my ass to get the bags. so it get unbearable and finally i'm like "ok man, i'm sorry but you smell bad" his response? "no, bruddah...it is YOU that smell bad" right then, with his accent apparent now, i realized he was fresh from the motherland....AFRICA...
ahmonrah
11-04-2006, 03:33 AM
OH, AND DONT GET IT TWISTED! certain arab,european and indian cultures SAY NOOOO TO D.O. (deodorant for the dumb)
ORGANIZATIONXIII
11-04-2006, 04:03 AM
:stupid:
BTLFED
11-04-2006, 04:18 AM
Why in the fuck does every other thread and/or post you make lately have to do with RACE?! Holy SHIT this is ridiculous. You and your friends need to start looking at people as PEOPLE, not a color or smell. :rolleyes:
Hulud
11-04-2006, 09:05 AM
its not just lately
.....
11-04-2006, 10:16 AM
wtf??? i dont get it when my friends say "dont get that perfume it smells like a white girl"
wtf does that mean?? perfume is perfume and if it smells good to me then thats just what i like.
like for instance...im currently house sitting and babysitting for this lady i know of. and im using their body wash ( which smells incredible) its like green tea and something. then i put my "love spell" lotion or perfume on from V.S and the a friend of mine came to visit me last nite and was like " dang you smell like a white girl now"
:thinking: i was like ...well what does that smell like? he said he doenst know how to describe it but white girls have a certain smell.
i dont know what hes talkin about? but whenever i hug my friends they either smell like perfume ( that smells good to me) or they smell like thier house just like any other person?
is there really a certain smell or are my friends just trippin??
hahahahahahahahahahaha
The Golden Child
11-04-2006, 10:28 AM
ok hmmm i dont know about this one ..
HvyArms
11-04-2006, 11:07 AM
White girls smell like cheese, but when you add perfume they smell like Mayonaise. If they're having a "bad day", then it's kind of like a tartar sauce smell.
Black girls smell like chocolate, but when you add lotion they smell like caramel. Certain perfumes, when mixed with lotion and the natural chocolate smell, will produce a mayonaise like odor. On a "bad day", black girls smell like coffee.
Yellow girls smell like lemons, but when you add perfume they smell like bananas. If they're having a "bad day", then it's kind of a raw egg/hot mustard smell.
Brown girls smell like Hollister. I don't know why, I'm just stating the facts.
SLOWLYbtngU
11-04-2006, 11:11 AM
White girls smell like cheese, but when you add perfume they smell like Mayonaise. If they're having a "bad day", then it's kind of like a tartar sauce smell.
Black girls smell like chocolate, but when you add lotion they smell like caramel. Certain perfumes, when mixed with lotion and the natural chocolate smell, will produce a mayonaise like odor. On a "bad day", black girls smell like coffee.
Yellow girls smell like lemons, but when you add perfume they smell like bananas. If they're having a "bad day", then it's kind of a raw egg/hot mustard smell.
Brown girls smell like Hollister. I don't know why, I'm just stating the facts.
Hollister huh? hmmm...
:lmao:
The Golden Child
11-04-2006, 11:12 AM
White girls smell like cheese, but when you add perfume they smell like Mayonaise. If they're having a "bad day", then it's kind of like a tartar sauce smell.
Black girls smell like chocolate, but when you add lotion they smell like caramel. Certain perfumes, when mixed with lotion and the natural chocolate smell, will produce a mayonaise like odor. On a "bad day", black girls smell like coffee.
Yellow girls smell like lemons, but when you add perfume they smell like bananas. If they're having a "bad day", then it's kind of a raw egg/hot mustard smell.
Brown girls smell like Hollister. I don't know why, I'm just stating the facts.
where did you get this from personal expierience ??
TeeJay
11-04-2006, 11:14 AM
one racist thread after another....
The Golden Child
11-04-2006, 11:15 AM
FUCK YOU CRACKER !!!
lolz
2.0civic
11-04-2006, 11:16 AM
yea i know. Some people can be so ignorant. I've heard countless myths from people about different races. One time this white girl said the reason why black people jump so high is cus they have a third muscle in their back leg. :wtf:ive heard that shit too...i was like Thats BS and like these two idiots wanted to argue for about 30 minutes about it.
TeeJay
11-04-2006, 11:16 AM
FUCK YOU CRACKER !!!
lolz
OOOOOOOOkay hella yella fella
HvyArms
11-04-2006, 11:21 AM
where did you get this from personal expierience ??
No, I've never smelled a girl. They wont allow me to get close enough...:(
HvyArms
11-04-2006, 11:24 AM
Hollister huh? hmmm...
:lmao:
Hey, it is what it is:D
SLOWLYbtngU
11-04-2006, 11:25 AM
No, I've never smelled a girl. They wont allow me to get close enough...:(
O'rly??
HvyArms
11-04-2006, 11:37 AM
O'rly??
:sigh:
They're all like "ugh get away from me" and "dont speak to me outside of class" and "I dont date dwarfs"
BluesClues
11-04-2006, 11:41 AM
how you smell also depends on what you eat too, but there is no difference in a certain races's body odor imo. Its just one of those things people say. For instance, I've heard people tell me that when it rains and a white person gets wet, they smell like a wet dog :screwy:. If you wash your shit, then you're good to go. :goodjob:
This I can say is so very true. I was hanging out with some friends one day and it was raining and we all got wet. We all got in the car and they smelled so damn bad!!!!! I thought I would be sick. They do smell like wet dogs:yes:
Shit is crazy!!!!
TeeJay
11-04-2006, 11:42 AM
This I can say is so very true. I was hanging out with some friends one day and it was raining and we all got wet. We all got in the car and they smelled so damn bad!!!!! I thought I would be sick. They do smell like wet dogs:yes:
Shit is crazy!!!!
i have a dream...
HvyArms
11-04-2006, 11:44 AM
This I can say is so very true. I was hanging out with some friends one day and it was raining and we all got wet. We all got in the car and they smelled so damn bad!!!!! I thought I would be sick. They do smell like wet dogs:yes:
Shit is crazy!!!!
wait, how do you know it wasn't you?
BluesClues
11-04-2006, 11:45 AM
i have a dream...
I won't say all white people because I don't know all white people just the ones I used to hang around with. I can vouche for my experiences with wet white people. I know if my hair gets wet it has a smell to it because of the chemicals so I guess some black people may have a smell too
BluesClues
11-04-2006, 11:46 AM
wait, how do you know it wasn't you?
Seeing as that was the first time I have ever smelled that scent before
HvyArms
11-04-2006, 11:47 AM
Seeing as that was the first time I have ever smelled that scent before
Maybe you were having a "bad day"?
SLOWLYbtngU
11-04-2006, 11:49 AM
:sigh:
They're all like "ugh get away from me" and "dont speak to me outside of class" and "I dont date dwarfs"
So if ur a dwarf....:???: WHAT AM I!?!?!? :(
HvyArms
11-04-2006, 11:50 AM
So if ur a dwarf....:???: WHAT AM I!?!?!? :(
You're a girl, so you're not measured the same way I am. Girls dont like short guys:(
BluesClues
11-04-2006, 11:56 AM
Maybe you were having a "bad day"?
Uh no:no:
HvyArms
11-04-2006, 11:57 AM
Uh no:no:
Prove it!
BluesClues
11-04-2006, 12:02 PM
Prove it!
Not possible
HvyArms
11-04-2006, 12:03 PM
Not possible
It's definately possible, I wouldn't ask you to do something impossible.
BluesClues
11-04-2006, 12:04 PM
It's definately possible, I wouldn't ask you to do something impossible.
Well you are. I'm about to take a nap now
HvyArms
11-04-2006, 12:06 PM
Well you are. I'm about to take a nap now
wet dog taking a cat nap. thats wsup
quickdodge®
11-04-2006, 12:07 PM
how do white pple really smell??
As far as I know, all species of animal use an apparratus called The nose. The nose, from what i remember has been dated back as far as animals have been around. Here is a brief history of this wonderful device.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/fc/Neus1.jpg/180px-Neus1.jpg
Our nose forms a passage between the world around us and our windpipe, but this hasn’t always been the case. We land-based vertebrates or “tetrapods” (mammals, birds, reptiles, and amphibians) originally descend from fish, and fish cant breathe through their nose. On the side of a fish’s head there are two nostrils, one front and one back, that form the opening to a little sac containing the olfactory organs: water flows in through the front nostril and out through the back one, but there is no connection whatsoever to the throat. In other words, fish can smell with their nose, but not breathe.
We tetrapods may have only one external nostril on each side of our head, but we do have an inner nostril or “choana” that opens on the palate or in the throat. This is what makes it possible for us to breathe through our nose. But how did this inner nostril evolve? One thing all scientists agree about is that the front nostril in fish corresponds to our single outer nostril: the question is whether the back nostril was transformed into our choana by “migrating” to the palate, or whether the choana is a new opening that arose with tetrapods.
The answer to that question is of importance to a greater issue, namely, how large-scale evolution actually functions. This is the part of evolution that is perhaps most difficult to understand. Its easy for us to imagine how evolution deals with small steps, like developing a blue tit and a great titmouse from a common ancestor (this merely involves small details in plumage and size), but how does a nostril move from the face to the palate? Some scientists have claimed that it is impossible for an outer nostril to gradually migrate to the palate, since a “cord” of nerves and blood vessels runs just inside the row of teeth that the nostril would have to sever during its migration. The “cord” is in evidence both in fish and tetrapods, so it appears that nothing has happened to it during our evolution.
