PDA

View Full Version : Well the bridge is on its way



Julio
01-31-2006, 05:36 PM
from 316 on to 85 south.. Instead of merging from the left.. you will be going over 85 south and mergin to the right... easier to get off if you are going to Pleasant hill rd. ABOUT DAMN TIME!!
I can imagine already the great traffic in the mean time :rolleyes:
should be done in 2 years.

5thgcelica
01-31-2006, 05:38 PM
from 316 on to 85 south.. Instead of merging from the left.. you will be going over 85 south and mergin to the right... easier to get off if you are going to Pleasant hill rd. ABOUT DAMN TIME!!
I can imagine already the great traffic in the mean time :rolleyes:
should be done in 2 years.

hell yeah...i hate making that transistion across 85.

PhAtBoYMr2
01-31-2006, 05:38 PM
yeah man the traffic from 316 to 85 and vice versa can get ridiculous at times

Bishop
01-31-2006, 05:55 PM
good. I have seen soo many wrecks almost happen because that.

never_finished
01-31-2006, 05:56 PM
seriously...about time.

IndianStig
01-31-2006, 06:03 PM
WOW

that is so good
ill be coming from the 120 entrance trying to get into the left lane/hov at like 75 mph and the ppl coming from 316 will try to merge at like 55mph

not cool at all many accidents are just avoided

for the rest of the 2 years, if your coming down 316, then get up to about 70(a doable speed for everybody) and you will find changing lanes is alot easier






IMO, ppl who drive slow cause more accidents then those who drive fast (especially on th ehighway)

and speed does not cause a wreck, stupidity while speeding causes a wreck

collins
01-31-2006, 07:18 PM
IMO, ppl who drive slow cause more accidents then those who drive fast (especially on th ehighway)

and speed does not cause a wreck, stupidity while speeding causes a wreck
i couldnt've said it better myself!

Sibious
01-31-2006, 07:28 PM
really need to find faster ways to build these roads, adn bridges

Brett
01-31-2006, 07:28 PM
That shit needed to be done 10 fucking years ago, that on ramp is a death waiting to happen.

Julio
01-31-2006, 08:23 PM
WOW

that is so good
ill be coming from the 120 entrance trying to get into the left lane/hov at like 75 mph and the ppl coming from 316 will try to merge at like 55mph

not cool at all many accidents are just avoided

for the rest of the 2 years, if your coming down 316, then get up to about 70(a doable speed for everybody) and you will find changing lanes is alot easier






IMO, ppl who drive slow cause more accidents then those who drive fast (especially on th ehighway)

and speed does not cause a wreck, stupidity while speeding causes a wreck



Well since theres no HOV lane and if you know that intersection is there and is not to safe to be going fast, why dont you slow down?

2 jackasses dont make a good pudding. :rolleyes:

IndianStig
01-31-2006, 08:26 PM
Well since theres no HOV lane and if you know that intersection is there and is not to safe to be going fast, why dont you slow down?

2 jackasses dont make a good pudding. :rolleyes:


there is an HOV lane, it comes up very soon after that ramp comes on, to get to that lane you have to be with traffic (70-75)

the people coming from 316 are going at most 65 when they merge, 10mph is a huge difference to have to slow down for changing lane, i mean if worst comes to worst, then stay in right lanes and then stay in the middle of the freeway after passing most of the people frorm 316, hopefully fined a free spot and then merge, but then you get causght in more slow ppl and Pleasant hill traffic

problems with that junction:

316 entering on left
no entering HOV when its solid
traffic is still going about 75 on 85S v 60 for 316

Julio
01-31-2006, 08:31 PM
there is an HOV lane, it comes up very soon after that ramp comes on, to get to that lane you have to be with traffic (70-75)

the people coming from 316 are going at most 65 when they merge, 10mph is a huge difference to have to slow down for and avoid while chaningin lanes

problems with that junction:

316 entering on left
no entering HOV when its solid
traffic is still going about 75 on 85S v 60 for 316

I understand perfectly,, But why can't you slow down is what Im asking if you already know whats ahead?

Is easier to slow down coming down 85s as you aproach that area of congestion then trying to speed up with only 2 lanes going into one from to 316 to 85s ;)

IndianStig
01-31-2006, 08:34 PM
I understand perfectly,, But why can't you slow down is what Im asking if you already know whats ahead?

Is easier to slow down coming down 85s as you aproach that area of congestion then trying to speed up with only 2 lanes going into one from to 316 to 85s ;)

its just a really effed up junction

but most the people get by it okay

still that 2% that are mostly new drivers and women (lol, jp, asian women :lmfao: (jp AznTraitor)) would greatly benefit by changing the intersection