PDA

View Full Version : General Chat Schools in session: Is the GTR and others cars like it forgetting about the driver?



EJ25RUN
06-19-2008, 12:12 AM
Let me just go over some things before i start.

It's pretty apparent now that the holy Nurburgring lap time is the ultimate test of a car. Cars like the GTR are now boasting about its amazing numbers but i feel like there are too many variables to really see that number as a final means to judge a car. I think that allot of people just don't really understand what goes into putting together a Nurburgring lap. That's why i wanted to write this.

So let me begin.

I read an excellent article from this month's Excellence magazine. It was an interview with Walter Rohrl, former World Rally Champion and current head Porsche test driver. Now Walter has to be one of the most gifted drivers of our time and he's been lapping the Ring for the past 40 years. So I'm sure he knows what he's talking about whenever he is describing how a car feels. He is the man that set the 7:32 second lap in the 997 GT2, the 7:49 in a 997 Turbo, and the 7:28 in the Carrera GT.

One thing to consider about all those cars it that they used a standard 6 speed transmission instead of the lightning fast paddle shift unit. But the biggest reasons for these laps being what they were is Walter's knowledge of the track and luck.

Yes, Luck. When Walter did the 7:32 sec lap in the GT2, he almost hit a car coming out of Tiergarten which is the left hander after the 2km straight.
We know that the Nurburgring is open to the public on most days of the week and have seen cars being passed on other record attempts at the track. Walter has told Porsche that from now on, he refuses to do any timed attempts with other cars on the circuit.

Now as i pointed out in another thread, the GTR is so advanced that it doesn't need an ace driver in order to accomplish amazing results. While this is good for lap times, it might not be so good for the driving experience. Porsche had this problem with the 959. That car was genesis but it was too technological for its own good.

This forum has already had polls on which drive train is the most popular and RWD won easily. Why? Because of fun and being a part of the experience. It is also why most of us still own manuals while Americans keep complaining about sitting in traffic.

On paper a 4wd car with a semi box just cant be as driver oriented as a rwd with a 6 speed but results are results and even with a genius driver, sometimes the equipment wins.

Well Porsche has listened and the return of the PDK double clutch transmission is set.

Here is an article from todays Autoblog.

"Porsche decided to do a little 'Ring running in three different 2009-spec 911 models and quietly let the results slip during a press event. A 2009 911S fitted with Porsche's new twin clutch system (PDK: Porsche Doppelkupplung), Porsche Active Stability Management and "sport tires" took the top place, scoring a 7:50. The new PDK shifts a whopping 60-percent faster than the old Tiptronic S.

The first place getter was followed by what is assumed to be a 2009 911S with a manual transmission some eight seconds back, and then a 2008 911 S another four seconds back, at 8:02. There's no word on who was driving the cars, or what exactly counts as a "sport tire."

I want to know that if a 911 S with the PDK is 1 second slower than a 997 Turbo around the track, what will a combination of :

1. 997 Turbo + PDK
2. 997 GT3 + PDK
3. 997 GT3 RS + PDK (expected in late 2009)
4. 997 GT2 + PDK

Be able to accomplish. Oh and let's not forget the successor to the Carrera GT is in the works right now as well. But there is too little info to discuss this.

What im trying to say with this article is this. To all the people that keep saying the GTR will destroy other cars that are far more expensive than it is, so what? It is not as enjoyable to the driver.

It's kind of like having a drag racing car with a trans brake, yes its faster and more consistent. But it feels better to get the same result using a clutch and throttle combo.

Porsche along with other established marks realize that there are those of you that see numbers but don't know what to make of them. So now, there is a reason to go after the GTR. I see Porsche and other European and American brands that are gonna spearhead the effort. But the big push will come form Japanese companies doing what ever it takes to beat the GTR. In order to do this, you have to give unskilled drivers, cars that do the work for them.

I ask. With this onslaught of tech and electronic aids, will the need to be faster force the automakers to make cars that forgot about the driver?

JITB
06-19-2008, 12:33 AM
I agree, but there comes a time to move forward. it reminds me of the animosity of the audi's and their quattro in their race cars. But why go into battle handicapped?

But i doo agree!

EJ25RUN
06-19-2008, 12:47 AM
I agree, but there comes a time to move forward. it reminds me of the animosity of the audi's and their quattro in their race cars. But why go into battle handicapped?

But i doo agree!

Good point you bring up.

But the battle is not the race track or the rally coarse. It is on the street.

Well we cant race legally on the street (despite what most people on here think)

And it comes down to the battle of bragging rights between bench racers.

But what about those of us that don't care and see every car as a different way to experience driving.

I know when i get in my car, and i drive it, i don't want electronics getting in the way.

I have faith that the pure sports cars like the Z06 Vette, M3 and 911 will continue to be offered as manuals and simple "real driving" versions.

But again, on a race track, abuse the rule book till you get banned in order to win.

But on the street, Remember why we love to drive in the first place.

