PDA

View Full Version : I lost to a 5.0 :)



Turbodude06
08-05-2009, 11:19 AM
Ok so this happened about two weeks ago on a sat. night... Me and a buddy of mine were going to the local car hangout(barrett). So we got on the highway and as soon as I get over into the fast lane I see this mustang come flyin up on me... I didn't think nothing of it, so I passed a couple of cars and got over for him to pass me... Well when I got over he pulled up next to me and just stayed there, while trying to get me to race him... First off im not the type to just not race someone, I don't care what car it is, i dont mind loosing at all.... So I hear him drop into 4th, so I droped into 4th as well.... So he hit it and I looked down and we weren't goin that fast so I went to 3rd and we stayed right next to each other for a good 10-12 sec. until I came up on a truck(don't know mph)... So me and my buddy just looked at each other like WTF? I just figured he'd walk me.... So i got behind him in the fast lane and we passed the semi-truck and then I got next to him again and now I had to convince him to race me, cause he didn't want to again... So after riding next to him for awhile I hear him drop 4th, so we slowed down to like 50-55mph. I hear him drop into 3rd this time, as I did too, and I honked 3 times... So we took off both in 3rd this time and from about 55-105 he got me by about 2 maybe 3 cars... I was pretty happy just a stock :cry: (SOHC)F22b1, with intake, exhaust, and a VAFC:cheers:..... Idk what was done to the 5.0 it was pretty nice(white) and all I know is it had exhaust and 5 speed..... I thought a 5.0 would have beat the single cam a little better, idk what do u guys think?????

jdm eg99
08-05-2009, 11:32 AM
im sorry !

Terror
08-05-2009, 11:36 AM
Those older 5.0's usually arent that fast with just bolt ons... they need alot of help.

Turbodude06
08-05-2009, 11:39 AM
Those older 5.0's usually arent that fast with just bolt ons... they need alot of help.

oh ok I thought it would have been faster idk, i thought it was funny cause i'm just a stock single cam.....

D3UC3S
08-05-2009, 11:39 AM
yeah older 5.0's if they are on stock gears just make alot of noise after 85mph....good run for a SOHC

Terror
08-05-2009, 11:41 AM
oh ok I thought it would have been faster idk, i thought it was funny cause i'm just a stock single cam.....


Hahaha yes, those cars are VERY deceiving... usually they are just loud.

If they are well put together, then they get get up and go.

but with just and intake and exhaust..... :no:

no dice.

Turbodude06
08-05-2009, 11:46 AM
Hahaha yes, those cars are VERY deceiving... usually they are just loud.

If they are well put together, then they get get up and go.

but with just and intake and exhaust..... :no:

no dice.

Damn I was happy for my little motor.....

RUFFIAN
08-05-2009, 11:54 AM
5.0 = light to light killer. they run out of gearing and breath after that.

NEMO
08-05-2009, 11:56 AM
yeah stock 5.0 with bolt ons only run low 14s at the track

Turbodude06
08-05-2009, 12:07 PM
yeah stock 5.0 with bolt ons only run low 14s at the track\

well mines about 17's lol:lmfao:

AnthonyF
08-05-2009, 12:11 PM
Stock 5.0's make very little power until the later models but then they didn't make that much.

-Ant.

89FOXBODY
08-05-2009, 01:12 PM
yeah 87-88 didnt have maf i dont believe(dont quote me on it) they had dense air or someting then in 89 they swapped to maf and mine with exhaust and underdrive pullies should have been in the 13s but due to traction issuses ran 14s at the track...on the street though it was stout... but there are still slow ones we bet one in a 1500 silverado from a dig one night quite funny...good job :goodjob:

WTF?
08-05-2009, 01:18 PM
oh ok I thought it would have been faster idk, i thought it was funny cause i'm just a stock single cam..... oh come on you know how slow those ponies are :lmfao:

collins
08-05-2009, 01:22 PM
oh ok I thought it would have been faster idk, i thought it was funny cause i'm just a stock single cam.....
nah, not very fast... they sound mean as fuck tho!

Drummerboy
08-05-2009, 01:33 PM
Its a good feeling when you hand somebody their rear in a single cam.

You should boost, it's a crazy difference. At 8psi i doubled my hp.

collins
08-05-2009, 01:37 PM
Its a good feeling when you hand somebody their rear in a single cam.

You should boost, it's a crazy difference. At 8psi i doubled my hp.
well, when you're only running about 110whp to start with....

