Need a reputable car transporter ASAP!!

[SmackedInATL]

Anyone know of a reputable company that uses enclosed trailers? I need my Mustang shipped to Dallas, TX ASAP for a fair price. Please help if you have experience with anyone in this business.

[thecrazyone]

i found this...looks promising

quick and easy (lmgtfy.com/?q=car+transporters)

[SmackedInATL]

i found this...looks promising

quick and easy (http://lmgtfy.com/?q=car+transporters)

Bitch get the fuck out of here. You are a pussy.

[thecrazyone]

sweet dudeeeee

[thecrazyone]

im and bitch and a pussy like zoinks scoooob

[thecrazyone]

simple question...what would happen to someone who gets shot through the lung and heart?

[oneSLOWex]

glws

[thecrazyone]

A scientific method seeks to explain the events of nature in a reproducible way, and to use these reproductions to make useful predictions. It is done through observation of natural phenomena, and/or through experimentation that tries to simulate natural events under controlled conditions. It provides an objective process to find solutions to problems in a number of scientific and technological fields.[11]

Based on observations of a phenomenon, a scientist may generate a model. This is an attempt to describe or depict the phenomenon in terms of a logical physical or mathematical representation. As empirical evidence is gathered, a scientist can suggest a hypothesis to explain the phenomenon. This description can be used to make predictions that are testable by experiment or observation using scientific method. When a hypothesis proves unsatisfactory, it is either modified or discarded.
Personification of "Science" in front of the Boston Public Library

While performing experiments, scientists may have a preference for one outcome over another, and it is important to ensure that this tendency does not bias their interpretation.[12][13] A strict following of a scientific method attempts to minimize the influence of a scientist's bias on the outcome of an experiment. This can be achieved by correct experimental design, and a thorough peer review of the experimental results as well as conclusions of a study.[14][15] After the results of an experiment are announced or published, it is normal practice for independent researchers to double-check how the research was performed, and to follow up by performing similar experiments to determine how dependable the results might be.[16]

Once a hypothesis has survived testing, it may become adopted into the framework of a scientific theory. This is a logically reasoned, self-consistent model or framework for describing the behavior of certain natural phenomena. A theory typically describes the behavior of much broader sets of phenomena than a hypothesis—commonly, a large number of hypotheses can be logically bound together by a single theory. These broader theories may be formulated using principles such as parsimony (traditionally known as "Occam's Razor"). They are then repeatedly tested by analyzing how the collected evidence (facts) compares to the theory. When a theory survives a sufficiently large number of empirical observations, it then becomes a scientific generalization that can be taken as fully verified.

Unlike a mathematical proof, a scientific theory is empirical, and is always open to falsification if new evidence is presented. Even the most basic and fundamental theories may turn out to be imperfect if new observations are inconsistent with them. Critical to this process is making every relevant aspect of research publicly available, which allows ongoing review and repeating of experiments and observations by multiple researchers operating independently of one another. Only by fulfilling these expectations can it be determined how reliable the experimental results are for potential use by others.A scientific method seeks to explain the events of nature in a reproducible way, and to use these reproductions to make useful predictions. It is done through observation of natural phenomena, and/or through experimentation that tries to simulate natural events under controlled conditions. It provides an objective process to find solutions to problems in a number of scientific and technological fields.[11]

Based on observations of a phenomenon, a scientist may generate a model. This is an attempt to describe or depict the phenomenon in terms of a logical physical or mathematical representation. As empirical evidence is gathered, a scientist can suggest a hypothesis to explain the phenomenon. This description can be used to make predictions that are testable by experiment or observation using scientific method. When a hypothesis proves unsatisfactory, it is either modified or discarded.
Personification of "Science" in front of the Boston Public Library

While performing experiments, scientists may have a preference for one outcome over another, and it is important to ensure that this tendency does not bias their interpretation.[12][13] A strict following of a scientific method attempts to minimize the influence of a scientist's bias on the outcome of an experiment. This can be achieved by correct experimental design, and a thorough peer review of the experimental results as well as conclusions of a study.[14][15] After the results of an experiment are announced or published, it is normal practice for independent researchers to double-check how the research was performed, and to follow up by performing similar experiments to determine how dependable the results might be.[16]

Once a hypothesis has survived testing, it may become adopted into the framework of a scientific theory. This is a logically reasoned, self-consistent model or framework for describing the behavior of certain natural phenomena. A theory typically describes the behavior of much broader sets of phenomena than a hypothesis—commonly, a large number of hypotheses can be logically bound together by a single theory. These broader theories may be formulated using principles such as parsimony (traditionally known as "Occam's Razor"). They are then repeatedly tested by analyzing how the collected evidence (facts) compares to the theory. When a theory survives a sufficiently large number of empirical observations, it then becomes a scientific generalization that can be taken as fully verified.

Unlike a mathematical proof, a scientific theory is empirical, and is always open to falsification if new evidence is presented. Even the most basic and fundamental theories may turn out to be imperfect if new observations are inconsistent with them. Critical to this process is making every relevant aspect of research publicly available, which allows ongoing review and repeating of experiments and observations by multiple researchers operating independently of one another. Only by fulfilling these expectations can it be determined how reliable the experimental results are for potential use by others.

[thecrazyone]

The philosophy of science seeks to understand the nature and justification of scientific knowledge. It has proven difficult to provide a definitive account of scientific method that can decisively serve to distinguish science from non-science. Thus there are legitimate arguments about exactly where the borders are, which is known as the problem of demarcation. There is nonetheless a set of core precepts that have broad consensus among published philosophers of science and within the scientific community at large. For example, it is universally agreed that scientific hypotheses and theories must be capable of being independently tested and verified by other scientists in order to become accepted by the scientific community.