81911SC
06-19-2008, 12:47 AM
I agree. You look at the Video of the YellowBird on the Ring and you tell me you can do that. You can't. Period. That is skill. Yes, you can drive fast, but not like that. Now in a car more in this day and age, say the GTR and you will go a hell of a lost faster but without near the effort. Companies must keep up technology wise and you can't blame them, but it is the truth. There is a reason I am a fan of the older Porsche's and if you ask anyone who drives one, they will tell you its a different animal. Yes, the new ones are faster and what not but it's not the same. You don't have the raw and visceral feel anymore.

JITB
06-19-2008, 12:52 AM
I tried looking up the list of driving technology in the GTR..couldnt find... what does it all have?

OneSlow5pt0
06-19-2008, 12:53 AM
I agree. You look at the Video of the YellowBird on the Ring and you tell me you can do that. You can't. Period. That is skill. Yes, you can drive fast, but not like that. Now in a car more in this day and age, say the GTR and you will go a hell of a lost faster but without near the effort. Companies must keep up technology wise and you can't blame them, but it is the truth. There is a reason I am a fan of the older Porsche's and if you ask anyone who drives one, they will tell you its a different animal. Yes, the new ones are faster and what not but it's not the same. You don't have the raw and visceral feel anymore.

agreed..........thats one reason ive always loved 80's sports cars(aside from fantastic styling)because they are pretty rough and bare but they have just anough comfort for everyday driving

87 Turbo II
06-19-2008, 12:55 AM
I actually read this thread through and I have to say I agree with you. That's one hting I love about my Rx-7. It is all mechanical. You get so much more feel for what the car is doing when there aren't any gismos tweaking everything. I'd rather come home after having fun on a track, not after winning some stupid competition. I mean, winning a race would be great and all but I'm content with smiling from ear to ear after a good solid run with both me and the car in tune with each other.

81911SC
06-19-2008, 12:56 AM
agreed..........thats one reason ive always loved 80's sports cars(aside from fantastic styling)because they are pretty rough and bare but they have just anough comfort for everyday driving
Great example of daily driving is the 911. Look at it, since it came out in 64 besides the RS models, what did it have? Rear seats. You and your wife and kids come to the track with you, you race, they have lunch and then DRIVE IT back home. You don't trailor these under normal conditions. I can throw some small children in there(hard) or I can fold down the seats and it's perfect for some clubs. Got to love that ****.

OneSlow5pt0
06-19-2008, 12:59 AM
Great example of daily driving is the 911. Look at it, since it came out in 64 besides the RS models, what did it have? Rear seats. You and your wife and kids come to the track with you, you race, they have lunch and then DRIVE IT back home. You don't trailor these under normal conditions. I can throw some small children in there(hard) or I can fold down the seats and it's perfect for some clubs. Got to love that ****.

yea,the 911 is a great car,i love 80s 911s...........i mean my camaro isnt a sports car,but i love driving it everyday and it is surpising very comfortable,but also very primitive

EJ25RUN
06-19-2008, 01:06 AM
i own an Sti so even though it is a fanastic car. The Symmetrical AWD system makes me guilty of what im writing against. I will on the other hand make a list of cars that aren't that old but are what current auto makers should use for inspiration instead of the Pentium processor.

1. Porsche 964 RS & 993 RS ~ RR
2. Lotus Elise ~ MR
3. Bmw E30 M3 ~ FR
4. Ford Escort Cosworth ~ 4WD
5. Peugeot 205 gti ~ FWD

OneSlow5pt0
06-19-2008, 01:10 AM
i own an Sti so even though it is a fanastic car. The Symmetrical AWD system makes me guilty of what im writing against. I will on the other hand make a list of cars that aren't that old but are what current auto makers should use for inspiration instead of the Pentium processor.

1. Porsche 964 RS & 993 RS ~ RR
2. Lotus Elise ~ MR
3. Bmw E30 M3 ~ FR
4. Ford Escort Cosworth ~ 4WD
5. Peugeot 205 gti ~ FWD

agreed.....or even the Celica GT4,that was a amazing car

but least we still get some cars like Noble M400s

DeeAOne
06-19-2008, 01:29 AM
good thread, i actually read it. lol

the older cars are more exciting to drive in my opinion also. back before the days of TCS and other aids, when you could come out of the corner with backend out and keep it under acceleration. that takes skill. a lot of new drivers probably couldnt do it but claim they are such great drivers, when its really the machine doing the driving for them.

man
06-19-2008, 04:16 AM
100% agree, just because a car is awd doesn't mean it needs to practically drive itself, porsche does it right.

Skill is a thing of the past... it's a damn shame.

dartingd
06-19-2008, 07:29 AM
off topic as far as driving experience goes, but on topic with the lap times...did you guys see where honda upper management is basically demanding the nsx beat the gtr?