LOL i'm kidding. either way thats a good gain with only 8psi. it would take me about 10psi or so... maybe a LITTLE more... to double mine :cheers:

Drummerboy
08-05-2009, 01:46 PM
well, when you're only running about 110whp to start with....

LOL i'm kidding. either way thats a good gain with only 8psi. it would take me about 10psi or so... maybe a LITTLE more... to double mine :cheers:

130, thank you very much! :tongue1:


But still, 130hp gain isn't anything to sneeze at. And im on 12psi now, I just have to figure out where my freakin massive boost leak is....

Tech5
08-05-2009, 02:38 PM
VIDS or it never happen!

AnthonyF
08-05-2009, 02:52 PM
power:weight is where it's at. :goodjob:

-Ant.

SX-MAN
08-05-2009, 02:56 PM
305 specifications
305 ci 9.1:1 220hp@4200rpm 275 lb/ft @ 3200rpm

not bad to have a 115 hp less.........
ive made a couple 5.0 owners upset too.....:goodjob:

QKJUICEDPONY
08-05-2009, 03:05 PM
yeah stock 5.0 with bolt ons only run low 14s at the track

True Fucking Story

89FOXBODY
08-05-2009, 03:09 PM
^ clean 4 eye not to fond of that bodystyle but yours is clean...

QKJUICEDPONY
08-05-2009, 03:12 PM
Thanks....If it was just as fast as one of those single cam hondas....FML

Tech5
08-05-2009, 04:45 PM
lololol

ranger250x
08-05-2009, 04:55 PM
when my '88 was stock i thought it was the shit. Lost a lot of races then, i got humbled by a turbo volvo STATION WAGON. wouldnt have been so bad if the dude took the car seat out it.

David88vert
08-05-2009, 05:04 PM
Someday my foxbody will be as fast as a single cam Civic.....

MrSVT
08-05-2009, 05:14 PM
I beat an also f22 accord the other day with all bolt ons and intake on his car with my piece of shit 1.5 del slow...people say it's the driver?

Anyways when 5.0's come nxt to my ricey del sol and take off they are quick as shit...

One_Bad_SHO
08-05-2009, 05:32 PM
5.sl0w

KDM>JDM
08-05-2009, 07:36 PM
yeah 87-88 didnt have maf i dont believe(dont quote me on it) they had dense air or someting then in 89 they swapped to maf and mine with exhaust and underdrive pullies should have been in the 13s but due to traction issuses ran 14s at the track...on the street though it was stout... but there are still slow ones we bet one in a 1500 silverado from a dig one night quite funny...good job :goodjob:

Good times for 200k miles the the ole truck runs damn good

joshk5145
08-05-2009, 08:07 PM
ford 5.0= 302...........
chevy 5.0 is a 305 right?........ just a little difference in the stats there not that it really matters. man i miss my accord

Lankhoss
08-05-2009, 08:11 PM
ford 5.0= 302...........
chevy 5.0 is a 305 right?........ just a little difference in the stats there not that it really matters. man i miss my accord

Yes as far as the size of each company's 5.0, no as to them being similar. The 302 is built much differently than the 305 and has a lot more potential. The 305 is basically a truck motor with good low end torque, but no high RPM horsepower, and it revs about 2 grand lower than a 302 does.

Starrfire
08-05-2009, 08:19 PM
Yeah those mustangs of those years including the Cobra's, are all slow. But several of my neighbors have very mean ones, low 11 sec cars at the track, but down the road they all got destroyed by turbo 4 bangers from around here.

joshk5145
08-05-2009, 08:37 PM
my buddys got a 5.0 makin around 375 on motor. it's pretty stout.... but theres a guy on the other side of town with a 91 that has a built 598 c.i. motor in it with the 5.0 emblems still on it and i think it makes bout 9?? on motor and 13?? on spray. i think i heard he was on passtime. like a week or 2 ago.

southside
08-05-2009, 09:08 PM
Yea they were that quick at all friend walked one at the track with his ls hatch.But you should have went to second if you were going that slow prolly would have been closer.

Turbodude06
08-06-2009, 08:31 AM
oh come on you know how slow those ponies are :lmfao:

Hey u owned one too:gay:........................

But yea I do own one:D... But its the 4.6:(... I haven't raced my wifes 96 GT yet but it feels a lot faster then the accord and its just an auto, I just thought the foxbodys were faster then the 94-98's:no:......