In a pinch like this, it is natural to turn to fossils to see what they can tell us, but thus far it hasnt been of much use. Among fossil “coelacanth” fish, which are the closest relatives of tetrapods, some forms have two outer nostrils but no choana, just like modern fish. Other fossil coelacanths, which are even closer to tetrapods, already have a single outer nostril per side and a fully developed choana. In other words, the fossils show that the choana emerged just before our ancestors crawled up onto land, but they tell us nothing about how the choana came to be formed.
Now two researchers, Per Ahlberg from the Department of Physiology and Developmental Biology, Uppsala University, and Zhu Min from the Department of Vertebrate Paleontology in Beijing, China, are able to present a unique fossil that clarifies once and for all how our inner nostril came into being. Their results are being published this week in the internationally respected scientific journal Nature.
The fossil is a small coelacanth fish, Kenichthys campbelli, which comes from China and is roughly 400 million years old. The scientists have found skulls of several individuals: some of the bones have fallen apart, but they are so well preserved that it is possible to see exactly how they fit together. Judging from their features, Kenichthys belongs in our ancestral tree between the fossil coelacanths who have no choana and those that have this inner nostril.
Kenichthys has a back nostril that is located right on the lip, separating the two-toothed upper jawbones, the maxillan and the premaxillan. (It is as if we were to have a nostril in a gap between our front teeth and our canine teeth.) In other words, it constitutes a perfect halfway point in the nostrils migration from the face to the palate, and moreover this halfway point is the precisely the one that some scientists have regarded as an anatomical impossibility. Unfortunately the “cord” of nerves and blood vessels has not been preserved in Kenichthys, but since it normally runs from the maxillan to the premaxillan, it must either have been cut off or relegated to another position. What was considered impossible was apparently possible after all.
At this stage we still don´t know how evolution managed to re-forge the contact between the maxillan and the premaxillan and re-establish the “cord” after the nostril had migrated past. Zhu and Ahlberg hope that future developmental biological research will be able to identify the molecular mechanisms that govern the formation of this section of the head. One thing is already apparent: there is a connection between the migration of the nostril in our ancestors and the rather common problem in human developmental biology that is termed “cleft jaw”.
During the development of the human fetus, the upper jaw is formed when two processes, which will form the maxillan and the premaxillan respectively, meet under the outer nostril and grow together. In this way they separate the outer nostril from the choana. If this coalescing process does not function, a so-called “cleft jaw” is formed, that is, a furrow that runs right up into the nasal sac. This “complicated” relationship between the upper jaw and the nasal sac does not exist in fish: after all, they have no nostril on the palate, so the upper jaw is quite simply formed below the nostrils without any problematic process of coalescence. It seems as if our complicated developmental process is a “memory” of how the back nostril made its way to the palate between the maxillan and the premaxillan, and then reconnoitered again behind it. Somewhat drastically it could be said that the intermediate form Kenichthys lived with a cleft jaw all its life. Thus a really old fossil fish can elucidate not only an important aspect of our early evolution but also the reasons behind one of the most common problems of human developmental biology.
Later, QD.
TeeJay
11-04-2006, 12:10 PM
As far as I know, all species of animal use an apparratus called The nose. The nose, from what i remember has been dated back as far as animals have been around. Here is a brief history of this wonderful device.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/fc/Neus1.jpg/180px-Neus1.jpg
Our nose forms a passage between the world around us and our windpipe, but this hasn’t always been the case. We land-based vertebrates or “tetrapods” (mammals, birds, reptiles, and amphibians) originally descend from fish, and fish cant breathe through their nose. On the side of a fish’s head there are two nostrils, one front and one back, that form the opening to a little sac containing the olfactory organs: water flows in through the front nostril and out through the back one, but there is no connection whatsoever to the throat. In other words, fish can smell with their nose, but not breathe.
We tetrapods may have only one external nostril on each side of our head, but we do have an inner nostril or “choana” that opens on the palate or in the throat. This is what makes it possible for us to breathe through our nose. But how did this inner nostril evolve? One thing all scientists agree about is that the front nostril in fish corresponds to our single outer nostril: the question is whether the back nostril was transformed into our choana by “migrating” to the palate, or whether the choana is a new opening that arose with tetrapods.
The answer to that question is of importance to a greater issue, namely, how large-scale evolution actually functions. This is the part of evolution that is perhaps most difficult to understand. Its easy for us to imagine how evolution deals with small steps, like developing a blue tit and a great titmouse from a common ancestor (this merely involves small details in plumage and size), but how does a nostril move from the face to the palate? Some scientists have claimed that it is impossible for an outer nostril to gradually migrate to the palate, since a “cord” of nerves and blood vessels runs just inside the row of teeth that the nostril would have to sever during its migration. The “cord” is in evidence both in fish and tetrapods, so it appears that nothing has happened to it during our evolution.
In a pinch like this, it is natural to turn to fossils to see what they can tell us, but thus far it hasnt been of much use. Among fossil “coelacanth” fish, which are the closest relatives of tetrapods, some forms have two outer nostrils but no choana, just like modern fish. Other fossil coelacanths, which are even closer to tetrapods, already have a single outer nostril per side and a fully developed choana. In other words, the fossils show that the choana emerged just before our ancestors crawled up onto land, but they tell us nothing about how the choana came to be formed.
Now two researchers, Per Ahlberg from the Department of Physiology and Developmental Biology, Uppsala University, and Zhu Min from the Department of Vertebrate Paleontology in Beijing, China, are able to present a unique fossil that clarifies once and for all how our inner nostril came into being. Their results are being published this week in the internationally respected scientific journal Nature.
The fossil is a small coelacanth fish, Kenichthys campbelli, which comes from China and is roughly 400 million years old. The scientists have found skulls of several individuals: some of the bones have fallen apart, but they are so well preserved that it is possible to see exactly how they fit together. Judging from their features, Kenichthys belongs in our ancestral tree between the fossil coelacanths who have no choana and those that have this inner nostril.
Kenichthys has a back nostril that is located right on the lip, separating the two-toothed upper jawbones, the maxillan and the premaxillan. (It is as if we were to have a nostril in a gap between our front teeth and our canine teeth.) In other words, it constitutes a perfect halfway point in the nostrils migration from the face to the palate, and moreover this halfway point is the precisely the one that some scientists have regarded as an anatomical impossibility. Unfortunately the “cord” of nerves and blood vessels has not been preserved in Kenichthys, but since it normally runs from the maxillan to the premaxillan, it must either have been cut off or relegated to another position. What was considered impossible was apparently possible after all.
At this stage we still don´t know how evolution managed to re-forge the contact between the maxillan and the premaxillan and re-establish the “cord” after the nostril had migrated past. Zhu and Ahlberg hope that future developmental biological research will be able to identify the molecular mechanisms that govern the formation of this section of the head. One thing is already apparent: there is a connection between the migration of the nostril in our ancestors and the rather common problem in human developmental biology that is termed “cleft jaw”.
During the development of the human fetus, the upper jaw is formed when two processes, which will form the maxillan and the premaxillan respectively, meet under the outer nostril and grow together. In this way they separate the outer nostril from the choana. If this coalescing process does not function, a so-called “cleft jaw” is formed, that is, a furrow that runs right up into the nasal sac. This “complicated” relationship between the upper jaw and the nasal sac does not exist in fish: after all, they have no nostril on the palate, so the upper jaw is quite simply formed below the nostrils without any problematic process of coalescence. It seems as if our complicated developmental process is a “memory” of how the back nostril made its way to the palate between the maxillan and the premaxillan, and then reconnoitered again behind it. Somewhat drastically it could be said that the intermediate form Kenichthys lived with a cleft jaw all its life. Thus a really old fossil fish can elucidate not only an important aspect of our early evolution but also the reasons behind one of the most common problems of human developmental biology.
Later, QD.
oh my lord, fucking LEGENDARY!!!!!!!!!!!! :lmfao: :lmfao: :lmfao: :lmfao:
HvyArms
11-04-2006, 12:10 PM
As far as I know, all species of animal use an apparratus called The nose. The nose, from what i remember has been dated back as far as animals have been around. Here is a brief history of this wonderful device.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/fc/Neus1.jpg/180px-Neus1.jpg
Our nose forms a passage between the world around us and our windpipe, but this hasn’t always been the case. We land-based vertebrates or “tetrapods” (mammals, birds, reptiles, and amphibians) originally descend from fish, and fish cant breathe through their nose. On the side of a fish’s head there are two nostrils, one front and one back, that form the opening to a little sac containing the olfactory organs: water flows in through the front nostril and out through the back one, but there is no connection whatsoever to the throat. In other words, fish can smell with their nose, but not breathe.
We tetrapods may have only one external nostril on each side of our head, but we do have an inner nostril or “choana” that opens on the palate or in the throat. This is what makes it possible for us to breathe through our nose. But how did this inner nostril evolve? One thing all scientists agree about is that the front nostril in fish corresponds to our single outer nostril: the question is whether the back nostril was transformed into our choana by “migrating” to the palate, or whether the choana is a new opening that arose with tetrapods.
The answer to that question is of importance to a greater issue, namely, how large-scale evolution actually functions. This is the part of evolution that is perhaps most difficult to understand. Its easy for us to imagine how evolution deals with small steps, like developing a blue tit and a great titmouse from a common ancestor (this merely involves small details in plumage and size), but how does a nostril move from the face to the palate? Some scientists have claimed that it is impossible for an outer nostril to gradually migrate to the palate, since a “cord” of nerves and blood vessels runs just inside the row of teeth that the nostril would have to sever during its migration. The “cord” is in evidence both in fish and tetrapods, so it appears that nothing has happened to it during our evolution.
