MY D700 HIGH ISO TEST!!!! HOLD YOUR JAW!!!!

[CHADbee]

:eek:

http://chadbeephotography.com/blog/2010/03/13/d700-high-iso-test-time/

[Revmaynard]

I don't know much about camera's, what's ISO mean....or do?

[CHADbee]

I don't know much about camera's, what's ISO mean....or do?

read....or attempt to read this.....lol

http://www.photoxels.com/tutorial_iso.html

[Revmaynard]

Gotcha, so that camera is pretty crazy then! LOL

[EJ_Allmota]

DAMN!!!!

[CHADbee]

DAMN!!!!

i said the same thing, outloud to myself when i got them on the screen. no noise reduction, nothing, just a resize.

[Tarzanman]

Underexpose it and then get back to us.

[CHADbee]

Underexpose it and then get back to us.

why force the camera to produce noise? i do under exposure shots all the time to use THAT exposure for the sky or background but im also shooting at ISO 200 on a tripod then. the only time this camera will see ISO levels this high is when it will be handheld and i wont be underexposing any shots so i dont see the point in it.

[boostedb16]

those look good chad. have you looked at some of the high iso shots on nikoncafe.com? there pretty bad ass on what this camera can do.

[CHADbee]

those look good chad. have you looked at some of the high iso shots on nikoncafe.com? there pretty bad ass on what this camera can do.

yeah i have.....thats what inspired me to do my own.

[G.C]

dam.....i think im retarted, cause it looks the same to me...:(

[Nerdsrock22]

Dang it. My d200 poops out around 800. That's so awesome.

[Tarzanman]

dam.....i think im retarted, cause it looks the same to me...:(

You're not retarded. The OP is trying to brag that his camera doesn't get a lot of noise at high ISO (which means that high ISO pictures look the same as low ISO pictures).... but its :gay: because its not difficult to reduce noise for a fairly well lit, properly exposed photograph.

A true test of how good the high ISO mode would be to bracket the exposure and compare the results since the challenge with low light photos is that you often have areas within the frame that require very different exposures.

[CHADbee]

Dang it. My d200 poops out around 800. That's so awesome.

yeah the d90 was alittle better....still useable around 1000 but at 1250 it was getting pretty bad.

[james]

why force the camera to produce noise?

don't mind the trolls.

[CHADbee]

You're not retarded. The OP is trying to brag that his camera doesn't get a lot of noise at high ISO (which means that high ISO pictures look the same as low ISO pictures).... but its :gay: because its not difficult to reduce noise for a fairly well lit, properly exposed photograph.

A true test of how good the high ISO mode would be to bracket the exposure and compare the results since the challenge with low light photos is that you often have areas within the frame that require very different exposures.

but i dont take under exposed photos lol thats like telling tiger woods "yeah you can swing that club pretty well but try to slam dunk this basketball!!!"

tiger woods plays mutha fuckin golf and fuckes bitches. i take properly exposed photos and fuck bitches.

anything besides what i use this camera for dont matter 2 dicks and a fried chicken leg in a sandbox to me. i dont 100% crop or under expose photos so there aint a damn point in doing it in the high ISO test.

[atlantamx3]

Nice, Chad!

My Sony a700 is the same way.

[CHADbee]

Nice, Chad!

My Sony a700 is the same way.

its nice to be able to put the ISO higher than 1K and not be nervous about it lol

[r0bb86]

tiger woods plays mutha fuckin golf and fuckes bitches. i take properly exposed photos and fuck bitches.

http://i595.photobucket.com/albums/tt31/therobb86/cbtiger.png

[CHADbee]

http://i595.photobucket.com/albums/tt31/therobb86/cbtiger.png

:lmao:

+31 and sigg'd!!!!