View Full Version : ATTN Hollywood
Friggintitsman
11-17-2008, 01:42 PM
http://news.bostonherald.com/track/star_tracks/view.bg?articleid=1132655&srvc=home&position=also
This is blasphemy!!!!
I insists that you stop remaking good movies. Only about 1 in 20 is a success. Do like everyone else and steal the story and call it something different. Don't slap the name on it and ruin the old movies for poeple as well.
I heard Micheal bay is remaking Friday the 13th.
The new Friday the 13th looks good.
damn, this movie won't be good due to the fact that black ppl fight dirty.
i didnt know that kid was his son.
pursuit of happiness was a good movie. :ninja:
ran, post up a link.
http://friday-the-13th--trailer.blogspot.com/
this link. i found it.
http://www.importatlanta.com/forums/showthread.php?t=201127
I win.
TheGodfather
11-17-2008, 04:54 PM
They are fucking up big time. They are coming out with another Punisher, when the first one was awesome.
Why not come up with something new?
Those rich hollywood jews don't make enough to think creatively?
They are fucking up big time. They are coming out with another Punisher, when the first one was awesome.
Why not come up with something new?
Those rich hollywood jews don't make enough to think creatively?Why wouldn't you create a sequel to something that did well? :thinking:
TheGodfather
11-17-2008, 05:24 PM
Why wouldn't you create a sequel to something that did well? :thinking:
It isn't a sequel. It's the same thing they did with the Hulk.
It is a completley different movie with a different setup and different actors, yet the same main character.
I don't get it. It doesn't supplement the previuos movies. It's like a remake all changed up. Usually they don't do that when movies are less than a decade old, now they are doing it all the time.
It isn't a sequel. It's the same thing they did with the Hulk.Not necessarily. The first Hulk tanked, and rightfully so. Marvel did the second Hulk movie to make up for the first one.
The Punisher did well for itself and they're merely capitalizing on it's success with a different story. Nothing wrong with that. It's just like what they did with Spiderman, only with different actors.
I don't get it. It doesn't supplement the previuos movies. It's like a remake all changed up. Usually they don't do that when movies are less than a decade old, now they are doing it all the time.It's not a remake. That's like saying because the first Star Trek movie was great, that all the following ones were remakes of the first one.
Friggintitsman
11-17-2008, 05:54 PM
They are fucking up big time. They are coming out with another Punisher, when the first one was awesome.
Why not come up with something new?
Those rich hollywood jews don't make enough to think creatively?
Funny though that will be the third time they've made the first one. They made one in the early 90's too.
The Ninja
11-17-2008, 07:44 PM
Not necessarily. The first Hulk tanked, and rightfully so. Marvel did the second Hulk movie to make up for the first one.
The Punisher did well for itself and they're merely capitalizing on it's success with a different story. Nothing wrong with that. It's just like what they did with Spiderman, only with different actors.
It's not a remake. That's like saying because the first Star Trek movie was great, that all the following ones were remakes of the first one.
GTFO with your logic and good arguments.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.2 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.