In a pinch like this, it is natural to turn to fossils to see what they can tell us, but thus far it hasnt been of much use. Among fossil “coelacanth” fish, which are the closest relatives of tetrapods, some forms have two outer nostrils but no choana, just like modern fish. Other fossil coelacanths, which are even closer to tetrapods, already have a single outer nostril per side and a fully developed choana. In other words, the fossils show that the choana emerged just before our ancestors crawled up onto land, but they tell us nothing about how the choana came to be formed.
Now two researchers, Per Ahlberg from the Department of Physiology and Developmental Biology, Uppsala University, and Zhu Min from the Department of Vertebrate Paleontology in Beijing, China, are able to present a unique fossil that clarifies once and for all how our inner nostril came into being. Their results are being published this week in the internationally respected scientific journal Nature.
The fossil is a small coelacanth fish, Kenichthys campbelli, which comes from China and is roughly 400 million years old. The scientists have found skulls of several individuals: some of the bones have fallen apart, but they are so well preserved that it is possible to see exactly how they fit together. Judging from their features, Kenichthys belongs in our ancestral tree between the fossil coelacanths who have no choana and those that have this inner nostril.
Kenichthys has a back nostril that is located right on the lip, separating the two-toothed upper jawbones, the maxillan and the premaxillan. (It is as if we were to have a nostril in a gap between our front teeth and our canine teeth.) In other words, it constitutes a perfect halfway point in the nostrils migration from the face to the palate, and moreover this halfway point is the precisely the one that some scientists have regarded as an anatomical impossibility. Unfortunately the “cord” of nerves and blood vessels has not been preserved in Kenichthys, but since it normally runs from the maxillan to the premaxillan, it must either have been cut off or relegated to another position. What was considered impossible was apparently possible after all.
At this stage we still don´t know how evolution managed to re-forge the contact between the maxillan and the premaxillan and re-establish the “cord” after the nostril had migrated past. Zhu and Ahlberg hope that future developmental biological research will be able to identify the molecular mechanisms that govern the formation of this section of the head. One thing is already apparent: there is a connection between the migration of the nostril in our ancestors and the rather common problem in human developmental biology that is termed “cleft jaw”.
During the development of the human fetus, the upper jaw is formed when two processes, which will form the maxillan and the premaxillan respectively, meet under the outer nostril and grow together. In this way they separate the outer nostril from the choana. If this coalescing process does not function, a so-called “cleft jaw” is formed, that is, a furrow that runs right up into the nasal sac. This “complicated” relationship between the upper jaw and the nasal sac does not exist in fish: after all, they have no nostril on the palate, so the upper jaw is quite simply formed below the nostrils without any problematic process of coalescence. It seems as if our complicated developmental process is a “memory” of how the back nostril made its way to the palate between the maxillan and the premaxillan, and then reconnoitered again behind it. Somewhat drastically it could be said that the intermediate form Kenichthys lived with a cleft jaw all its life. Thus a really old fossil fish can elucidate not only an important aspect of our early evolution but also the reasons behind one of the most common problems of human developmental biology.
Later, QD.
That's exactly what I was about to say, but I couldn't find a pic of the nose.
quickdodge®
11-04-2006, 12:38 PM
That's exactly what I was about to say, but I couldn't find a pic of the nose.
Yeah. I thought I'd never find a pic. It took damn near one full second to Google-search one. Lolol. Later, QD.
BTLFED
11-04-2006, 01:31 PM
As far as I know, all species of animal use an apparratus called The nose. The nose, from what i remember has been dated back as far as animals have been around. Here is a brief history of this wonderful device.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/fc/Neus1.jpg/180px-Neus1.jpg
Our nose forms a passage between the world around us and our windpipe, but this hasn’t always been the case. We land-based vertebrates or “tetrapods” (mammals, birds, reptiles, and amphibians) originally descend from fish, and fish cant breathe through their nose. On the side of a fish’s head there are two nostrils, one front and one back, that form the opening to a little sac containing the olfactory organs: water flows in through the front nostril and out through the back one, but there is no connection whatsoever to the throat. In other words, fish can smell with their nose, but not breathe.
We tetrapods may have only one external nostril on each side of our head, but we do have an inner nostril or “choana” that opens on the palate or in the throat. This is what makes it possible for us to breathe through our nose. But how did this inner nostril evolve? One thing all scientists agree about is that the front nostril in fish corresponds to our single outer nostril: the question is whether the back nostril was transformed into our choana by “migrating” to the palate, or whether the choana is a new opening that arose with tetrapods.
The answer to that question is of importance to a greater issue, namely, how large-scale evolution actually functions. This is the part of evolution that is perhaps most difficult to understand. Its easy for us to imagine how evolution deals with small steps, like developing a blue tit and a great titmouse from a common ancestor (this merely involves small details in plumage and size), but how does a nostril move from the face to the palate? Some scientists have claimed that it is impossible for an outer nostril to gradually migrate to the palate, since a “cord” of nerves and blood vessels runs just inside the row of teeth that the nostril would have to sever during its migration. The “cord” is in evidence both in fish and tetrapods, so it appears that nothing has happened to it during our evolution.
In a pinch like this, it is natural to turn to fossils to see what they can tell us, but thus far it hasnt been of much use. Among fossil “coelacanth” fish, which are the closest relatives of tetrapods, some forms have two outer nostrils but no choana, just like modern fish. Other fossil coelacanths, which are even closer to tetrapods, already have a single outer nostril per side and a fully developed choana. In other words, the fossils show that the choana emerged just before our ancestors crawled up onto land, but they tell us nothing about how the choana came to be formed.
Now two researchers, Per Ahlberg from the Department of Physiology and Developmental Biology, Uppsala University, and Zhu Min from the Department of Vertebrate Paleontology in Beijing, China, are able to present a unique fossil that clarifies once and for all how our inner nostril came into being. Their results are being published this week in the internationally respected scientific journal Nature.
The fossil is a small coelacanth fish, Kenichthys campbelli, which comes from China and is roughly 400 million years old. The scientists have found skulls of several individuals: some of the bones have fallen apart, but they are so well preserved that it is possible to see exactly how they fit together. Judging from their features, Kenichthys belongs in our ancestral tree between the fossil coelacanths who have no choana and those that have this inner nostril.
Kenichthys has a back nostril that is located right on the lip, separating the two-toothed upper jawbones, the maxillan and the premaxillan. (It is as if we were to have a nostril in a gap between our front teeth and our canine teeth.) In other words, it constitutes a perfect halfway point in the nostrils migration from the face to the palate, and moreover this halfway point is the precisely the one that some scientists have regarded as an anatomical impossibility. Unfortunately the “cord” of nerves and blood vessels has not been preserved in Kenichthys, but since it normally runs from the maxillan to the premaxillan, it must either have been cut off or relegated to another position. What was considered impossible was apparently possible after all.
At this stage we still don´t know how evolution managed to re-forge the contact between the maxillan and the premaxillan and re-establish the “cord” after the nostril had migrated past. Zhu and Ahlberg hope that future developmental biological research will be able to identify the molecular mechanisms that govern the formation of this section of the head. One thing is already apparent: there is a connection between the migration of the nostril in our ancestors and the rather common problem in human developmental biology that is termed “cleft jaw”.
During the development of the human fetus, the upper jaw is formed when two processes, which will form the maxillan and the premaxillan respectively, meet under the outer nostril and grow together. In this way they separate the outer nostril from the choana. If this coalescing process does not function, a so-called “cleft jaw” is formed, that is, a furrow that runs right up into the nasal sac. This “complicated” relationship between the upper jaw and the nasal sac does not exist in fish: after all, they have no nostril on the palate, so the upper jaw is quite simply formed below the nostrils without any problematic process of coalescence. It seems as if our complicated developmental process is a “memory” of how the back nostril made its way to the palate between the maxillan and the premaxillan, and then reconnoitered again behind it. Somewhat drastically it could be said that the intermediate form Kenichthys lived with a cleft jaw all its life. Thus a really old fossil fish can elucidate not only an important aspect of our early evolution but also the reasons behind one of the most common problems of human developmental biology.
Later, QD.
This is the best post in this thread! :lmfao:
Reps awarded!
Tasuki_Civic
11-04-2006, 07:03 PM
Why in the fuck does every other thread and/or post you make lately have to do with RACE?! Holy SHIT this is ridiculous. You and your friends need to start looking at people as PEOPLE, not a color or smell. :rolleyes:
haha i think you have things wrong with me as far as who i am. but your not worth my time to explain. but rather i would like to say is that i come in contact with it almost everyday. because of it i would like to discuss it sometimes. not that im bashing anyone ( as you think i am) but more of questioning. i would like to know things just as if it was a car. if i dont know i will ask. if i learn something i will share.
simple as that.
just lately i have been seeing it. and theres is nothing wrong with questioning. at this moment in time. you guys (IA) give me a different view of what people think about the world and everything in it as well. i learn from those who put out "stupid comments" as well as those that are meaningful and worth listenting to. thats how one learns and grows outside of books or just being visual. theres alot of things on IA besides me that brings up race and differentiality. without saying or word or speaking their mind wither its a joke or not.
its not just lately
and YOU can STFU :yes:
Tasuki_Civic
11-04-2006, 07:08 PM
wait, how do you know it wasn't you?
Seeing as that was the first time I have ever smelled that scent before
Maybe you were having a "bad day"?
:lmfao:
As far as I know, all species of animal use an apparratus called The nose. The nose, from what i remember has been dated back as far as animals have been around. Here is a brief history of this wonderful device.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/fc/Neus1.jpg/180px-Neus1.jpg
Our nose forms a passage between the world around us and our windpipe, but this hasn’t always been the case. We land-based vertebrates or “tetrapods” (mammals, birds, reptiles, and amphibians) originally descend from fish, and fish cant breathe through their nose. On the side of a fish’s head there are two nostrils, one front and one back, that form the opening to a little sac containing the olfactory organs: water flows in through the front nostril and out through the back one, but there is no connection whatsoever to the throat. In other words, fish can smell with their nose, but not breathe.
