Log in

View Full Version : honda (concept) S3000



jr4mny
10-09-2008, 02:19 PM
what do you all think about it.
pic:

http://i38.tinypic.com/2irb1ux.jpg

Article: Road And Track Mag:

A typhoon of rumors has been swirling around Honda's headquarters in Tokyo, Japan, about the company's next generation of sports cars. While we have already seen spy photos of the future NSX, we have not seen anything about the next-generation S2000. A source close to the company revealed that Honda is indeed in the process of building such a car, but wouldn't disclose specific details.

The OSM (Open Study Model) concept car definitely raised some eyebrows recently at the London show, but that car was just a convertible version of the CR-Z hybrid sports car shown at the Tokyo Motor Show last year. The OSM was penned by Honda's European design team, and our people tell us that the real S2000 successor will have much more influence and input from Japan. Also, the CR-Z and OSM have been engineered as front-engine/front-wheel-drive models, and the S2000 successor will no doubt be a rear-wheel-drive car. So apparently the OSM has nothing to do with the S2000 successor. Or does it...?

There's the possibility that the OSM may very well be a design study of the next S2000, wearing the veil of an open-top CR-Z to throw us off. There was also a sighting of a mysterious prototype sports car near Honda's R&D headquarters in Japan that seemed to share the OSM's proportions, yet looked completely different. Could this be another design study of the S2000? We think so, so we took pieces of that car, melded it with the OSM and came up with this image, a handsome car with an Audi R8-esque face, a long hood and a profile reminiscent of the current S2000.

As for what will go under the hood is still unclear. There have been rumors that Honda may equip the car with a V-6, perhaps a new 3.0-liter or the 3.5-liter in the Acura TL, thus the name S3000. In the U.S., this makes sense because it would give the car much more low-end torque (something we Americans love), not to mention improved smoothness and quietness for freeway driving.

With such an engine, you can expect power to be in the 280- to 300-bhp vicinity, enabling a 0–60 run in the sub-5-second range. The more probable choice is a 2.2- to 2.5-liter inline-4. Honda, which has traditionally shied away from big-displacement powerplants, may feel that a 4-cylinder engine makes more marketing sense in this age of high gasoline prices. There's also talk of a simple hybrid system.

Only those directly involved with the next-generation S2000 project know for sure what the car will be like. We'll know for sure in 2011, after Honda releases the NSX and CR-Z.

Nerdsrock22
10-09-2008, 02:28 PM
Boo to a v6....

I still probably won't be able to fit, so I don't guess it matters too much anyways. :(

Ran
10-09-2008, 02:30 PM
I like the bumper...but that's about it. lol

MR2DR
10-09-2008, 02:33 PM
meh...
they lost the sexy body lines

Sammich
10-09-2008, 02:37 PM
I LIKE...

Brown Man
10-09-2008, 02:37 PM
concept cars always look crazy. hopefully they finalize with something simpler

Dirty Octopus™
10-09-2008, 02:40 PM
im not too sure about the front but i guess its okay :dunno:

looks like we'd be able to see lower offsets on a Honda sX,xxx for a change so thats a plus :goodjob:

jr4mny
10-09-2008, 02:43 PM
^ yea im kinda the same, the lines are a little out there but, i think its kinda nice.. it still would probably be a tight fit for me though lol..

©hris
10-09-2008, 03:18 PM
looks like the SLK

SenorJ
10-09-2008, 03:35 PM
no.

VQ35 Star
10-09-2008, 03:45 PM
mehh, maybe if the lines on the hood/bumper were gone.

m3dic8d
10-09-2008, 04:22 PM
I like the s2k better... Nothing on this really stands out to me

neon_guy
10-09-2008, 05:38 PM
It looks like a convertible Evo. However, a V6 might actually make it a useful car. The current version is UBER unimpressive to me.

gen2freak
10-09-2008, 05:47 PM
i dunno about that!

jwrape
10-09-2008, 06:06 PM
I thought that this was the new S3000 Concept
http://images.craigslist.org/1131fb127ZZZZZZZZZ89p8215041ca8831118.jpg
http://images.craigslist.org/1fb124135ZZZZZZZZZ89p955b656640ba1dc1.jpg:goodjob:

Nissan Sean
10-09-2008, 06:12 PM
doesnt look bad. i hope they give it power. or hopefully some torque. i like the looks of it anyway.

