View Full Version : bmw X6 M
ATL_e92
01-06-2010, 12:00 PM
would you?
Nemesis
01-06-2010, 12:03 PM
as stupid as the Cayenne.
tuner_dude
01-06-2010, 12:04 PM
thats a tough one for $110k friend has one and its skeet skeet skeet... lol
Cool Cat Racing
01-06-2010, 12:05 PM
I wouldn't but I wouldn't buy a Cayenne Turbo S either. For those in the market for those kind of vehicles now have a good looking alternative with similar performance.
ATL_e92
01-06-2010, 12:05 PM
555hp sounds good to me for a suv!!!!!!!
On_Her_Face
01-06-2010, 12:10 PM
I like the 5-series GT better, but that isn't saying much either.
ATL_e92
01-06-2010, 12:14 PM
i think the only reason i like it is cause it looks like a 335! on steroids!!!!
Elbow
01-06-2010, 12:53 PM
FUCK NO. I would never spend over 10k on any BMW unless it was a purpose built race car.
Njobe
01-06-2010, 12:59 PM
i saw this shit in person about 2 months ago, some older guy was driving. looks pretty sick in person. i would get it and then sell it :D (if i was given it for free)
ATL_e92
01-06-2010, 01:12 PM
i saw this shit in person about 2 months ago, some older guy was driving. looks pretty sick in person. i would get it and then sell it :D (if i was given it for free)
lol, and what would trade it for?
sprix!
01-06-2010, 01:32 PM
It actually looks great. But for the money, I could think of several other options.
©hris
01-06-2010, 01:34 PM
i sure would
LordZed
01-06-2010, 01:41 PM
It actually looks great. But for the money, I could think of several other options.
I have to agree. The concept, power, and look are fine to me. The price says I could own a Corvette and a Tahoe and get the best of both worlds that way. Plus I could take the Tahoe camping. Im not taking that X6 off road! (Lest it be for gravel rally fun)
ATL_e92
01-06-2010, 01:44 PM
whats better then the x6 M thats a suv? i know i you could get a car but i want a fast suv.
LordZed
01-06-2010, 01:46 PM
whats better then the x6 M thats a suv? i know i you could get a car but i want a fast suv.
The SRT-8 is less money and probably comparibly as fast.
©hris
01-06-2010, 01:52 PM
The SRT-8 is less money and probably comparibly as fast.
define fast.... put the SRT-8 up against the X6 in a series of test....
drag race, auto-x, road course, 0-60, 60-100, 100-0, dependability, options, safety, etc....
its prob worth the money.... hell the 7-series is up there in that price range as well
CHADbee
01-06-2010, 01:52 PM
i wonder why they used flash in the first picture to light the grill, front bumper and front tire tread but didnt use it in the other pictures :thinking:
ATL_e92
01-06-2010, 01:57 PM
sorry but the srt8 jeep is slow against the x6 M!!!
tinkolby_25
01-06-2010, 02:28 PM
hell no has nobody seen the new top gear? its the worst car ever. lol
On_Her_Face
01-06-2010, 02:58 PM
SRT-8 Jeep
Power: 425/420
0-60: 4.7
60-0: 125 Feet
1/4: 13.4@102
.84G Skidpad
BMW X6M
Power: 555/500
0-60: 4.5
60-0: 107 Feet
.91G Skidpad
The performance is very comparable but at what cost?
©hris
01-06-2010, 03:27 PM
btw... its $86,000 not $110,000
jhadleyh
01-06-2010, 03:28 PM
Id rather have the srt-8 jeep
Elbow
01-06-2010, 03:30 PM
I'd rather have a base Porsche SUV then a BMW M SUV any day.
Mantooth
01-06-2010, 04:55 PM
Either the Cayenne Turbo S or the ML63. I, personally, wouldn't pay $60k for the X6 unless I could mod it and / or resale it. It's Not the most attractive SUV out there.:2cents:
Atlblkz06
01-06-2010, 05:09 PM
Its an SUV - so NO lol.