We tetrapods may have only one external nostril on each side of our head, but we do have an inner nostril or “choana” that opens on the palate or in the throat. This is what makes it possible for us to breathe through our nose. But how did this inner nostril evolve? One thing all scientists agree about is that the front nostril in fish corresponds to our single outer nostril: the question is whether the back nostril was transformed into our choana by “migrating” to the palate, or whether the choana is a new opening that arose with tetrapods.
The answer to that question is of importance to a greater issue, namely, how large-scale evolution actually functions. This is the part of evolution that is perhaps most difficult to understand. Its easy for us to imagine how evolution deals with small steps, like developing a blue tit and a great titmouse from a common ancestor (this merely involves small details in plumage and size), but how does a nostril move from the face to the palate? Some scientists have claimed that it is impossible for an outer nostril to gradually migrate to the palate, since a “cord” of nerves and blood vessels runs just inside the row of teeth that the nostril would have to sever during its migration. The “cord” is in evidence both in fish and tetrapods, so it appears that nothing has happened to it during our evolution.
In a pinch like this, it is natural to turn to fossils to see what they can tell us, but thus far it hasnt been of much use. Among fossil “coelacanth” fish, which are the closest relatives of tetrapods, some forms have two outer nostrils but no choana, just like modern fish. Other fossil coelacanths, which are even closer to tetrapods, already have a single outer nostril per side and a fully developed choana. In other words, the fossils show that the choana emerged just before our ancestors crawled up onto land, but they tell us nothing about how the choana came to be formed.
Now two researchers, Per Ahlberg from the Department of Physiology and Developmental Biology, Uppsala University, and Zhu Min from the Department of Vertebrate Paleontology in Beijing, China, are able to present a unique fossil that clarifies once and for all how our inner nostril came into being. Their results are being published this week in the internationally respected scientific journal Nature.
The fossil is a small coelacanth fish, Kenichthys campbelli, which comes from China and is roughly 400 million years old. The scientists have found skulls of several individuals: some of the bones have fallen apart, but they are so well preserved that it is possible to see exactly how they fit together. Judging from their features, Kenichthys belongs in our ancestral tree between the fossil coelacanths who have no choana and those that have this inner nostril.
Kenichthys has a back nostril that is located right on the lip, separating the two-toothed upper jawbones, the maxillan and the premaxillan. (It is as if we were to have a nostril in a gap between our front teeth and our canine teeth.) In other words, it constitutes a perfect halfway point in the nostrils migration from the face to the palate, and moreover this halfway point is the precisely the one that some scientists have regarded as an anatomical impossibility. Unfortunately the “cord” of nerves and blood vessels has not been preserved in Kenichthys, but since it normally runs from the maxillan to the premaxillan, it must either have been cut off or relegated to another position. What was considered impossible was apparently possible after all.
At this stage we still don´t know how evolution managed to re-forge the contact between the maxillan and the premaxillan and re-establish the “cord” after the nostril had migrated past. Zhu and Ahlberg hope that future developmental biological research will be able to identify the molecular mechanisms that govern the formation of this section of the head. One thing is already apparent: there is a connection between the migration of the nostril in our ancestors and the rather common problem in human developmental biology that is termed “cleft jaw”.
During the development of the human fetus, the upper jaw is formed when two processes, which will form the maxillan and the premaxillan respectively, meet under the outer nostril and grow together. In this way they separate the outer nostril from the choana. If this coalescing process does not function, a so-called “cleft jaw” is formed, that is, a furrow that runs right up into the nasal sac. This “complicated” relationship between the upper jaw and the nasal sac does not exist in fish: after all, they have no nostril on the palate, so the upper jaw is quite simply formed below the nostrils without any problematic process of coalescence. It seems as if our complicated developmental process is a “memory” of how the back nostril made its way to the palate between the maxillan and the premaxillan, and then reconnoitered again behind it. Somewhat drastically it could be said that the intermediate form Kenichthys lived with a cleft jaw all its life. Thus a really old fossil fish can elucidate not only an important aspect of our early evolution but also the reasons behind one of the most common problems of human developmental biology.
Later, QD.
LOL classic
Hulud
11-04-2006, 07:55 PM
and YOU can STFU :yes:
why?
because i state the obvious? :goodjob:
if you go back and look at a bunch of threads you have made they are based on race.
Tasuki_Civic
11-04-2006, 08:03 PM
why?
because i state the obvious? :goodjob:
if you go back and look at a bunch of threads you have made they are based on race.
lately ass....didnt i said i know that....i know my threads and what i have written in each one. chill out. ive been in IA for a while now. im sure you havent gone thru every single thread and post. unless your a stalker
Hulud
11-04-2006, 08:08 PM
lately ass....didnt i said i know that....i know my threads and what i have written in each one. chill out.
i am "chill"
ive been in IA for a while now. im sure you havent gone thru every single thread and post. unless your a stalker
no thats why i didnt say all
Jaimecbr900
11-04-2006, 08:11 PM
This girl sees EVERYTHING in only Black or White.
We should all throw some money together and buy her some COLOR enhancing lenses, so she can see that there are WAY MORE colors in the world besides just BLACK and WHITE. :rolleyes:
Tasuki_Civic
11-04-2006, 08:16 PM
This girl sees EVERYTHING in only Black or White.
We should all throw some money together and buy her some COLOR enhancing lenses, so she can see that there are WAY MORE colors in the world besides just BLACK and WHITE. :rolleyes:
haha here we go another one. no im just wonderin how things are in america. but i would expect that comment for a person who doesnt know me.
i like everything and love everything...i dont see only 2 colors or it wouldnt make me who i am today. and i wouldnt be on this site if i was one color/ one side.
i promise. ;)
TheSnail
11-04-2006, 08:18 PM
I know all fat girls smell like soap.
Tasuki_Civic
11-04-2006, 08:20 PM
I know all fat girls smell like soap.
haha they should maan....shit cuz if big pple didnt keep clean they reeeeeeek :no: this dude i knew in high school was really big and he smelled like doo doo sometimes. that was different to my nose
TheSnail
11-04-2006, 08:24 PM
Yeah I knew a fat girl in 8th grade that carried a bar of soup with here. She would go in the bathroom 3X a day to rub herself down with it. As if she was to broke to afford perfume or too lazy to take a shower.
Jaimecbr900
11-04-2006, 08:24 PM
no im just wonderin how things are in america.
As opposed to where?
but i would expect that comment for a person who doesnt know me.
Considering I'm not the only one telling you the same thing, seems like plenty others see the same thing. We see what you post. You like to post about Black this and White that. Everything to you is divided by colors first and everything else last.
eViLMunkey
11-04-2006, 08:25 PM
Gotta stay fresh and clean... :yes:
TheSnail
11-04-2006, 08:27 PM
mmm...
http://www.boxsocial.org/daily/irishspring.jpg
Hulud
11-04-2006, 08:41 PM
Gotta stay fresh and clean... :yes:
so fresh, so clean
TheSnail
11-04-2006, 08:44 PM
so fresh, so clean
so fresh and so clean, clean.
Hulud
11-04-2006, 08:45 PM
so fresh and so clean, clean.
thank you lol
Tasuki_Civic
11-04-2006, 08:46 PM
As opposed to where?
Considering I'm not the only one telling you the same thing, seems like plenty others see the same thing. We see what you post. You like to post about Black this and White that. Everything to you is divided by colors first and everything else last.
anywhere....and well yea thats all i have been mainly around for the past several months. observing likes and dislikes, difference and similarities......
so youo guys are telling me its wrong for me to question things cuz if i do im a racsit person...please. thats crazy. i cant help at this moment in time that im around only black and white pple. when i go to parties its a mix of both and like maybe just maybe "one" of other races.
if i was around black pple and latinos ha i would do the same thing. now if i do that does that make me a racsist person? :no: i just wonder about different ethnic groupse of all kinds. everyone is different and i aim to learn both sides instead of stickin to one or being in a crowd full of pple and i dont know how pple work and why.
i mean really. i sit at home all day or keep myself busy in other ways and i go out as well. so in the mean time( while im not workin and healing my body) i think about t hings that pple may not or talk about things other are scared to. i dont care and i dont mind. i like to learrn with out always reading a book. what better way than to ask. and the source at this moment that i can get a quick and easy response is from IA. well atleast from a respons frommany pple that are not one sided and it beats askin a person one by one how they feel about things i think about.
its not a bad thing to question and thats all i do. youo cant fault me for that. so lately it has crossed my mind how pple are in general. and how pple live and think.
at this moment im babysitting for this white lady. her kids are amazing to me. im so happy i am the one to do so. shes has trusted me with her house and kids and pets. its awsome to be somewhere where its not the norm for me. and to learn how this family lives and families ini this neighborhood. the littel girl is awsomoe and she asks so many questions about pple and ethic groups as well. some i could answer and others i didnt know the answer to that i would like to know as well.
basicly you guys are gettin on me cause i question black and white and i told you why.....so now you still think im a bad person for questioning?
lol i would understnad if i was bashin on white pple and was pro-black about everything. im not. go back in my posts and see. i only talk about what i experience, what i see, and what others tell me. i see nothing wrong with that. is no one interested in other cultures and why they are the way they are? instead of assuming what you see on TV and the radio and "he said she said"
Tasuki_Civic
11-04-2006, 08:46 PM
mmm...
http://www.boxsocial.org/daily/irishspring.jpg
haha
Hulud
11-04-2006, 08:50 PM
so youo guys are telling me its wrong for me to question things cuz if i do im a racsit person...
no, when you blatantly say that you would treat a white person differently than a black person, that is rascism.
we've gone over this in another thread but you couldnt seem to graps what i was saying
Tasuki_Civic
11-04-2006, 09:07 PM
no, when you blatantly say that you would treat a white person differently than a black person, that is rascism.
we've gone over this in another thread but you couldnt seem to graps what i was saying
ooh gawd...we dont understand each other sweetheart so stop bringing it up. no matter how hard i try or you try we will never know. so leave that alone.