SX-MAN
08-06-2009, 10:20 AM
5.0 * 61.02 = 305 they are both 305 ci.... the crank makes the diff...........:goodjob:

04GTOLS1
08-06-2009, 01:24 PM
4.6's suck. I have a 2000 GT.... and you gotta do all kind of stuff to make power out of them. FAIL

HypnoToad
08-06-2009, 01:31 PM
302s are quick,u gotta look at them from the time period not comparing it to today standards.

a 14 sec car was quick in late 80s,like my camaro its slow now but was decent when it was new

Sinfix_15
08-06-2009, 02:05 PM
was this the guy?
http://memimage.cardomain.com/member_images/4/web/2416000-2416999/2416491_837_full.jpg

Turbodude06
08-06-2009, 02:43 PM
was this the guy?
http://memimage.cardomain.com/member_images/4/web/2416000-2416999/2416491_837_full.jpg

HAHAHAHA!!!!:lmfao:

Lankhoss
08-06-2009, 02:54 PM
5.0 * 61.02 = 305 they are both 305 ci.... the crank makes the diff...........:goodjob:

Often times companies will put a "name" on a size of a motor, but it isn't always the most accurate. This is one example.

GM used the 5.7L V8 for decades. It was always a 350ci motor. But when the LS1 came out, the displacement actually went down to 346ci.....however, it was still called a 5.7L.

My motor is peculiar in that it's the exact opposite. Mine is a 7.0L, which comes out to 428ci. However, since GM was known for its 427 motor, they just CALL the LS7 a 427 (even in the car's literature), even though it actually IS a 428.

HypnoToad
08-06-2009, 02:58 PM
i always thought a 302 and 305 were 4.9L,while a 307 was a 5.0

Sinfix_15
08-06-2009, 02:59 PM
ford 5.0= 302...........
chevy 5.0 is a 305 right?........ just a little difference in the stats there not that it really matters. man i miss my accord

5.0 mustangs are 301.59 if you want to be technical. appearantly 302 was a more attractive badge than 301.59.

4" bore, 3" stroke = 302
4.030", 3.25" = 331
4.030", 3.50" = 347

Josh...
08-06-2009, 09:15 PM
Hey u owned one too:gay:........................

But yea I do own one:D... But its the 4.6:(... I haven't raced my wifes 96 GT yet but it feels a lot faster then the accord and its just an auto, I just thought the foxbodys were faster then the 94-98's:no:......

They are slow stock, but you are hard pressed to find to many stock foxs. And you want to talk about a slow car, lets talk about any NA (5.0 & 4.6 not motor swaps) SN95 but I'm bias so what do I know.

Sinfix_15
08-06-2009, 09:52 PM
They are slow stock, but you are hard pressed to find to many stock foxs. And you want to talk about a slow car, lets talk about any NA (5.0 & 4.6 not motor swaps) SN95 but I'm bias so what do I know.

sn95 is the slowest generation of mustangs... excluding the "king cobra" days ofcourse. Most ford people do not claim those to be mustangs.

I dont really understand the logic behind saying SN95s are slow without boost... had you of attached that to the 4.6s i could maybe see where you are coming from. Sn95 is basically the same platform as a fox... actually... the mustang platform has pretty much been the exact same for most of its production. The only reason Sn95s are slower stock.. is because theyre more equipt cars... bigger... 4 wheel disc brakes, heavier than foxbodies and the 4.6 engine has less of an aftermarket than a 5.0 and its also a more intimidating engine to build. I see what you were getting at.... but it was a little off.

Josh...
08-06-2009, 10:18 PM
I was saying that to the guy that thought his wifes auto was faster than your average dd fox. I know that the SN95 being slow is not news to anyone else and your right a new edge doesn't have any balls without atlest a 4.10 maybe even a 4.30.

Turbodude06
08-07-2009, 12:02 PM
I was saying that to the guy that thought his wifes auto was faster than your average dd fox. I know that the SN95 being slow is not news to anyone else and your right a new edge doesn't have any balls without atlest a 4.10 maybe even a 4.30.

I didn't say my wifes was faster, by no means:no:

WTF?
08-07-2009, 12:08 PM
Hey u owned one too :gay:.....................

But yea I do own one:D... But its the 4.6:(... I haven't raced my wifes 96 GT yet but it feels a lot faster then the accord and its just an auto, I just thought the foxbodys were faster then the 94-98's:no:...... i know thats what i was talking about :lmfao: i forgot you had one too. oh how much you selling it for?

Turbodude06
08-07-2009, 12:22 PM
i know thats what i was talking about :lmfao: i forgot you had one too. oh how much you selling it for?

I'm not right now, I just bought it for her like a month ago....