There are different schools of thought in the philosophy of scientific method. Methodological naturalism maintains that scientific investigation must adhere to empirical study and independent verification as a process for properly developing and evaluating natural explanations for observable phenomena.[30] Methodological naturalism, therefore, rejects supernatural explanations, arguments from authority and biased observational studies. Critical rationalism instead holds that unbiased observation is not possible and a demarcation between natural and supernatural explanations is arbitrary; it instead proposes falsifiability as the landmark of empirical theories and falsification as the universal empirical method. Critical rationalism argues for the ability of science to increase the scope of testable knowledge, but at the same time against its authority, by emphasizing its inherent fallibility. It proposes that science should be content with the rational elimination of errors in its theories, not in seeking for their verification (such as claiming certain or probable proof or disproof; both the proposal and falsification of a theory are only of methodological, conjectural, and tentative character in critical rationalism).[31] Instrumentalism rejects the concept of truth and emphasizes merely the utility of theories as instruments for explaining and predicting phenomena.[32]

Another aspect is that philosophy is at least implicitly at the core of every decision made. The schools of philosophical thought determine what is a necessity for scientific inquiry to take place.[33] For instance, there are basic philosophical assumptions implicit at the foundation of science - namely, 1) that reality is objective and consistent, 2) that humans have the capacity to perceive reality accurately, and 3) that rational explanations exist for elements of the real world. These assumptions are based in naturalism, critical rationalism, and instrumentalism, within which science is done.[33] Biologist Stephen J. Gould maintained that certain philosophical propositions--i.e., 1) Uniformity of law and 2) uniformity of processes across time and space--must first be assumed before you can proceed as a scientist doing science. Gould summarized this view as follows: "You cannot go to a rocky outcrop and observe either the constancy of nature's laws nor the working of unknown processes. It works the other way around." You first assume these propositions and "then you go to the out crop of rock."[34]

[TIGERJC]

contact evolunchbox or evo 2.3 since I believe they ship their cars almost every year to OHIO

[94ej2]

gl

[Stol3n]

Aaron, have you talked to Todd yet? He is a sponsor on MCE.

Here is his rig.

http://i197.photobucket.com/albums/aa60/mattvette/star1.jpg

Here is his website.

http://www.sho-tyme.com/

Some of the things he's hauled.

http://www.musclecar-evolution.com/forums/showthread.php?t=16203

http://www.musclecar-evolution.com/forums/showthread.php?t=12870

http://www.musclecar-evolution.com/forums/showthread.php?t=14677

[quickdodge®]

Lolol. Later, QD.

[SmackedInATL]

Todd cannot help me for 2 weeks. I need this car picked up next week.

[quickdodge®]

U-Haul has one for $55/day. Three days and $165 later, there you go. Later, QD.

[Stol3n]

Todd cannot help me for 2 weeks. I need this car picked up next week.

I see.

[SmackedInATL]

QD GTFO.

[quickdodge®]

SIATL STFU.

Lolol. Later, QD.

[roxie911]

If you find something...let me know. Gotta get a miura transported from California :(

[SleeperWRX]

QD GTFO.


Lol, why not get the uhaul? find a truck and do it yourself. Alot cheaper.

[quickdodge®]

Lol, why not get the uhaul? find a truck and do it yourself. Alot cheaper.

Some folks just aren't down with reason, man. Lolol. They'd just rather harbor an unfounded hate for someone they've never met. It's all good. Not like him posting GTFO will actually make me do that, lolol. Later, QD.

[SmackedInATL]

Because it isn't my concern. The buyer is paying.

[Stormhammer]

If you find something...let me know. Gotta get a miura transported from California :(

I can help you with that one, only it's more of a personal friend out in the midwest who would drive out there, dually and trailer, pick it up, and haul it back.

[quickdodge®]

Because it isn't my concern. The buyer is paying.

Seem like it would have been easier just to say that instead of the other. Later, QD.

[quickdodge®]

Will you be my friend, Smacked? Lolol. Later, QD.

[SleeperWRX]

Because it isn't my concern. The buyer is paying.


Then why not drive it to him and tell him you spent alot and he gives you that much lol.

Or make the fucker pick it up.

[cjhutch]

About 6 years ago I used DAS to ship a car from Canada to here. It was in an enclosed trailer once it crossed the border and was delivered on time without a scratch. Their prices are a little higher than some of the others, but I don't have any experience with other companies as far as enclosed trailers. In general I think most companies charge an extra $150-$300 for enclosed trailers.

[88NaCivic]

PM sent SmackedInATL

[SmackedInATL]

Will you be my friend, Smacked? Lolol. Later, QD.

No, GTFO.

[quickdodge®]

No, GTFO.

Damn, man. Out of all the folks on here that don't want to be friends with me, you're refusal hurts me most.

Lolol. Nah, but I'm cool. I don't know why your hate for me runs so deep (being that we've met), but it definitely is NOT reciprocated. Later, QD.

[ironchef]

Check out Intercity Lines.

http://www.intercitylines.com/

Used them before many times, they were always excellent.

Ask for Brandy, if she's still there.

[quickdodge®]

Ask for Brandy, if she's still there.

She'll be the fine girl. A good wife she would be. Even if your life, your lover or your lady were the sea. Later, QD.

[ironchef]

She'll be the fine girl. A good wife she would be. Even if your life, your lover or your lady were the sea. Later, QD.She sounds totally fine on the phone.

[NoWAyItZTOMmY]

yo smacked, post it on uship.com. its like ebay for shipping stuff. you will get a bunch of offers and pick the one you like.

[SmackedInATL]

Lock this please.

[quickdodge®]

I'll get it ASAP!!! Friend. Later, QD.