Hulud
11-04-2006, 09:08 PM
i just brought it up b/c you said "so youo guys are telling me its wrong for me to question things cuz if i do im a racsit person..."
so i was clarifying
quickdodge®
11-04-2006, 10:41 PM
http://www.tursa.franken.de/pics/sch_summerbreeze1.jpg
Later, QD.
ahmonrah
11-04-2006, 11:14 PM
STOP ARGUING!! WHEN WHITE PEOPLE GET WET, THEY SMELL. WHEN BLK PEOPLE GET WET, MORE OFTEN THAN NOT WE ARE HEADING TO A MORGUE.....
Hulud
11-04-2006, 11:15 PM
STOP ARGUING!! WHEN WHITE PEOPLE GET WET, THEY SMELL. WHEN BLK PEOPLE GET WET, MORE OFTEN THAN NOT WE ARE HEADING TO A MORGUE.....
wtf? LOLOL
ahmonrah
11-04-2006, 11:16 PM
wtf? LOLOLnah mean??!! :lmfao:
xaznstylegrlx
11-05-2006, 01:01 AM
i smell like "asian girl" >.>
BTLFED
11-05-2006, 01:14 AM
Considering I'm not the only one telling you the same thing, seems like plenty others see the same thing. We see what you post. You like to post about Black this and White that. Everything to you is divided by colors first and everything else last.
Exactly. Best post in this thread. :goodjob:
Hulud
11-05-2006, 01:15 AM
nah mean??!! :lmfao:
yea i nah mean lol
ahmonrah
11-05-2006, 02:04 AM
i smell like "asian girl" >.>
~sliding xaznstylegrlx window open~
~slinking through the window~
~crawling over to bed~
~sniffs covers~
~jots in notepad~
"asian girl smell confirmed"
"crawl through lil paki window"
~slinks outta window~
quickdodge®
11-05-2006, 07:41 AM
no, when you blatantly say that you would treat a white person differently than a black person, that is rascism.
I agree with that. Later, QD.
quickdodge®
11-05-2006, 07:41 AM
Exactly. Best post in this thread. :goodjob:
Asshole. Later, QD.
gsx607
11-05-2006, 09:50 AM
I stumble upon this thread, and just wanted to say one thing only:
Uncle Rucky's love of white people...
"The white man just a joy to be around. Smell like lemon juice and Pledge furniture cleaner"
bigdare23
11-05-2006, 09:53 AM
I stumble upon this thread, and just wanted to say one thing only:
Uncle Rucky's love of white people...
"The white man just a joy to be around. Smell like lemon juice and Pledge furniture cleaner"
dont you mean Ruckus???
BTLFED
11-05-2006, 10:50 AM
Asshole. Later, QD.
I already gave you reps for yours, asshat. I would have repped Jaime too, but I have to spread it around first LOL
quickdodge®
11-05-2006, 11:05 AM
No. You said my post was the best. Lolol. Later, QD.
BTLFED
11-05-2006, 11:17 AM
No. You said my post was the best. Lolol. Later, QD.
Okay, well both your posts were the best then LOL
Hulud
11-05-2006, 11:19 AM
Fuck you both mines the best
TeeJay
11-05-2006, 11:20 AM
aint nobody dope as me, im just so fresh so clean
TeeJay
11-05-2006, 11:20 AM
dont you think im so sexy, im just so fresh so clean
BTLFED
11-05-2006, 11:21 AM
Betcha can't do it like me, NOPE!
TeeJay
11-05-2006, 11:27 AM
teddy, pendergrass cooler than freddy jackson sippin a milkshake in a snowstorm, left her throat warm at the dorm room at the AU
Tasuki_Civic
11-05-2006, 08:12 PM
lol funny
BTLFED
11-05-2006, 09:03 PM
lol funny
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^racise
Crazy Asian
11-05-2006, 09:04 PM
No you are.
Leisa
11-05-2006, 09:09 PM
wtf??? i dont get it when my friends say "dont get that perfume it smells like a white girl"
what the fuck??????????
Tasuki_Civic
11-05-2006, 09:11 PM
what the fuck??????????
thats what i said
BTLFED
11-05-2006, 09:14 PM
No you are.
How do you figure? I didn't even have any white friends until I moved out here. I don't look at people by color. The only thing I am "racist" against is ignorance and stupidity, and both don't have a color preference.
ShooterMcGavin
11-06-2006, 12:32 AM
white ppl smell like popcorn, black folks smell like fried chicken, azns smell like rice, beaners smell like hot sauce and brownies smell like bad BO...there, i think i covered them all :lmao:
TeeJay
11-06-2006, 08:38 AM
white ppl smell like popcorn, black folks smell like fried chicken, azns smell like rice, beaners smell like hot sauce and brownies smell like bad BO...there, i think i covered them all :lmao:
HECK NALL!!!!!! :lmfao:
Jaimecbr900
11-06-2006, 09:19 AM
You always seem to try and justify that you're not doing something, yet it ends up backfiring on you every time.
Let's take a look at your rebuttal post and let's highlight somethings, shall we? ;)
so youo guys are telling me its wrong for me to question things cuz if i do im a racsit person...please. thats crazy. i cant help at this moment in time that im around only black and white pple. when i go to parties its a mix of both and like maybe just maybe "one" of other races.
Exhibit A. Noone is telling you that you're right or wrong, people are telling you that you see things in black/white FIRST. THAT is a sign of racism. You can fall on your ass denying it, but it's true. The sooner you learn this concept, the sooner you will truly "learn" something. As you can see above, it's always COLORS with you, not just plain ole people. It's always "BLACK" people, or "WHITE" lady, or "WHITE" America...... :rolleyes: Yet you swear up and down YOU are not racist. Well, when I refer to someone I refer to them as a person, NOT a COLOR. If someone is an ass, COLOR doesn't and shouldn't matter.....they're an ASS, period. Not a WHITE BOY ASSHOLE. What's WHITE got to do with it??? ;) Get it? Probably not.
if i was around black pple and latinos ha i would do the same thing. now if i do that does that make me a racsist person? :no:
Exhibit B. There you go again with the colors and the races.
i just wonder about different ethnic groupse of all kinds. everyone is different and i aim to learn both sides instead of stickin to one or being in a crowd full of pple and i dont know how pple work and why.
Exhibit C. Wonder WHAT exactly? If we have a particular smell or like certain foods or beat our kids......WHAT is it that you are "wondering about"? You want to learn someone's culture and background, you don't do it by insulting them and asking stupid ass questions like "what do WHITE people smell like....." That's stupid. You have a crappy way of expressing yourself if that's your way of thinking.
i think about t hings that pple may not or talk about things other are scared to.
That's probably because they're racist thoughts. You are right though, most people don't think about things in the same terms you do. Thank God for small favors. :rolleyes:
i dont care and i dont mind. i like to learrn with out always reading a book. what better way than to ask. and the source at this moment that i can get a quick and easy response is from IA. well atleast from a respons frommany pple that are not one sided and it beats askin a person one by one how they feel about things i think about.
Exhibit C. Maybe you SHOULD pick up a book and read some. Although I'm sure if it didn't agree with your view of life and the world, you'd call it slanted and "one sided". :rolleyes:
If you source of "research" into LIFE and it's experiences is IA......like Bill Engle (sp?) says, "theeerrreeessss your sign!!!......" :lmfao:
its not a bad thing to question and thats all i do. youo cant fault me for that. so lately it has crossed my mind how pple are in general. and how pple live and think.
Then ask a question and leave the WHITE this and BLACK that OUT of it.
at this moment im babysitting for this white lady. her kids are amazing to me. im so happy i am the one to do so. shes has trusted me with her house and kids and pets. its awsome to be somewhere where its not the norm for me. and to learn how this family lives and families ini this neighborhood. the littel girl is awsomoe and she asks so many questions about pple and ethic groups as well. some i could answer and others i didnt know the answer to that i would like to know as well.
Exhibit D. Why does it have to be WHITE lady vs just plain ole lady. The message is the same. The WHITE part of the description is irrelevant. If she was BLACK or WHITE or GREEN, she is STILL someone whom you are babysitting/working for. The COLOR does NOT change that fact. Right? So why even bring it up IF you're not thinking in terms of COLOR????? It's just like when someone purposely says something that they KNOW will hurt someone else just to get a little "zinger" into a sentence. Divorces are a great example of that. Many things are said that are totally irrelevant to a divorce proceeding. They are said by one side merely to piss off the other.
What do you mean by "this" neighborhood? You mean a WHITE neighborhood, right? Again, what does COLOR/RACE have to do with it? Can you not convey your message without it? Then maybe you should learn to communicate better then.
Do you get it now? Probably not.
basicly you guys are gettin on me cause i question black and white and i told you why.....so now you still think im a bad person for questioning?
Yes, because you asking ignorant and senseless questions based solely on one central subject; COLOR/RACE.
I'm willing to bet that 99% of your threads have to do with one of three main subjects YOU obviously love: COLOR, RACE, and SEX.
