PDA

View Full Version : Power Mods twin turbo 4 cylinder?



CHADbee
01-09-2009, 11:07 PM
i have always know this was a stupid and pointless set up for a 4 cylinder car. yet this one will be a full race car that seams like it will perform great.

2.6L motor up from 2.4L
twin td04 turbos for break in
twin big wheeled td05 looking for 850+whp
eclipse 420a head with turbo out front
no wastegate
100% meth
(8)1600cc injectors
19PSI per turbo(38 total)
10K revs

opinions? thoughts? stupid? why would this be a good set-up over a single turbo 4 cylinder? powerband maybe?

http://i254.photobucket.com/albums/hh98/chadbee123/Friends%20Cars/dcr1.jpg

http://i254.photobucket.com/albums/hh98/chadbee123/Friends%20Cars/dcr2.jpg

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WQaW3Hfe8H4

Tree
01-10-2009, 05:28 AM
i think thats stupid as hell.. i would just put a big single turbo on it..

Got Milk?
01-10-2009, 08:43 AM
those are one tiny turbos.

CHADbee
01-10-2009, 09:17 AM
i think thats stupid as hell.. i would just put a big single turbo on it..
i agree, but maybe theres something we dont know. the people that built the car have ran strret driven neons into the 9s. they have to have a good amount of knowledge and skill.

iEvo
01-10-2009, 10:22 AM
AMS built a twin turbo set up for a 4g63 motor it looks sick

Hondatypr636
01-10-2009, 10:32 AM
Seems pointless to me but nice design.

nsany(atl)
01-10-2009, 10:38 AM
looks more like a sequential setup. The one on the right looks like a smaller exh. A/R

mirz833
01-10-2009, 11:16 AM
sick

CHADbee
01-10-2009, 12:14 PM
AMS built a twin turbo set up for a 4g63 motor it looks sick
see! why are the best shops out there doing this set-up? all i have ever known was TT4bangers were pointless...


looks more like a sequential setup. The one on the right looks like a smaller exh. A/R
manifold is weird isnt it? its called a "turbofold" LOL the exhaust side is built into the manifold.

Motivation
01-10-2009, 12:31 PM
Talk about traction loss when turbos spooled... lol

I know some people use (of course it was on V8 or something) a smaller turbo to help with low end rpms and a big turbo to take over when the small one has reached it's capacity. EX: some of the new Ford trucks (forgot which one had the TT) do this.

Either way, like you said, they obviously know what they are doing... Maybe they put two smaller turbos on there instead of one BIG one, is because it would reduce the lag and not warrant a big drop on the top end for power...

yungdz
01-10-2009, 12:49 PM
I want this

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v495/Japslapr/Momscamera070.jpg

there was actually a twin turbo subaru legacy with a 2.0L in the early 90's.

2turbo4u
01-10-2009, 05:58 PM
I guess just to see what they could do with this set up. I remember DRT did a twin turbo civic back in the day.

Member31410
01-10-2009, 09:11 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XuZNASEkoQ4

60' 1.370
330' 3.537
1/8 5.240
MPH 146.26
1000 6.686
1/4 7.903
MPH 188.70

This video was of their old setup. We'll see what this new twin turbo setup will do.

99' LuDe
01-11-2009, 03:06 PM
nice desgin, and i bet its quick. but deep down it will always be a dodge neon haha :)

CHADbee
01-11-2009, 03:13 PM
nice desgin, and i bet its quick. but deep down it will always be a dodge neon haha :)
repost from under my SN :D

Bruce Leroy
01-11-2009, 03:42 PM
I could see the twins being useful on a street car. Bigger top end power, with spool characteristics similar to stock. Seems like a win win... But i don't know if that setup, plus and intercooler/radiator would fit wit the oem core support.

Is the 420a head a direct bolt on??

Motivation
01-11-2009, 04:31 PM
repost from under my SN :D

Which is in return a repost from someone's ACTUAL SN. ;)

WANTED
01-11-2009, 04:34 PM
That's a pretty interesting setup they got going on there, far better than some I have seen. Typically, quite a few twin turbo 4 cylinder setups that have been attempted have been pretty laggy and didn't yield great power for what was attempted, but this setup is pretty damned aggressive compared to those.
Think about it, 100% meth and still have to use a twin fuel rail setup with 1600 cc injectors? That thing is just gulping fuel by the bucketful. I would be curious how it would do on straight E85 vs their current fuel configuration.

WANTED
01-11-2009, 04:36 PM
BTW, where the hell are the wastegates on this thing?

CHADbee
01-11-2009, 04:53 PM
I could see the twins being useful on a street car. Bigger top end power, with spool characteristics similar to stock. Seems like a win win... But i don't know if that setup, plus and intercooler/radiator would fit wit the oem core support.

Is the 420a head a direct bolt on??
yeah they have built a few street cars with twins but they have still been back by the firewall

not sure to be honest, i have looked into it too much.



Which is in return a repost from someone's ACTUAL SN. ;)
yeah its been said alot, by now its way worse than saying "itll buff out" when somebody posts pictures of a wreaked car. you'd think people would have gave up on it by now. i never call my car a SRT4, i always say neon cause it is what it is :goodjob:


That's a pretty interesting setup they got going on there, far better than some I have seen. Typically, quite a few twin turbo 4 cylinder setups that have been attempted have been pretty laggy and didn't yield great power for what was attempted, but this setup is pretty damned aggressive compared to those.
Think about it, 100% meth and still have to use a twin fuel rail setup with 1600 cc injectors? That thing is just gulping fuel by the bucketful. I would be curious how it would do on straight E85 vs their current fuel configuration.
yeah 10K revs and the fast spool makes for a nasty neon!



BTW, where the hell are the wastegates on this thing?
there are none.

WANTED
01-11-2009, 04:56 PM
there are none.

Good to know I wasn't losing my mind.