What would you do ...

[Julio]

This happen to a victim when the tsunamu hit.


If you are in the middle of a disaster like a tsunami, hurricane etc.

and you have 2 kids...

one is 11 the other is 9.

You are stuck in a life and death situation :

this situation is so screwed up, that you have to let one of your kids go in order to save the other. If you let yourself go and let the 2 kids wonder and try to survive, but remember there ages.. is crazy out there and they need an adult. So wich kid would you let go in order to save one...?

[Hulud]

This happen to a victim when the tsunamu hit.


If you are in the middle of a disaster like a tsunami, hurricane etc.

and you have 2 kids...

one is 11 the other is 9.

You are stuck in a life and death situation :

this situation is so screwed up, that you have to let one of your kids go in order to save the other. If you let yourself go and let the 2 kids wonder and try to survive, but remember there ages.. is crazy out there and they need an adult. So wich kid would you let go in order to save one...?
i dont think i could....

id rather us all go down knowing we went down as a family rather then sacrificing one of them when you never know you could save all of them

[gijoe0720]

This happen to a victim when the tsunamu hit.


If you are in the middle of a disaster like a tsunami, hurricane etc.

and you have 2 kids...

one is 11 the other is 9.

You are stuck in a life and death situation :

this situation is so screwed up, that you have to let one of your kids go in order to save the other. If you let yourself go and let the 2 kids wonder and try to survive, but remember there ages.. is crazy out there and they need an adult. So wich kid would you let go in order to save one...?

prolly let myself go so I die and then I wouldn't know what happened to them and have to live the rest of my life knowin I let one of my kids die.

[Scrappy]

myself.

[aaronfelipe]

myself.

[The Golden Child]

hard situation but i think i would rather go and pray my kids get out safe ..

[quickdodge®]

Reminds me of that movie, The Good Son with Macaulay Culkin. At the end, the Mother was holding her son, who was evil as fuck, in one hand and her deceased sister's son, who was on the bad end of the evil one. She was holding them falling over a cliff. They were slipping and she could save one of them. Later, QD.

[JustinSane110™]

Reminds me of that movie, The Good Son with Macaulay Culkin. At the end, the Mother was holding her son, who was evil as fuck, in one hand and her deceased sister's son, who was on the bad end of the evil one. She was holding them falling over a cliff. They were slipping and she could save one of them. Later, QD.
Damn, that's what it was. I remembered seeing a similar scenario before but couldn't remember the name of the movie. :goodjob:

[Hektik]

myself

[TIGERJC]

I would let both of them go!!!! I want to live

[Flip]

i dont think i could....

id rather us all go down knowing we went down as a family rather then sacrificing one of them when you never know you could save all of them

ditto

[Jimmy B]

myself...

[itsjustdee]

i'd die with them.

[SLOWLYbtngU]

Not saying that I would do this...BUT-If I let them both go and save myself can I not have more kids?

Other than that...I would prob let myself go...I think, at least right now.

[TRINI4LIFE]

I could not let any of them go. We all would try to make it out together or die trying.

[Wurm]

Id let both the kids go

its fair

[Nemesis]

Both my kids.


I can make more later LOL





wow that was bad :lmao:

[RandomGuy]

male/female kids?

lol damn i dont think i can answer the question on the real.... Hrm... well if it comes downnnnn to it and down to it... and you HAVE to make a choice, and "doing nothing" option is not available... I guess it'd be to save the boy to carry down your name/legacy. Also a girl around that age would be much harder to keep and accomodate. (given certain changes)

[The Ninja]

i'd let them both die, and then blame bush.


p.s. i don't like kids anywayz

[4dmin]

if you have to choose one i would save the weaker of the two... hopefully the stronger one will survive on their own ;)

[SwurvinIn]

i'd let them both die, and then blame bush.


p.s. i don't like kids anywayz
because it would indeed be bush's fault.....every natural disaster is his fault....impeeeeeeeech!!!!! hahahahaha

[Cato ED-6]

I'd probally try my best to save both but in the end die in order to save them.

[Ms Dollar]

if it all came down to it myself...

[civic95]

Drown them both, and use their bodies as flotation devices, nourishment, etc.

[StupidBikerBoy]

lol, some of these peeps obviously don't have kids.


Letting go wouldn't be an option for me.

[ahmonrah]

try to save both. but if that isnt an option, i'd spent my life telling the other child..."you were always my favorite..."

just kidding. i'm the type that will in that situation, lay down my life to save both.

[Leadfoot_mf]

i would save the one i like better......then hold it over his head for the rest of his life....like damn why didnt i save your brother.....

[Princess12]

I don't think I could live with myself if I let one of them go. If we were unable to make it out together, then I would go.

[Tiff-O-Bitties]

myself.

[redlinenprelude]

the older/strongest one, so i can sell him into slavery sooner.