JITB
06-19-2008, 10:15 AM
Truthfully tho most of the cars mentioned to be so advanced, arent really "as" advanced. The only thing the GTR really has that is ahead, is the tranny. And the only thing that really stands out is the rev matching system. Last year this time it was AWD demand and AWD is god.. And they make these cars with AWD that need to drive better and have the technology to do that.

EJ25RUN
06-19-2008, 11:06 AM
Truthfully tho most of the cars mentioned to be so advanced, arent really "as" advanced. The only thing the GTR really has that is ahead, is the tranny. And the only thing that really stands out is the rev matching system. Last year this time it was AWD demand and AWD is god.. And they make these cars with AWD that need to drive better and have the technology to do that.

That's not true. One thing about my Sti is the genius that is the "symmetrical" awd system and the Evo's as well. I dont even have yaw control. The GT-Rs awd system is even more advanced than that. It's computers that keep you in shape that's all.

I also say that this is all great for a street car running on regular roads. No one wants to crash for the rear end just snapping out on a 40 mph turn in regular roads. But on the track, that's where i feel skill is important and an STi can hide your faults as a driver.

BKgen®
06-19-2008, 11:20 AM
love the sig, EJ :goodjob:
can't wait till this weekend!

JITB
06-19-2008, 11:29 AM
That's not true. One thing about my Sti is the genius that is the "symmetrical" awd system and the Evo's as well. I dont even have yaw control. The GT-Rs awd system is even more advanced than that. It's computers that keep you in shape that's all.

I also say that this is all great for a street car running on regular roads. No one wants to crash for the rear end just snapping out on a 40 mph turn in regular roads. But on the track, that's where i feel skill is important and an STi can hide your faults as a driver.


But symmetrical/torque Distribution setups have been around since the 70's. The Attesa ets system in the gtr is more advanced and cpu controlled. But the Attesa System has been used since the r32 in the gtr's.

i still see both sides, and agree that it would be nice to see them try to figure out the proper distribution for the car itself rather than make it cpu controlled. But also cars arent being made the same and have hundreds of extra safety features and alot more power these days. I dont think it was as complicated for Ford to put together the 34/66% distribution in the 227hp escort rs. i mean twice the power, and twice the weight..its gonna need some sort of technology.

Kaiser
06-19-2008, 03:05 PM
100% agree, just because a car is awd doesn't mean it needs to practically drive itself, porsche does it right.

Skill is a thing of the past... it's a damn shame.

Audi produced pretty basic Transaxle-CD style Torsen Diff Quattro systems up until pretty recently, even on their S models. Symmetrical, no real electronics and a decent 5 or 6 for a gearbox. They've upped the tech levels a bit in their gearboxes but for the most part it's to compensate for the neccessary added weight that comes with newer vehicles (More Airbags, more airbags, more airbags, because God forbid we learn how not to hit each other).

My A4Q feels like a car 2/3rds it's weight in the corners, and takes some practice to get used too but can be even more nimble on it's feet with some proper throttle and clutch play through a corner. I agree completely, cars should be built for driving, not for the absolute performance they can generate. Porsche has it right, BMW has it right, Audi is slowly starting to stray further away but has had it right as recently as '05 with their V8 powered S4's. Honda's S2K is a good example, and the NA and NB Miatas. The older MR2's. All these are great cars. I wish more Americans would stop wanting to drive Denalis and pick up some of these.

Axon360
06-22-2008, 01:44 AM
I never thought about this, I'm glad you guys have brought this to my attention; I always seen these new added "features" as a ploy for auto manufacturers to bring business/revenue back into its dealerships.

Z0_o6
06-22-2008, 10:53 PM
I'm with you 100%. When the car has every "driver aid" imaginable what's left to do other than play the video game? Smash the throttle, point it in the right direction and pull the shift paddles? That's not driving! I also drive an STi EJ, but you have to understand there is still not a TCS, VSA, and it has an H-pattern shifter. THAT'S what makes them still fun to drive. I am all for technological advancement, but at the same time at least make it driver-defeatable.

SandM
06-22-2008, 11:44 PM
i'm always going to be a big fan of driver compatabiliy with cars. the new evo greatly disappointed me. it lost it's raw aspect (has the manual option even come out yet?)
my biggest pet peeve lately is the drive by wire systems. sure, your ECU can determine all these factors easier, control rpms and throttle percentage for certain situations, but the response lags. shifting takes a huge toll on your rpm's. just greatly erks me.

Capt._Ron
06-22-2008, 11:51 PM
Well im about to get bashed big time but 80's sports cars (and a certain secretary car) are where its at. Take a cheap ass s13 with no technology. Build about a 350 hp sr. Set up the suspension with a nice set of coilovers, throw in a diff and you have something that is just a blast to drive.

I would like to see certain series in racing that go aways from all of the technology. But as an older wiser friend pointed out, people balked at the syncronized transmission when i first came out and thought they could double clutch and be quicker. Paddle shifters will probably eventually take over all sports cars.