Wanna bet? ;)
Yet you're always trying to tell people to take you seriously and that you're classy and that you're this and that you're that. If you want people to take you seriously, then don't act stupid. Learn to communicate in legible sentences and complete thoughts. Maybe then people will take you seriously. Until then, you're just irritating the hell out of quite a few people. I know you don't care, but that's the facts.
lol i would understnad if i was bashin on white pple and was pro-black about everything. im not. go back in my posts and see. i only talk about what i experience, what i see, and what others tell me. i see nothing wrong with that. is no one interested in other cultures and why they are the way they are? instead of assuming what you see on TV and the radio and "he said she said"
Final Exhibit, and then we'll let the jury decide. ;)
Again with the colors. You don't seem to see the same things other see in your posts. Even people that are polar opposites in so many ways AGREE on this. As I challenged above, I would be very surprised if someone took all the threads started by you and gave a report different than what many people have seen and told you. You don't want to believe it, fine.
BTW, you can't have it both ways. This is what I mean by learning to communicate more clearly.
In one sentence you say that what you preach is based on this that AND on "what others TELL you", right? So how can you conclude by saying that you want to broaden your horizons and not just take what "he said/she said"????? :thinking:
How's that work exactly? Isn't that an oxymoron? You say you talk about what people "TELL" you, yet that's the same thing 2 sentences later you are saying that people should NOT take "he said/she said"???? :thinking: You're all over the map. Trying to baffle someone with bullshit are ya????
If you say a bunch of us don't understand you, then try and make yourself more clearly understood. Using half sentences, terrible spelling/grammar, and always using WHITE this and BLACK that will only lead people to think what they do now. If you don't care about that, then keep on keeping on. If you do want to be taken seriously in discussions, then heed the advice.
Any questions? ;)
TeeJay
11-06-2006, 09:35 AM
hot dayum, professor jaime broke it down for yall!!!!!
ShooterMcGavin
11-06-2006, 09:42 AM
amen! although i'm surprised he actually took the time to break it down for someone who probably won't give 2 shits...oh well, can't fault him for his effort :goodjob:
TRINI4LIFE
11-06-2006, 09:49 AM
You always seem to try and justify that you're not doing something, yet it ends up backfiring on you every time.
Let's take a look at your rebuttal post and let's highlight somethings, shall we? ;)
Exhibit A. Noone is telling you that you're right or wrong, people are telling you that you see things in black/white FIRST. THAT is a sign of racism. You can fall on your ass denying it, but it's true. The sooner you learn this concept, the sooner you will truly "learn" something. As you can see above, it's always COLORS with you, not just plain ole people. It's always "BLACK" people, or "WHITE" lady, or "WHITE" America...... :rolleyes: Yet you swear up and down YOU are not racist. Well, when I refer to someone I refer to them as a person, NOT a COLOR. If someone is an ass, COLOR doesn't and shouldn't matter.....they're an ASS, period. Not a WHITE BOY ASSHOLE. What's WHITE got to do with it??? ;) Get it? Probably not.
Exhibit B. There you go again with the colors and the races.
Exhibit C. Wonder WHAT exactly? If we have a particular smell or like certain foods or beat our kids......WHAT is it that you are "wondering about"? You want to learn someone's culture and background, you don't do it by insulting them and asking stupid ass questions like "what do WHITE people smell like....." That's stupid. You have a crappy way of expressing yourself if that's your way of thinking.
That's probably because they're racist thoughts. You are right though, most people don't think about things in the same terms you do. Thank God for small favors. :rolleyes:
Exhibit C. Maybe you SHOULD pick up a book and read some. Although I'm sure if it didn't agree with your view of life and the world, you'd call it slanted and "one sided". :rolleyes:
If you source of "research" into LIFE and it's experiences is IA......like Bill Engle (sp?) says, "theeerrreeessss your sign!!!......" :lmfao:
Then ask a question and leave the WHITE this and BLACK that OUT of it.
Exhibit D. Why does it have to be WHITE lady vs just plain ole lady. The message is the same. The WHITE part of the description is irrelevant. If she was BLACK or WHITE or GREEN, she is STILL someone whom you are babysitting/working for. The COLOR does NOT change that fact. Right? So why even bring it up IF you're not thinking in terms of COLOR????? It's just like when someone purposely says something that they KNOW will hurt someone else just to get a little "zinger" into a sentence. Divorces are a great example of that. Many things are said that are totally irrelevant to a divorce proceeding. They are said by one side merely to piss off the other.
What do you mean by "this" neighborhood? You mean a WHITE neighborhood, right? Again, what does COLOR/RACE have to do with it? Can you not convey your message without it? Then maybe you should learn to communicate better then.
Do you get it now? Probably not.
Yes, because you asking ignorant and senseless questions based solely on one central subject; COLOR/RACE.
I'm willing to bet that 99% of your threads have to do with one of three main subjects YOU obviously love: COLOR, RACE, and SEX.
Wanna bet? ;)
Yet you're always trying to tell people to take you seriously and that you're classy and that you're this and that you're that. If you want people to take you seriously, then don't act stupid. Learn to communicate in legible sentences and complete thoughts. Maybe then people will take you seriously. Until then, you're just irritating the hell out of quite a few people. I know you don't care, but that's the facts.
Final Exhibit, and then we'll let the jury decide. ;)
Again with the colors. You don't seem to see the same things other see in your posts. Even people that are polar opposites in so many ways AGREE on this. As I challenged above, I would be very surprised if someone took all the threads started by you and gave a report different than what many people have seen and told you. You don't want to believe it, fine.
BTW, you can't have it both ways. This is what I mean by learning to communicate more clearly.
In one sentence you say that what you preach is based on this that AND on "what others TELL you", right? So how can you conclude by saying that you want to broaden your horizons and not just take what "he said/she said"????? :thinking:
How's that work exactly? Isn't that an oxymoron? You say you talk about what people "TELL" you, yet that's the same thing 2 sentences later you are saying that people should NOT take "he said/she said"???? :thinking: You're all over the map. Trying to baffle someone with bullshit are ya????
If you say a bunch of us don't understand you, then try and make yourself more clearly understood. Using half sentences, terrible spelling/grammar, and always using WHITE this and BLACK that will only lead people to think what they do now. If you don't care about that, then keep on keeping on. If you do want to be taken seriously in discussions, then heed the advice.
Any questions? ;)
GEEEEEEZAN ages Dr. Quote
{X}Echo419
11-06-2006, 10:12 AM
wtf??? i dont get it when my friends say "dont get that perfume it smells like a white girl"
wtf does that mean?? perfume is perfume and if it smells good to me then thats just what i like.
like for instance...im currently house sitting and babysitting for this lady i know of. and im using their body wash ( which smells incredible) its like green tea and something. then i put my "love spell" lotion or perfume on from V.S and the a friend of mine came to visit me last nite and was like " dang you smell like a white girl now"
:thinking: i was like ...well what does that smell like? he said he doenst know how to describe it but white girls have a certain smell.
i dont know what hes talkin about? but whenever i hug my friends they either smell like perfume ( that smells good to me) or they smell like thier house just like any other person?
is there really a certain smell or are my friends just trippin??
I don't know what white girls smell like :???: . but I can tell you old azn people smell like fish sauce and rice. and for some reason they all have a bucket and big spoon in their showers :wtf: :ninja:
n2daizo123
11-06-2006, 10:13 AM
I had a black teacher in high school that said white people smell like wet dogs?? Never did under stand the reason for that comment though.
ShooterMcGavin
11-06-2006, 10:19 AM
^^^he was racise :goodjob:
n2daizo123
11-06-2006, 10:26 AM
It was a she and your probably right.
Sammich
11-06-2006, 10:28 AM
sometimes they do..its usually when they are in contact w/ water..
iloveboost
11-06-2006, 10:44 AM
Excellent points, Jaime.
It is a shame you spent all that effort on someone who will probably not heed a bit of advice you gave them. Although, the effort shouldn't go unrecognized.
If she can't see how ignorant and bias she is, nothing we type on here will change things. But again, good job on pointing out the obvious contradictions and laying it out plainly for all to see.
Jaimecbr900
11-06-2006, 01:06 PM
Thank you Teejay, Shag, boost, and BTL. :goodjob:
Nemesis
11-06-2006, 01:09 PM
A lot of asian people do have a certain aroma because of the type of traditional foods they eat and their ingredients.
I've never really paid attention to how white people smell but, according to Uncle Ruckus, they smell like lemon juice.
http://z.about.com/d/animatedtv/1/0/b/S/BoondocksUncle500.jpg
Jaimecbr900
11-06-2006, 01:22 PM
If this was ever even a half ass discussion, let's all be clear about something:
1. "Smell" is smell regardless of color/race.
2. Some people STINK because they don't have good hygiene, period.
3. Sometimes we associate a certain smell with a certain person, but make no mistake about it.....when that person finally bathes....he/she will smell exactly like the damn bar of soap they used. The "smell" will not stick to them.....if it does, refer to #2 above.
4. What the original poster's friends were referring to is a RACIST STEREOTYPE no different than some of the ones people have been throwing around in this thread as jokes. It is no more true than saying an Asian person smells like rice, or a Black person like chicken, or a Spanish person like tacos. It is a RACIST and stereotypical comment made by someone of little intelligence or knowledge.