RL...
01-06-2010, 05:13 PM
.....I'd buy an audi r8 with that much $$$
On_Her_Face
01-06-2010, 05:20 PM
I'd rather have a base Porsche SUV then a BMW M SUV any day.
My girlfriend has one of those and you are wrong sir in any aspect.
2006 Porsche Cayenne
Weight: 4,762 (curb)
Power: 247hp
Power to weight ratio: .05hp/lb.
RL...
01-06-2010, 05:23 PM
My girlfriend has one of those and you are wrong sir in any aspect.
2006 Porsche Cayenne
Weight: 4,762 (curb)
Power: 247hp
Power to weight ratio: .05hp/lb.
If you want a fast suv i think the trailblazer ss would be a better deal. You can get them for about 20k now.
.blank cd
01-06-2010, 05:27 PM
i wonder why they used flash in the first picture to light the grill, front bumper and front tire tread but didnt use it in the other pictures :thinking:
Looks like the house is blocking the sun where it sits in the first pic, the other ones are head on
On_Her_Face
01-06-2010, 05:28 PM
If you want a fast suv i think the trailblazer ss would be a better deal. You can get them for about 20k now.
True and LSX are cheap to mod!
thegovanator
01-06-2010, 05:48 PM
No means no
SampaGuy
01-06-2010, 05:57 PM
I like the 5-series GT better.
:upchuck::upchuck::upchuck:
OnURleft
01-06-2010, 06:32 PM
NO I would not, mainly because it looks like ass. Sorry BMW failed on that cars design as hard as Porsche did with a Panamera..
However, I would do....
X5 M
ML63
Range Rover Supercharged (none-sport, 510hp version)
Sorry, if you want a fast S.U.V I wouldn't do a Porsche because they have to much offroading bullshit preventing it from being able to dance like the BMW's. They are soft and heavy for their size. At least the Range Rover can properly offroad, go fast, brake fast and not turn. The Cayenne is a bad combination, plus they break constantly (worked in a Porsche shop).
They BMW is a realistic approach because it lacks lots of heavy offroading equipment, which is why its simplier a sportier S.U.V then the Porsche.
The trailblazer SS and SRT-8 Jeep are great bang for the buck, but when you pay rental car like prices you get rental car like technology and quality. No double clutch 7 speed, rev matching, launch control gear box in the Jeep, and it traps 10mph slower in the 1/4 and I won't event alk road course. Modded it is comparable straight line (of course), but the new X5 M is seriously fast everywhere stock (wait until software comes out). The trailblazer was outdated when it came out, with it's 4-speed auto and pre-bankrupt GM interior but oh, it does love the 1/4 mile once modded!!
Here's a X6 M wallowing around Road Atlanta, supposedly touched 145 range on the back straight.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qLW8SYN1IyA
chameleon30038
01-06-2010, 10:19 PM
if it was given to me ... then hellS YeaH
CHADbee
01-06-2010, 10:25 PM
Looks like the house is blocking the sun where it sits in the first pic, the other ones are head on
lol i cant believe i got a reply to that post lol
from the way the shadow is on the ground it looks like the natural light was come from the back passenger quarter....and they used strobe for flash fill but then didnt use it in the other shots :thinking:
x Resilience
01-06-2010, 10:28 PM
If I had a family and money out the ass I would. It would make a perfect family car.
sTeadFasT
01-06-2010, 10:31 PM
This car really has no purpose. I'd either take a high performance sedan as a family car, or buy a car that is actually meant for the offroads because the X6 isn't really good for either.
Jecht
01-06-2010, 10:56 PM
Go watch the latest Top Gear. I'm pretty sure anyone who watches it will say this isn't a very good car.
ATL_e92
01-06-2010, 11:43 PM
btw... its $86,000 not $110,000
thats the starting price, fully loaded comes out to $110,000
On_Her_Face
01-07-2010, 12:05 AM
thats the starting price, fully loaded comes out to $110,000
Yep and everything is an option on a BMW.