CHADbee
10-09-2008, 07:03 PM
i like the s2k styling more but the V6 would be great in my eyes.

drive a 350z and then drive a s2k and you can tell the difference in the low end grunt sooo much more.

despite what most ricers think, HP looks good on paper, but TQ whens races and makes for a fun to drive cars :D

Z33_kid
10-09-2008, 10:36 PM
the car looks good but i imagine this at a base price of 40k

thecoolcutter
10-09-2008, 10:53 PM
An S3000 Hybrid would be pretty interesting. :yes:

4uh8ers
10-09-2008, 11:05 PM
looks like a 350z and a mercedes slk had sex

DB4LYFE ™
10-10-2008, 12:42 AM
I thought that this was the new S3000 Concept
http://images.craigslist.org/1131fb127ZZZZZZZZZ89p8215041ca8831118.jpg
http://images.craigslist.org/1fb124135ZZZZZZZZZ89p955b656640ba1dc1.jpg:goodjob:

wtf? :no:

~DB4LYFE

DecoyOctopus
10-10-2008, 12:49 AM
idk i think a v6 wouldnt be as cool as many of you do. i think the car was meant to be something else, the most powerful na 4 cylinder shoud be topped by something better not bigger. the ap1 s2k had the most output per liter than any production car NA. i think they should top that...v6 would be cool but if it produced more than 120 hp per litre. otheriwse no.

DecoyOctopus
10-10-2008, 12:53 AM
ok i calculated it if the new s2k is a 3 litre then it should make 360+ horsepower naturally aspirated if its 360 then its still not more impressive than the s2k its mereley the same if it beats 360 then its sum

h23bb2
10-10-2008, 11:39 AM
I'll take one. Well, pending engine type....

cactusEG
10-10-2008, 12:52 PM
its look good. But not the rear side...

CHADbee
10-10-2008, 01:05 PM
ok i calculated it if the new s2k is a 3 litre then it should make 360+ horsepower naturally aspirated if its 360 then its still not more impressive than the s2k its mereley the same if it beats 360 then its sum
i see where you are coming from, but if anybody thinks that a 240HP 4 cyl is better than a 300HP 6 cyl just because the 4cyl has more output per liter is stuck in the "on paper" world. more displacement, even if it only comes with 60 more HP is ALOT better because of the TQ numbers and when its comes to after market mods.

the f20c with all bolt-ons will add 10ish whp, for the same price and the same bolt-ons a vq35hr will add 30ish whp. so while you have less output per cly from the factory you get more TQ, more power across the whole powerband and a more mod friendly car.

Dwisforme05
10-10-2008, 01:05 PM
thats disgusting.

m3dic8d
10-10-2008, 01:25 PM
i see where you are coming from, but if anybody thinks that a 240HP 4 cyl is better than a 300HP 6 cyl just because the 4cyl has more output per liter is stuck in the "on paper" world. more displacement, even if it only comes with 60 more HP is ALOT better because of the TQ numbers and when its comes to after market mods.

the f20c with all bolt-ons will add 10ish whp, for the same price and the same bolt-ons a vq35hr will add 30ish whp. so while you have less output per cly from the factory you get more TQ, more power across the whole powerband and a more mod friendly car.
Agreed, a s2k with more torque and I'd cream my pants every time I drove it... even if it stayed around the 250hp mark (which it won't... I don't see it under 300)

CHADbee
10-10-2008, 01:56 PM
Agreed, a s2k with more torque and I'd cream my pants every time I drove it... even if it stayed around the 250hp mark (which it won't... I don't see it under 300)
well if it comes with a V6 it has to be atleast 300 cause the new 370Z will be 330HP with a 3.7L motor. the power to liter on the 370Z will be 90hp/liter, i dont think honda will let nissan outdo them.

SPOOLIN
10-10-2008, 05:01 PM
i like it.

amandDA
10-11-2008, 12:52 AM
i like it...