5. More sensitive noses can definetly smell and differentiate between smells. Some can even tell you what some of the ingredients are merely from smelling. Dogs have 10x's the olfatory receptors that we do. Even DOGS can't "smell" a WHITE person vs a BLACK person. If I eat fried chicken right now, does that mean I'm going to smell like someone or do I just smell like fried chicken until I bathe? That's about as absurd as saying "WHITE" people smell one way and Black people smell another. EVERYBODY gives off a smell depending on their hygiene. That smell is not going to obviously point anyone unless you use an assumption.
ahmonrah
11-06-2006, 01:23 PM
DAMMIT JAIME! i read that and shiat!
Jaimecbr900
11-06-2006, 01:23 PM
A lot of asian people do have a certain aroma because of the type of traditional foods they eat and their ingredients.
That is exactly true, but it is only temporary.
As soon as they bathe, they smell like soap..... :D
You smelled like soap yesterday as a matter of fact.......and burnt tires.....and race fuel...... :D ;)
TRINI4LIFE
11-06-2006, 01:25 PM
If this was ever even a half ass discussion, let's all be clear about something:
1. "Smell" is smell regardless of color/race.
2. Some people STINK because they don't have good hygiene, period.
3. Sometimes we associate a certain smell with a certain person, but make no mistake about it.....when that person finally bathes....he/she will smell exactly like the damn bar of soap they used. The "smell" will not stick to them.....if it does, refer to #2 above.
4. What the original poster's friends were referring to is a RACIST STEREOTYPE no different than some of the ones people have been throwing around in this thread as jokes. It is no more true than saying an Asian person smells like rice, or a Black person like chicken, or a Spanish person like tacos. It is a RACIST and stereotypical comment made by someone of little intelligence or knowledge.
5. More sensitive noses can definetly smell and differentiate between smells. Some can even tell you what some of the ingredients are merely from smelling. Dogs have 10x's the olfatory receptors that we do. Even DOGS can't "smell" a WHITE person vs a BLACK person. If I eat fried chicken right now, does that mean I'm going to smell like someone or do I just smell like fried chicken until I bathe? That's about as absurd as saying "WHITE" people smell one way and Black people smell another. EVERYBODY gives off a smell depending on their hygiene. That smell is not going to obviously point anyone unless you use an assumption.
Brought back memories of Human Anatomy class.
Nemesis
11-06-2006, 01:26 PM
You smelled like soap yesterday as a matter of fact.......and burnt tires.....and race fuel...... :D ;)
LOL Im not sure whether to be flattered or scared :lmfao:
Jaimecbr900
11-06-2006, 01:33 PM
LOL Im not sure whether to be flattered or scared :lmfao:
:lmfao:
ShooterMcGavin
11-06-2006, 01:35 PM
SMELLS like a bunch of racise folks up in here :lmfao:
BluesClues
11-06-2006, 01:40 PM
SMELLS like a bunch of racise folks up in here :lmfao::werd:
racism rules, that is all...........
quickdodge®
11-06-2006, 02:12 PM
LOL Im not sure whether to be flattered or scared :lmfao:
I don't know, cuzz. That's some homo shit right there. I don't know how I'd react if some grown-ass brown dude walked up to my white-ass and was smelling all up on me. Later, (white)QD.
most of the time i smell like beef jerky. cant speak for eveybody though. :dunno:
BluesClues
11-06-2006, 02:26 PM
most of the time i smell like beef jerky. cant speak for eveybody though. :dunno:
No you don't. How are you on the comp? Are you at the shop?
No you don't. How are you on the comp? Are you at the shop?
passing through checking my email and printing out a few things.
BluesClues
11-06-2006, 02:29 PM
passing through checking my email and printing out a few things.
Cool. Sounds like a eventful day!
Cool. Sounds like a eventful day!
i guess.
holla at yawl bc im out. :burnout:
ISAtlanta300
11-06-2006, 03:25 PM
If this was ever even a half ass discussion, let's all be clear about something:
1. "Smell" is smell regardless of color/race.
2. Some people STINK because they don't have good hygiene, period.
3. Sometimes we associate a certain smell with a certain person, but make no mistake about it.....when that person finally bathes....he/she will smell exactly like the damn bar of soap they used. The "smell" will not stick to them.....if it does, refer to #2 above.
4. What the original poster's friends were referring to is a RACIST STEREOTYPE no different than some of the ones people have been throwing around in this thread as jokes. It is no more true than saying an Asian person smells like rice, or a Black person like chicken, or a Spanish person like tacos. It is a RACIST and stereotypical comment made by someone of little intelligence or knowledge.
5. More sensitive noses can definetly smell and differentiate between smells. Some can even tell you what some of the ingredients are merely from smelling. Dogs have 10x's the olfatory receptors that we do. Even DOGS can't "smell" a WHITE person vs a BLACK person. If I eat fried chicken right now, does that mean I'm going to smell like someone or do I just smell like fried chicken until I bathe? That's about as absurd as saying "WHITE" people smell one way and Black people smell another. EVERYBODY gives off a smell depending on their hygiene. That smell is not going to obviously point anyone unless you use an assumption.
PREACH IT, SON !!!
/end thread.
Jaimecbr900
11-06-2006, 03:42 PM
I don't know, cuzz. That's some homo shit right there. I don't know how I'd react if some grown-ass brown dude walked up to my white-ass and was smelling all up on me. Later, (white)QD.
:lmfao: :lmfao: :lmfao: :lmfao: Although....I'M not a homo, you WHITE dufus..... :taun:
Tasuki_Civic
11-06-2006, 03:51 PM
I had a black teacher in high school that said white people smell like wet dogs?? Never did under stand the reason for that comment though.
^^^he was racise :goodjob:
thats cause it was meant to be racsist. same way as black pple look like monkeys.
its funny how you guys are so quick to call pple ignorant and bias about things when you dont know anything about them. its kool w/me. no heart feelings.
you guys are acting like ive said all of this in my own words. i repeat what others tell me about this topic. so i asked you guys opinions lol which ive gotten alot. love it cause im bored anyway. but yea.....
most of the time i smell like beef jerky. cant speak for eveybody though. :dunno:
:yes: when you sweat you smell like chicken and curve cologne jesse.
p.s to those who might be offened by this thread. DONT BE....just talkin about things to by pass time that i know others has said to me. so dont be mad or flustered or whatever ya feel.
BTLFED
11-06-2006, 10:27 PM
Jaime Keeps it real.
Jaime: 13047899035
Tasuki: 0
And be clear, a 0 is just a 0. There is no color to it.
ShooterMcGavin
11-06-2006, 10:30 PM
^^^u sure? SOMEBODY TOLD ME that the concept of "0" was conceived by a white guy :devil: :lmao:
i4_garage
11-06-2006, 10:32 PM
white girls smelll goooooddddd
Hulud
11-06-2006, 10:33 PM
damn jaime, why you gotta post that shit right after i go into work lol
but, yea i agree it was a waste to write it to someone who says she isnt ignorant because we dont know her
ShooterMcGavin
11-06-2006, 10:36 PM
^^^that's like saying i don't see in 16:9 just cuz ppl on here don't know me personally :lmfao: facts are facts yo, regardless of who knows u and how doesn't :goodjob:
Hulud
11-06-2006, 10:40 PM
its funny how you guys are so quick to call pple ignorant and bias about things when you dont know anything about them.
we know what you post about.
i mean keep denying it all you want if it makes you happy, i guess.
ok look at me and jaime we never agree on anything (almost) but we agree on what you post and how you come across on here is racist. i mean its not like its one group of people saying this. not that you will listen to this anyways
C22H19N3O4
11-06-2006, 10:42 PM
says she isnt ignorant
Blame Sonny Perdue!!
TheSnail
11-06-2006, 10:45 PM
Last week my literature professor was trying to get some of the black kids to join the optional weekly meeting, so he said he would bring chicken and watermelon. LOL. The professor is black himself, but I thought it was still funny.
Hulud
11-06-2006, 10:45 PM
Blame Sonny Perdue!!
hahaha
Tasuki_Civic
11-07-2006, 01:12 AM
we know what you post about.
i mean keep denying it all you want if it makes you happy, i guess.
ok look at me and jaime we never agree on anything (almost) but we agree on what you post and how you come across on here is racist. i mean its not like its one group of people saying this. not that you will listen to this anyways
i mean hey ...with IA your damned if you do and you aint shit if you dont. IA is like high school. the newbies follow the pple who has been on here longer. the ones who have been here longer follow the ones that are the most popluar so they wont get picked on by everyone else who are followers.
im not a follower. and i ask what i please and say what i please just as anyone else. those who know me. know im not like that. so yea your right i wouldnt listen. ha cause i know me. but what i do find entertaining is the statment in bold is true and thats why this thread keeps goin. how could i get mad.
plus i know what i say on IA at all times. there are alot more pple on here that say worse or slip out and say some stuff and all i do is either talk or ask a question. lol might i add i asked a hell of a good one to get pples attention.
followers can think what you will. but leaders know how to approach someone to see what they're about. so fuck all those who dont agree. ;)
Tasuki_Civic
11-07-2006, 01:26 AM
you know whats funny is that pple have said some rude ass shit about white pple on this thread. and i havent seen one person really respond to it like it was just out right wrong. same thing with black pple or latinos. i was just sayin...i noticed things that america has covered their eyes too. you can always kidd yourself that you will be driving a bently in 2 months but when youl et reality hit. you know it will never happen. atleast not in 2 months.
i would love for all that bad stuff to be gone ...but its all new to me h ow open it is now. how black pple in florida call white pple cracker like its okay and how white pple call blk ppl nigga likes ok. and white pple to call white pple nigga. ( ive never heard a blk person call another blk person cracker) but at this moment the most hate i see right now or atleast the past couple of months is blk and white. "other" is just in the mix of everything. but blk and white has been going on since before everyone on IA was born.