ThE_EnD
01-07-2010, 12:45 AM
looks like a lifted car. not worth the money to me. but its still a BMW
Alan®
01-07-2010, 01:14 AM
Go watch the latest Top Gear. I'm pretty sure anyone who watches it will say this isn't a very good car.
Not a fair assessment. They drove the diesel not the M.
Humphrizzle
01-07-2010, 01:18 AM
pointless car
ATL_e92
01-07-2010, 06:40 PM
pointless car
tell me why this car is pointless?
Brian*
01-07-2010, 07:32 PM
fucking fuck no...
Hondatwin23
01-07-2010, 07:38 PM
reminds me of high end dunk
VooDooXII
01-07-2010, 10:21 PM
They're $110,000? Good gawd.
For some reason though, weird and pointless as it is, I really like this car/truck/pretentious and smug marketing term.
LENG-EG6
01-07-2010, 11:50 PM
LOVE IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
VooDooXII
01-08-2010, 03:43 AM
define fast.... put the SRT-8 up against the X6 in a series of test....
drag race, auto-x, road course, 0-60, 60-100, 100-0, dependability, options, safety, etc....
its prob worth the money.... hell the 7-series is up there in that price range as well
Now that you bring that up, I'd much rather have a 7-series.
Humphrizzle
01-08-2010, 05:11 AM
tell me why this car is pointless?
not worth the money, the m5 is more of a car and does the same thing..
it's a pointless SUV (like most SUV's are) and is very very very overpriced..
big motor, lots of power, for what reason?
bdydrpdmazda
01-08-2010, 05:35 AM
do not want...
JDMJAYDC2
01-08-2010, 03:04 PM
i love this car my sister has the top of the line x6 before this car came out i love it.
©hris
01-08-2010, 04:18 PM
not worth the money, the m5 is more of a car and does the same thing..
it's a pointless SUV (like most SUV's are) and is very very very overpriced..
big motor, lots of power, for what reason?
take an M5 off-road side by side with the X6 and see who wins hehe....
see which car fits the most luggage.... most head room... how many midgets can fit into both... see which car handles better up north where it snows 70+ days a year....
for people like us in the southern US i can see this as being a pointless SUV BUT.... think about all of the other countries in the world living in mountainous terrain, sub-freezing temps.... etc...
not all rich people live in the flat tropical parts of the world.
VooDooXII
01-08-2010, 05:00 PM
I thought this was no good off road. The X5 really isn't that great either.
Fast Shadow
01-09-2010, 01:30 AM
major gay
EJ25RUN
01-09-2010, 01:46 AM
Cayenne GTS 6 speed.
That is a real driver suv if there is such a thing.
Humphrizzle
01-09-2010, 02:43 AM
take an M5 off-road side by side with the X6 and see who wins hehe....
see which car fits the most luggage.... most head room... how many midgets can fit into both... see which car handles better up north where it snows 70+ days a year....
for people like us in the southern US i can see this as being a pointless SUV BUT.... think about all of the other countries in the world living in mountainous terrain, sub-freezing temps.... etc...
not all rich people live in the flat tropical parts of the world.
it's rear wheel drive.. it doesnt do well off road. and if you want something you can fit more luggage in, get a touring wagon..
Elbow
01-09-2010, 09:53 AM
Just watched the Top Gear on the X6...LMFAO.
Mk3 VR6
01-09-2010, 12:53 PM
i thinks it looks ugly. but its performs well.. but i wouldnt
1SICKLEX
01-10-2010, 05:34 PM
Cayenne GTS 6 speed.
That is a real driver suv if there is such a thing.
That is my fav SUV.......when the time comes for a SUV it will be the main contender....
VooDooXII
01-10-2010, 09:27 PM
The Range Rover and the Volkswagen Touareg V10 TDI are about the only two SUVs I'd consider buying.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.2 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.