just so happen to listen to documentries on pple about past lives WW1 and 2 and before then. its really interesting to know about the past and why things are the way they are now. upper calss pple use different racial slangs that most of us prolly dont even know of. its jsut interesting how it all still effects our lives. and i dont understand why is it so hard to talk about it without pple freaking out and gettin angry. ooooh you can :joke" about it even tho your serious but a simple conversation about something or topics pple start pointing fingers without having an actual understanding of it cuz they want to follow what society says and not looking into it on their own and thats all im doin.
looking into it on my own. even if it didnt cross my path on an everyday bases i would still like to know what pple think outside my both box "world".
but not just races even by gender there is a secret war. women vs women, men vs men, and men vs women ( and we know who wins that most of the time)
i take one subject at a time with certain pple. and i picked racsim to be with you guys because the oddsdont wieght out male vs female. that has to be with another group
Tasuki_Civic
11-07-2006, 01:35 AM
most of my responses they are serious to an extent...like pple sayin what they think i am ( i dont pay attention to casue id rather here what pple say about the topics i put out. rahter than stupid comments that makes the thread big for no reason. lol altho it is in the whores lounge.
i can take jokes and all that and if your eyes see me as something different by what i question and you dont understand what i say then by all means you have the right to feel that way. lol who am i to stop that. but you cannot judge me completely unless you know how i am. just like there are 2 sides to every story. you cant be bias about what you read all the time becasue there is always another story to go along with it and its up to you to decied what you believe if you give both sides a chance. only ignorance believes what they are always told and never thinks for themselves.
mind you. i dont tell all...... i only tell enough to give a person room to think for their own and make a statement that they believe or have heard from others.
ive already said what im not so theres no need to reapt that from this post further
Hulud
11-07-2006, 06:59 AM
i mean hey ...with IA your damned if you do and you aint shit if you dont. IA is like high school. the newbies follow the pple who has been on here longer. the ones who have been here longer follow the ones that are the most popluar so they wont get picked on by everyone else who are followers.
im not a follower. and i ask what i please and say what i please just as anyone else. those who know me. know im not like that. so yea your right i wouldnt listen. ha cause i know me. but what i do find entertaining is the statment in bold is true and thats why this thread keeps goin. how could i get mad.
plus i know what i say on IA at all times. there are alot more pple on here that say worse or slip out and say some stuff and all i do is either talk or ask a question. lol might i add i asked a hell of a good one to get pples attention.
followers can think what you will. but leaders know how to approach someone to see what they're about. so fuck all those who dont agree. ;)
so now people who have similiar ideas are just following? :lmfao:
ahmonrah
11-07-2006, 07:12 AM
i hate everyone equally, but i love all women...unless they weigh more than me, have more chin hair than me or used to be a man!!! also, as i said before.... when white people get wet, they smell funny and when blk people get wet, more likely than not they're on the way to the morgue. dont believe me ?? click here. it was raining this morning.... (http://www.myfoxatlanta.com/myfox/pages/Home/Detail?contentId=1408102&version=4&locale=EN-US&layoutCode=VSTY&pageId=1.1.1)
ahmonrah
11-07-2006, 07:12 AM
thought this thread was dead though....
ShooterMcGavin
11-07-2006, 08:51 AM
all i know is that reading tasuki's posts with her endless contradictions and her 2nd grade grammar and spelling makes my head hurt, especially in the mornings :goodjob:
iloveboost
11-07-2006, 09:10 AM
She doesn't have run-on sentences.. she has run-on paragraphs, LOL.
Nice way to cop out of the arguement.
You went from 'going on what people tell you' to 'everyone needs to think for themselves' and trying to weasel around all of the valid points brought up in this thread.
You say there's still racial discrimination in today's society?? No way! Go look in the mirror! It's because people like you and your feeble understanding. You can't understand that not everyone is going to be like you, or your sister, or your brother, or your mother.
This isn't even fun because you're inept to logic and reasoning and understanding.
ShooterMcGavin
11-07-2006, 09:29 AM
She doesn't have run-on sentences.. she has run-on paragraphs, LOL.
This isn't even fun because you're inept to logic and reasoning and understanding.
:lmfao: +1
BluesClues
11-07-2006, 09:35 AM
i hate everyone equally, but i love all women...unless they weigh more than me, have more chin hair than me or used to be a man!!! also, as i said before.... when white people get wet, they smell funny and when blk people get wet, more likely than not they're on the way to the morgue. dont believe me ?? click here. it was raining this morning.... (http://www.myfoxatlanta.com/myfox/pages/Home/Detail?contentId=1408102&version=4&locale=EN-US&layoutCode=VSTY&pageId=1.1.1)
That link is about a man shot and killed in Buckhead:thinking:
{X}Echo419
11-07-2006, 09:39 AM
liberals smell like pussy when it rains.....no wait they Always do. :2cents:
:lmfao: :lmfao: :lmfao:
That should get things going in a different direction :goodjob:
Jaimecbr900
11-07-2006, 10:44 AM
Wow!!! Spelling and Grammar are in fact your friends Tasuki...... :rolleyes: :screwy:
All that posting to basically say nothing. You went around your elbow to get to your ____ without saying anything coherent. How do you do that? Is that a learned skill or just naturally full crap?
Are you serious? Seriously. I honestly thought that I could learn something new from you. I've had very heated debates with a handful of people here. I can now honestly say that there is only 1 person on IA that is as closed minded as you. Keep it up and you may even supersede him. You can't even make a valid point in any of your rants. Just when you start to make one, you open wide and insert BOTH feet....and elbows.....and hands.....and anything else that may be sucked into the vortex created when you open the flood gates of your mind's wonders that have no cohetion or direction.
Whatever.
The ironic thing is that even amongst people who don't see eye to eye on many subjects......they totally AGREE on one.....which is probably the only positive thing your ramblings accomplish. So I guess that means I'm actually wrong. You did accomplish 1 thing I guess. :rolleyes:
BluesClues
11-07-2006, 10:47 AM
Wow!!! Spelling and Grammar are in fact your friends Tasuki...... :rolleyes: :screwy:
All that posting to basically say nothing. You went around your elbow to get to your ____ without saying anything coherent. How do you do that? Is that a learned skill or just naturally full crap?
Are you serious? Seriously. I honestly thought that I could learn something new from you. I've had very heated debates with a handful of people here. I can now honestly say that there is only 1 person on IA that is as closed minded as you. Keep it up and you may even supersede him. You can't even make a valid point in any of your rants. Just when you start to make one, you open wide and insert BOTH feet....and elbows.....and hands.....and anything else that may be sucked into the vortex created when you open the flood gates of your mind's wonders that have no cohetion or direction.
Whatever.
The ironic thing is that even amongst people who don't see eye to eye on many subjects......they totally AGREE on one.....which is probably the only positive thing your ramblings accomplish. So I guess that means I'm actually wrong. You did accomplish 1 thing I guess. :rolleyes:
http://www.clicksmilies.com/s0105/sprachlos/speechless-smiley-020.gif
Jaimecbr900
11-07-2006, 10:49 AM
you know whats funny is that pple have said some rude ass shit about white pple on this thread. and i havent seen one person really respond to it like it was just out right wrong. same thing with black pple or latinos. i was just sayin...i noticed things that america has covered their eyes too. you can always kidd yourself that you will be driving a bently in 2 months but when youl et reality hit. you know it will never happen. atleast not in 2 months.
i would love for all that bad stuff to be gone ...but its all new to me h ow open it is now. how black pple in florida call white pple cracker like its okay and how white pple call blk ppl nigga likes ok. and white pple to call white pple nigga. ( ive never heard a blk person call another blk person cracker) but at this moment the most hate i see right now or atleast the past couple of months is blk and white. "other" is just in the mix of everything. but blk and white has been going on since before everyone on IA was born.
just so happen to listen to documentries on pple about past lives WW1 and 2 and before then. its really interesting to know about the past and why things are the way they are now. upper calss pple use different racial slangs that most of us prolly dont even know of. its jsut interesting how it all still effects our lives. and i dont understand why is it so hard to talk about it without pple freaking out and gettin angry. ooooh you can :joke" about it even tho your serious but a simple conversation about something or topics pple start pointing fingers without having an actual understanding of it cuz they want to follow what society says and not looking into it on their own and thats all im doin.
looking into it on my own. even if it didnt cross my path on an everyday bases i would still like to know what pple think outside my both box "world".
but not just races even by gender there is a secret war. women vs women, men vs men, and men vs women ( and we know who wins that most of the time)
i take one subject at a time with certain pple. and i picked racsim to be with you guys because the oddsdont wieght out male vs female. that has to be with another group
Wow, just wow. :no:
BluesClues
11-07-2006, 10:51 AM
^^^ lol
Jaimecbr900
11-07-2006, 10:54 AM
^^^ lol
We can all highlight and put up disertations, but she's still not going to get it.....is she? :thinking:
Jaimecbr900
11-07-2006, 11:00 AM
you know whats funny is that pple have said some rude ass shit about white pple on this thread.
Starting with the title and the thread itself. :rolleyes:
and i havent seen one person really respond to it like it was just out right wrong.
Are you kidding? Everybody has said it's ridiculous. Some have joked. Some haven't. They all agree its a ridiculous assumption.
BTW, where in this entire thread have YOU said it was stupid and ignorant for your "friend" to even think that way???? :thinking:
iloveboost
11-07-2006, 11:01 AM
You could tattoo it on her forehead and she wouldn't get it.
BTLFED
11-07-2006, 05:10 PM
Jaime droppin truth like it ain't nothin! I would give you 1038947133 rep points if I could!
SPSUPatrick
11-07-2006, 05:31 PM
we smell like money!
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.2 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.